Apparently, my fair lady Tyche doesn't like you much.
(Tyche is the Greek goddess of luck, and even though her Roman counterpart is better known, I abhor how they crafted their pantheon.)
Because the game has made him suspicious of everything and everyone. (As one should be)MafiaSSK wrote:Why does that seem weird to you?thegeckoj wrote:unvote, vote: MafiaSSK
i have meta him and i dont like the looks of his page, admitted lurker playstyle is unhelpful at best, scummy at worst. plus he doesnt even have our game on his list, makes me suspicious of him.
plus his only two posts are one confirming(sorta) and one incourging people to meta him, which seems weird to me.
vote: MafiaSSK
Obvious lynch for today.
Leave the non-game related stuff where the non-game related stuff belongs. He is a young one still and with careful training he can be crafted into a player that helps the game. (or hinders it as his past suggests) Am I wrong? Shouldn't we all, save for the scum (who should be pretending) be trying to find scum and kill instead of getting rid of that one guy that has an annoying laugh and keeps botching his punchlines?unvote, vote: MafiaSSK
i have meta him and i dont like the looks of his page, admitted lurker playstyle is unhelpful at best, scummy at worst. plus he doesnt even have our game on his list, makes me suspicious of him.
plus his only two posts are one confirming(sorta) and one incourging people to meta him, which seems weird to me.
One of those days, you guys need to let me in on the secret of FoS, whatever that means. My point is, what does meta game reading have to do with discovering his role in the game? Does he have a significantly different play style when he is scum? If so, meta away.thegeckoj wrote:Doktor Per, how are we to leave the non-game related stuff out? isnt each game we play something to build our skills on. and the player specific wiki pages are there to browse to know something about the players from the get go. MafiaSSK has either a very poor play style, is scum or just likes to make himself sound tough on his wiki page.
frankly i dont see a reason to take my vote away from him.fos Doktor Perfor trying to only have us focus on whats in front of us. this is an odd tactic as this early in the game as much if not more information can usually be found elsewhere.
Oh, you rascally rascal. Do you ever wonder why my vote is so stuck to your face?MafiaSSK wrote:I do my PBPA when there's a big wagon and someone is about to be lynched.afatchic wrote:mafiassk, he says that he does most of his scum hunting by PBPA's, yet we are at page ten and haven't seen one yet. when are they coming, because i would like to hear more thought other than just armix zazier and darox. and as i stated before i don't like how he joins the bandwagon with zazier, then attacks gecko for not having evidence yet, then when asked what evidence he has for people being scum he says he hasn't looked yet. either he is very lazy or he just wanted a reason to jump on the wagon and thought zazier had a decent reason.
Fixed that for you, it is amazing how many people make this mistake. It's Doktor, as in Herr Doktor.afatchic wrote:Doktorwhy are you voting Mafiassk?
Thanks for the love, scum buddy!hasdgfas wrote:Hascow's "I just replaced in" analysis(AKA, I'll read a few pages and then post my thoughts on certain things in those pages):
Pages 1-3
Post 7 - k7: Not random already? With a daystart and him not even posting yet?
Post 9 - Darox: I really dislike policy lynches.
Post 11 - Sineish: I don't see this as a valid reason
Post 15 - Darox: I still dislike policy lynches.
Post 20 - Darox: Lurking, while anti-town, doesn't mean someone is scum.
Post 27 - Sineish: I quite like this post. Per seemed a little too keen on a wagon that started with him making a "random vote"
Post 28 - SSK: Right, because the thread link was IN YOUR PM. Seriously now....
Post 35 - Darox: No, not necessarily scum. Town lurks too. Policy lynches are bad.
Post 39 - Darox: Get off it. Seriously. This is getting scummy.
Post 40 - zazier: This just seems a bit noncommital. You're responding to things, but not commenting on them. It looks like you're trying to moderate a debate.
Post 41 - Per: You've got to be kidding. You should really have better reasons at this point.
Post 42 - Gamma: Why the unvote?
Post 43 - gecko: Ah, so you're pretty much following the crowd. Why?
Post 44 - SSK: A good question, actually.
Post 47 - Per: Link?
Post 48 - Darox: GET OFF IT!
Post 50 - Per: Can't you at least let him do something scummy?
Post 53 - armlx: Is there a reason you're asking this?
Post 55 - retrowiz: You should really have a reason for getting someone to L-2 so early.
Post 58 - retro: Please don't fish like this
Post 59 - armlx: Good post.
Post 61 - armlx: Another good post
Post 62 - Per: Well, I'm not a huge fan of this post. It seems like a lot of joking around without really saying anything.
Post 67 - Apoth: Oh, hi. How are you? Anything else to say?
Post 68 - Per: Including yourself?
Post 69 - Per: What non-game related stuff? Why are you getting on them for voting SSK with about the same reasoning as you?
Post 70 - Darox: I'd love reasoning for the votes and FoSes. Plus, the last sentence is extremely scummy.
Post 72 - Darox: But maybe they weren't in some way random. Why are you assuming that?
Post 74 - zazier: good explanation, IMO. Excellent questioning of the wagon
Current thoughts of some players:
Darox - scummy for this tunnel visioned policy lynch. How does this help?
retro - scummy for almost everything up to this point
zazier - seeming town to me. Good explanations for things so far
Per - scummy. Staying on the SSK wagon for what seems to be no reason.
SSK - neutral. Still unhelpful, but not scummy.
armlx - neutral. Where are you? You seem quiet.
Sineish - seems town to me right now. Good insights on Per.
I will not be voting until I am fully caught up, but my current vote would be on Doktor Per or retrowiz.
Expect at least one more analysis post today. Hopefully more than one.