Mini 1404 - Monopoly Mafia - Game Over
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
Hello everyone.
I'm gonna quick read through this game. I'm not in the mood to do a catchup wall post. If there is anything you want me to focus on early in the game or something you want my opinion on, feel free to say so now.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1076, Mehdi2277 wrote:A. Do you have the railroad B&O? Specifically that card and if you don't have it just you don't and not anything more. If you do then I want to know what power it has if any.
B. To direct a bit what are your thoughts on lurker's wagon before he scum slipped? Along with thoughts on current role discussion.
A. Yeah, I have it. It's as Lurker described it. I asked GNR when I received all my cards and he said I got it when Day 1 ended.
B. I'm about half way through the game. I have not yet gotten to the point Lurker scumslipped, but I am at the point where his wagon died off. I noticed some of the players stayed in the wagon, which is a good indication of town stubbornness. I started making a list of how I saw some players as I played and I wrote down several reads. I thought SC was scummy at first but his persistence in the Lurker lynch makes me think he is town. I've got an early town read on Medhi even though he was against the Lurker wagon. When I read how the lurker wagon started, knowing that he was scum, I find it an obvious wagon. His post 44, was a good point of start that I would have used to pressure him to. Then his play was scummy in general. His vote for LM was quite bad. I found Robert scummy. And I find Jal town. For some reason I wrote that Jake is whatever the opposite of SC, but I don't remember why I wrote that. It would seem that Baby got vigged, and I can completely understand why that was. Who ever did that should claim it, if they haven't done so already. This is basically what I have from reading 20 pages. Let's see if I can get to the fun parts.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
I'm all caught up. (Kinda, I'm in 1049, but I think its enough for this post to go through) Had to read sporadically but it was a fun read. Let's see, I'm not going to give a big wall on everyhting, So, I'll just post my notes that I wrote.
GNR's death flavor tends to be related to the acting party based on actual flavor. Gun tends to be vig/mafia, Knife tends to be SK/maybe mafia, and if you are flattened, it's a giant, squirrel run robot. Consider the possibility that there might be an SK and that the mafia action was either blocked or protected. Not enough evidence for this yet, though.
Mehdi: I've got a town read on him since early in the game. Him being seen staying home when he used a chance card, then needs confirmation from the mod. This lowers my read on him, but not enough to get a vote on him yet. You'll see why later.
SC/Cheery: I started with a scummy read, then that turned town. Post 356 is questioning the claim,then proceeds to direct the votes to Lurker and I think that that in itself is enough to clear him. Cheery dog got his vote remove at the end of the day, Don't know what to think from that.
Mogadish/TBG: His interactions early with Medhi and Lurker made me think he is Town. However, I need to refresh my mind as to why I think that. Given that I have a townread on TBG when he came in, this will be low priority.
Jal: Town. Per reasons already mentioned, but she brought the attention to Lurker that got him to claim.
LM: I've got him as town here. For him to be scum, he'd have to fake post 689 very well.
Robert/safety: I've labeled as scummy for mostly 181. 980: It makes me wonder, that would mean that he received that card from Lurker. Lurker had two cards. I received one of them. He lied about the electric being a tracker. but he then admitted to being scum rather than saying that he misread.If someone else received a card at the end of the day other than Safety, then Safety had the Electric card prior Lurker being lynched.
Jake: I've got him as the opposite of SC. He also read as scummy to me and not noticing the slip makes me wonder. Although, I can understand skimming that post.
*Waves at AI*
AI: I find him scummy to the highest degree. This doesn't read like his town play. 506 is the post that I would reference for this. I don't like it.
Xis: He went all day one under the radar for me. I have to check that out. I don't like his cheery dog vote at day 2.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1163, SafetyDance wrote:Oh yeah because if anyone else had the EC they would have kept it quiet? #980 was days ago, even the lurkers have read it by now, I would be getting rope burn around my neck right about now if there was another counter claim. This is funny too, anyone could claim they got the railway card, your claim of getting Lurker's card AFTER my claim of getting one of them, actually backs up my claim. You realise you could be counter-claimed too?
No no. If Lurker had two cards upon death, and more than three players received cards upon his death. Then one of them is lying.
I originally had a scum read on you, actually your slot, you are doing quite good. So, I am trying to reconcile how Lurker messed up his card in 307 (was it?). It's possible that he misread his own card. But maybe the card wasn't his in the first place. I am just making sure that you have indeed gotten the card from lurker. Since nobody other than you and me claim this, then I can infer that Lurker did have that card and that you did receive it.
One of the things that promoted me to think this way is that Waterworks is also a one shot tracker, Right cheery? Personally, I would have designed watcher and tracker into them, but I am no GNR.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1209, SafetyDance wrote:@Mod: Ok, what version of Monopoloy are we playing?
I'm seeing google images that are purple but all the wiki layouts are brown.
Monopoly switched the Baltic/Mediterranean properties from Purple to brown. I used to own a board with them Purple, but current boards have them as brown.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1239, Jake from State Farm wrote:Guile, why in your mind does SC and I have to be different alliance? I don't think you ever explained your reasoning behind this
Well, first part is that you cannot be both scum due to 1) your conversation on day one seems genuine and 2) SC/Cheery is town.
Second you found something suspicious on SC. You go after him saying you'll explain later. Then you say its gut, but you want him lynch. Take note that SC wants Lurker lynch at this time. You do give the posts that gave you your gut read, much much much later.
And you still seem to be suspicious about Cheery when he was been one of the most pro town players in the game.
But you are right, this is not enough to link you as opposite. Enough for me to be suspicious of you though.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
Misrep anyone?In post 1241, Jake from State Farm wrote:Youknow for a factSC is town? That's an interesting development
This is true. but your explanation was unsatisfactory. Yeah, your suspicion revolves on SC being a careful reader when he missed something early in the game. However, this is not indicative of any alignment. You don't even go through meta to back it up.In post 1242, Jake from State Farm wrote:Besides I did essentially explain my suspicious, just not all in 1 post-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1244, Jake from State Farm wrote:How did I misrep you? You said he's town did u not?
No, you said, that I said as a fact that cheery is town. It's typical for probably everyone in this site, that when they are confident in someone as town they will state "This person is town" with out it actually meaning that they know this as a fact.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1302, TehBrawlGuy wrote:I"m just still baffled by Jal claiming Vigilante after she's assuming Scum have a roleblocker by not lynching Medhi. I really don't like it. It seems possibly worth it to lynch her, since even if she's Town, it probably gets the card somewhere it won't be blocked. (whereas Scum may have card stealing/snatching powers or etc) I mean, you guys can't tell me two trackers, two watchers, and at least one vigil are out there without something to counterbalance it all.
Not a reason to think that Jal is scum. Unless she and Medhi are both scum, scum would know that they have a roleblocker so they would have known this plan will not face scrutiny.
With the consideration of the watchers it might work. But I see a problem that plan. As long as scum don't know what the problem is, they can't work around it.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
So, I'm kinda rereading everything that happened since I joined in. Let's start with monkey.
In post 1102, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Did a readthrough and my scumreads are at the end of the post.
Spoiler:
Current reads
Town
Safety
Jal
CheeryDog
Mehdi2277
Nuetral
Xisqomelir
Scum
Brawl
Jake from State Farm
1. Did you write this post as you read the thread?
2. You missed NumberQ. Any thoughts on his play?
3. I don't see why you place Medhi as town. Can you give me why this is?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1117, MonkeyMan576 wrote:as per #505 I have two property cards. I also have a worthless community chest card I got last night.
In post 1118, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I just got a pm from the mod saying I got a third card during the night he forgot about.
Can you please elaborate more on this?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1318, Mehdi2277 wrote:Guille does none of my posts referring to you explain why?
No. You only mention NQ as a lurker. But you mention me several time with intent on voting but no reason whatsoever. Just once you say: "Finally for the mock lynch Pseudo vote: guille. Early nice posts help but only if sustained and currently you remain one of the people I suspect most." in Post 1138. But that's vague and I don't know what you mean with vague.
From what I can tell, your entire suspicion of me is based on Number Q's inactivity.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
Monkey please answer the following:
In post 1308, guille2015 wrote:So, I'm kinda rereading everything that happened since I joined in. Let's start with monkey.
In post 1102, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Did a readthrough and my scumreads are at the end of the post.
Spoiler:
Current reads
Town
Safety
Jal
CheeryDog
Mehdi2277
Nuetral
Xisqomelir
Scum
Brawl
Jake from State Farm
1. Did you write this post as you read the thread?
2. You missed NumberQ. Any thoughts on his play?
3. I don't see why you place Medhi as town. Can you give me why this is?
In post 1309, guille2015 wrote:In post 1117, MonkeyMan576 wrote:as per #505 I have two property cards. I also have a worthless community chest card I got last night.
In post 1118, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I just got a pm from the mod saying I got a third card during the night he forgot about.
Can you please elaborate more on this?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1375, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I got boardwalk, it gives me the vigilante power to kill one player each night. I just got this today so I haven't used it yet.
That wasn't the intent of my question, but given that you are at L-1, this is as good as claiming in this game.
I wanted to know why you said: "As of #505..." That confused me. Then you said that the Mod forgot to tell you you had a card. I want to know how that event transpired. Paraphrased of course.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1379, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 1376, guille2015 wrote:In post 1375, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I got boardwalk, it gives me the vigilante power to kill one player each night. I just got this today so I haven't used it yet.
That wasn't the intent of my question, but given that you are at L-1, this is as good as claiming in this game.
I wanted to know why you said: "As of #505..." That confused me. Then you said that the Mod forgot to tell you you had a card. I want to know how that event transpired. Paraphrased of course.
The mod basically sent me an oops! post and said he had forgotten a card, and sent me boardwalk. :shrug:
Why did you say, "As of #505"?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
Ah, I have miss read. So now it makes sense. I'll explain. "as of" implied that you were not going to state how many cards you had after 505. So, it didn't make sense to me. But now I get it.
I'm going to post a revision of my reads after I come from lunch. Nobody lynch yet, it's not worth it yet.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1448, Mehdi2277 wrote:Monkey who are you shooting if you don't get lynched? I know you said you'd listen to what people said, but if the day ended now who would you shoot? Even if monkey is scum assuming one of the vigs is town (which jal likely is at least) keeping both alive for now has its benefits it the kills aren't just anywhere. UNVOTE: Monkey If monkey is scum and the kill he's referring to is the nk that blocks scum from night killing to just leave him alive and control the kill.
VOTE: guille
Medhi, you have just said this:
In post 1402, Mehdi2277 wrote:
Yeah inactivity plusthe other big reason that somehow disappeared PoE. If you disagree with me suspecting you for not being a town read then argue which of my town reads are bad.
So, your only argument on me is inactivity? I agree that NQ has been inactive. But you really can't say that about me. I have been posting regularly and consistency after I had read through the game and posted my first reads. If you have something else on me say it.
One thing I am noticing is that this is not your town play that I have seen on other games.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
The Following are my strongest town reads. (In no particular order)
Jal: Forced Lurker to claim and found his slip. I don't know if anybody else would have seen it.
CheeryDog: Kept the pressure on Lurker with a good argument that was that the cards do not define the alignment. First to say that. This doesn't have any indication of being a bus.
Safety: I see no scum motivation or inconsistency with his exchange with Mehdi and myself.
Leaning town: (In no particular order)
LordM: On par with CD on day 1 and lower activity today. However, his posts are town motivated although he has been accused of being ignorant.
Monkey: My questions were to see if there was a certain consistency in him, who replaced AI who I was suspicious of. Two points of evidence here. One is that if we assume that he wrote his catchup post as he was reading it, it does not read like someone that knew inside info, or information that they would have gained by reading a scum QT, prior to reading the game. This is a weak case because there is quite a big assumption, and it can be faked. But read through it and notice how his reads change and formulate as he reads. Second is the strongest. The confirmed mod error is gold here. I misread his statement and thought that he had prior knowledge that he had known he had three cards when he shouldn't have unless his scum buddies told him. Had AI/Monkey been scum, he'd know about the third card since it is likely that AI would have sad it in the scum chat. Voting for him is dumb. One thing to worry though is that when the Lurker flip came though, AI posted 676 no vote.
TBG: I need to ISO him and do a PBP. But his posts seem consistent, contributing. I place him as the one closest to Null of this group. And then there is this town read I had on Mogadishu
Null to Scum: (In no particular order)
Medhi: I basically lost all my town read from him. Basically, he currently has 2 scum reads (Monkey and Me) with slight suspicion on Xis. However, he has put forth no argument other than inactivity for me, which is not true. I have been active given the time frame in which I post. There is the information that Safety has, inconsistency with his claim, and he defended Lurker prior to him slipping.
Xis: Posts with lots of words and questions, but rarely does followup on the questions. His analysis are OK, but I would keep an eye on him. I've got something in his 899 that I will explain in the next post.
Jake: Gut. I have a suspicion on him, but I think I have to do a PBP analysis on him at some point soon. Also, he said he had information in 932 and hasn't said anything about it, or I missed it.
Conclusion. I'd find scum in (Medhi, Xis, Jake) Primarily due to POE. If I am wrong about something it would be on LM, Monkey and TBG, but I am confident in my analysis of LM and Monkey.
I'll concentrate my effort on Xis, but my vote can quickly go to Medhi if so. Not doing anything with Jake until I PBP him.
Vote Xis-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 899, Xisiqomelir wrote:I'm not surprised by the Uber NK, but I'm sort of amazed by the Baby one. She didn't really have much by way of reads. There was a long Jal-fight, and an unvote, and this:
In post 398, Baby Spice wrote:
Since you asked.
Scum: Jal
Leaning scum: Agent I, Xis *****
Null: Jake* Medhi, Mog ***
Vig bait: Mhork, NS & NumberQ ****
Leaning town: Lurker** Robert** SC
Town:
*I did have Jake as leaning scum until recently
**Not sure scum would mention getting Community chests cards so quickly, otherwise was null.
*** Not sure if he's leaning town or just faking so null.
**** Needs to post or be replaced. Vig bait due to LAL
*****Really didn't like Xis' entrance or early votes. Easy target and bandwagoning. Add in way under posting.
And a Mehdi vote and a Lurker vote.
In post 892, Jake from State Farm wrote:why do you think the throat slit is mafia? in my experiences of playing mafia, SK usually has a non gun weapon most usually a knife and mafia has a gun. Regardless I doubt either was a vig target.
I agree with this.
In post 892, Jake from State Farm wrote:
lurker was scum and I was suspicious of that Cheer Dog/SC slot yesterday. The fact lurker flipped scum, that vote by SC early on looked like a bus vote.
And this I'm happy to continue with.
VOTE: Cheery Dog
This is an interesting post considering that we have currently some evidence that suggests that Baby killed UN and UN stayed put.
Jake points out that Baby was likely the scum kill. Xis points out that he does not understand why this is, but he is on the top of the Baby scum list that he posted and does no mention of it.
The Cheery vote is bad. Bad argument from Jake.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1471, Mehdi2277 wrote:
That's a vague meta thing with little backing for it. And somehow disappeared is referring to you not noticing it. PoE works for me as a scum tell and the second sentence gives you where to argue it since now your just arguing the fact it's poe instead of why the poe is bad (what town reads are bad).In post 1462, guille2015 wrote:In post 1448, Mehdi2277 wrote:Monkey who are you shooting if you don't get lynched? I know you said you'd listen to what people said, but if the day ended now who would you shoot? Even if monkey is scum assuming one of the vigs is town (which jal likely is at least) keeping both alive for now has its benefits it the kills aren't just anywhere. UNVOTE: Monkey If monkey is scum and the kill he's referring to is the nk that blocks scum from night killing to just leave him alive and control the kill.
VOTE: guille
Medhi, you have just said this:
In post 1402, Mehdi2277 wrote:
Yeah inactivity plusthe other big reason that somehow disappeared PoE. If you disagree with me suspecting you for not being a town read then argue which of my town reads are bad.
So, your only argument on me is inactivity? I agree that NQ has been inactive. But you really can't say that about me. I have been posting regularly and consistency after I had read through the game and posted my first reads. If you have something else on me say it.
One thing I am noticing is that this is not your town play that I have seen on other games.
I fixed your quote.
Ok, I get it now. It's inactivity + POE. Now, I'd like to know if your refering to inactivity from me or NQ. I challenge you to prove that I am inactive. Of course you have to define "inactivity". I can accept POE. That's cool. I do that. Actually I am doing that now. But I am also focusing on finding scummy things on those that I don't find townish. Still lets check your Town read: Well, I think your wrong in considering Jake and Xis as a town read and I don't know why you put TBG in about the same level as Jal and Safety. I disagree with you in not including CD grouped with Jal and Safety. I give my reads to why i think that in my latest reads post.
Can you please give us your current reads?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1466, Jake from State Farm wrote:Btw, people need to stop making lists of reads. Lists are the worst thing you can do as town IMO
I disagree. The benefits outweigh the risks. The information that scum might get from the reads can be ascertain by simply reading the thread. Reads lists makes it easier to get information which is a valuable asset for town.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1499, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 1498, SafetyDance wrote:
In post 1496, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 1494, SafetyDance wrote:At the moment I'd say cross-kill each other, vig claims are always dodgy.
And then risk both vigs cards possibly fall into scum hands? or for more people to end up claiming receiving said cards only to do the same tomorrow night?
UNVOTE:
What says the cards aren't already in scum hands?
My (and almost everyone else's) town read of Jal does - though it is quite possible Monkey's is in scum hands currently, as such he is currently most likely to be lynched.
If they are both town, they will definitely kill each other and then we have the potential of falling on scum hands. If they are both scum, they will choose not too.
For our current situation. Jal is universally considered town. Everyone seems to want monkey dead, and we don't know where his cards are going to go. So, a cross-kill is impossible.
If we go with the mock Lynch, both vigs should target the same player. Then we avoid Wifom and roleblockers.
I'm fine with or without the mock kill, but it is clear to me that the owner of Boardwalk and park place (If any of the current owners die) should claim it first thing in the morning and state their target.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1475, Xisiqomelir wrote:Assuming that the expensive properties actually do give vig powers (this I consider true) I still think that most likely neither vig shot, the SK killed UN and mafia (or only very slightly possibly, a vig) killed Baby Spice.
My problem with the night actions is that I cannot conceive why scum would kill Baby. Did they think she had scum nailed? But it does seem like that was the case.
...
Actually, thinking about it now, and it sorta makes sense. She was probably killed to reduce the chance of being watched. If watched or tracked, they'd claim that they vigged her and people would have accepted that. That is the only explanation I can think off.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1506, Jake from State Farm wrote:Here I'll make it easy for you.
People ill only lynch today: monkey
People you can kill : xis(if monkey flips town) mehndi, mhork, or guile
Can you give your reasons for this?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1509, guille2015 wrote:Sorry, but where did monkey slip?
In post 1510, Jake from State Farm wrote:I've already explained that. Read the damn thread
Sorry to be so stuborned, but I just went and checked with your ISO. And you did not explain how monkey slipped. Or at least we have a different definition for slip.
You reference two "slips" on Monkey. 1st is that he did not answer your questions. 2nd is that he claimed to have recieved the card at an unusual time. The first 1 is not a slip by definition but it is reason to get suspicious though. The second was modconfirmed to have happened as Monkey explained it. So there was no slip.
The reason I asked is that by post 1510 you ascertain that Monkey Slipped and I disagree.
So, I repeat again. Where had Monkey Slipped?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1546, Mehdi2277 wrote:Guille what do you think of jake's replace out and replace in reason? Or how he'd tried to connect his role to things without claiming it? A lot of the tbg town read is similar thoughts on what to do and reads. As for reads safety > jal > tbg > cheery > jake > mhork > xis > guille > monkey. Guille you're following monkey on something when he himself rarely explains his reads and has been vague on everything.
I think nothing of it. No reason for it to be a lie and it is no indication of alignment. Why ask this? Nobody questioned this till now.
Fine I see your reads.
"Or how he'd tried to connect his role to things without claiming it?" I missed this. When did this happen?
I am not following Monkey on anything. That we have converged on the same conclusions is coincidental. There are things in monkey's play that makes me think that he is town. Primarily his consistency and his writing that makes me think that the way he presented himself at entry into this game as genuine. I could be wrong though, and he has done some things that make him scummy. Primarily his appeal to emotion, appeal to fear and some reasons for voting that I find unsubstantiated. If he is scum, then Madhi and Jake are likely to be town. And that's something that I am having a hard time to swallow.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1709, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1355, Jake from State Farm wrote:dude has ignored my questions and has showed up and put what he thought was an L-1 vote while speaking nonsense, I don't care if you like my vote, he's basically slipped imo
2 slips explained in 1 post. Glad you are reading closely guile.
I saw that, and that is not a slip. That is scummy behavior but it is not a slip. What lurker did was a slip. The card thing was an apparent slip,until it was confirmed true.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1714, Jake from State Farm wrote:Scumslips are things town wouldn't do and scum does. Those are both scum slips. You disagree? You are entitled.
He's stil ignoring questions, he's not doing anything to help town. He thinks he has found scum but isn't doing anything to convince people to vote with him and he isn't doing anything but waiving his vig claim around to defend himself.
I'm not changing my vote, and contrary to his opinion, if he's town it's nobody's fault but his own.
But what he has done that you tag as a scumslip is something that Town has been seen to do, especially the stubborn type town that Monkey appears to be.
I concede to you that your second paragraph is enough reason to lynch Monkey. It would seem that monkey is ignoring questions because he thinks he has already answered them though. At least that's what I am getting at. Questions about his change in reads has been answered by him, though. The thing is that normally I don't see scum blatantly ignoring questions. Hence why I have a bitter taste for this lynch.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
I am in agreement with the established plan. After reading the last 10 pages or so I concede that the best lynch today is Monkey. His flip will be the most informative. I am fine facing the vig. Given how many people seem to not like me, getting me out of this game would be ideal. I believe the following is the most current suggestion for the plan:
In post 1682, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
If Monkey is Town:
Role Owner Card Name Role Power Target Safety Dance Electric Company Tracker ??? Cheery Dog Waterworks Tracker ??? Safety Dance Mediterranean Avenue Watcher Jal Jake Baltic Avenue Watcher Safety Dance Jal Park Place Vig Mehdi Whoever gets Monkey's boardwalk Boardwalk Vig Guille (if Guille gets it, Xis)
If Monkey is Scum:
Role Owner Card Name Role Power Target Safety Dance Electric Company Tracker Mehdi Cheery Dog Waterworks Tracker Jake Safety Dance Mediterranean Avenue Watcher Cheery Dog Jake Baltic Avenue Watcher Safety Dance Jal Park Place Vig No Kill Whoever gets Monkey's boardwalk Boardwalk Vig No Kill -
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
I'm fine with revealing our neighborhood. I'll make a more substantial post later today.
For now, I'll say that, as we discussed in the free parking, the flip should have been considered as a "Town" flip. More precisely a "Not Mafia" flip. Given that the "scum" option was based on Linking Monkey with other scum and knowledge of town.
I have no knew cards today.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
I've got an orange (useless), red (Neighbor) and B&O (Useless).
So, was the deal with Medhi not seen moving on night 1 resolved? The problem for me is that there is no apparent Roleblock given that everyone seemed to have received their results properly.
Given that LM and Medhi were watched together. It would be impossible for them both to be Scum. I would like to assume that the game has 2 scum left rather than 1.
BTW, LM did say something early in the night. We all gave our scum reads and we all have similar opinions. He boasted that he knew that Monkey was an SK, and gave his reads. Then Cheery, placed his suspicions on LM and asked him if he was scum with Medhi. He posted at the end of the night with an apology and saying that he wasn't.
I share Cheery's concern on LM. Although, I think that LM is a very weak town read for me. I can't shake his play on day 1, as I have explained. I am confident in my town reads, as they have not changed since I posted them. If I am mistaken on them, it would be LM.
I want to hear from Xis now, and see what he has to say.
As for my thinking with the flip of yesterday's game, the reason I say that Monkey's SK flip, was essentially a Town flip, because had he flipped Mafia, we would have cleared Medhi and Jake and the the Trackers essentially become cops. The "scum" route was ideal for that scenario, but not for a scenario in which we get no such information. The "town" route was set to maximize the spread of getting scum in the event that we got no information. The SK flip, was essentially like that. It seems that only Cheery and I thought like that.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1879, Xisiqomelir wrote:Guille is only scum if the rest of his neighbourhood is town.
Also, how do you reach this conclusion?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
If we assume that the card are handed out randomly. then the odd of one of us being scum are high. But it is not a certainty, like Xis says.
Obviously starting this game I (And I also noticed SC too) took precautions of the other two. And I played close attention to what they said in-game and in the QT.
I am very confident in Cheery being town. And I have a town read on LM. That read has been affected by today's play and his response to the QT. If there is scum in the neighborhood, then it is most probably LM, but I really don't think that is the case.
My problem with what Xis said is that he said One of the neighborhood is scum. At least that's what was implied.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1895, Jake from State Farm wrote:I also want add that guile's reaction to being listed as a potential vig target felt off. It's not how I'd expect town to act.
Gut?-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1898, Jake from State Farm wrote:One of the neighborhood probably is scum. I'd bet anything that's true.
There is something really Odd here.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1903, Jake from State Farm wrote:quick question guile.
when you replaced in did you think your neighborhood was all town or were you under the impression that it's possible there could be scum in there?
The first thing I did was read the QT. I found SC to be scummy from the start. I am well aware of scum neighbors. I was neighbored with Ferb in the Phineas and Ferb game. And my scum buddy was neighbored with an SK. That game was a GNR Game so, so the first thing I thought was that the likelihood of one of them being scum was High. Hence why I payed close attention to their play. Because I played close attention to them, I came to the conclusion that they are likely town.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1902, Jake from State Farm wrote:why is that? I have never seen an all town neighborhood before so I have no reason to believe one exists in this game.
I'm fine with you thinking it's odd, but you have to explain why you think it's odd.
p.edit - Mhork was pretty town until a certain post he made at the end of day 2, the one i called him out on. After that post he went back to null/slightly scummy.
Cheery is a slight town read but very slight. If mehndi/you are town than I believe cheery is scum though.
It's true that all neighborhoods should be taken with a grain of salt. But assuming that every one has at least one scum in them is not the right way to go about it.
Besides. It would seem that this game handed out the cards randomly. No particular proof of that but I find it likely that that is the case. Given that then then its all based on probability. The probability that all 3 of the Neighborhood are town is 23% assuming there are three mafia and one SK in this game. So, it is possible.
Now, the reason I found your statement odd is because of the wording. If you think I am scum, and you are not voting for me. I don't see why you would word it as "One of the neighborhoodprobablyis scum.". For some reason that doesn't match your position on the members of the Neighborhood.
Your Voting Medhi.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1906, SafetyDance wrote:So by your own process of elimination that leaves you as scum? Doesn't make much sense. I had Mhork down as underlined and bolded pro-town day one too. His progressive play since start day 2 has been bad though. So ignoring outside causes like schizophrenia, there's something up with that. And I don't even have a "scummy" QT to go by, so I'm not sure why you're still giving a die-hard town read.
Mehdi is still the best lynch today, but I'm not going to vote yet, I want to use max time available because if he flips town, shit just got very interesting.
With Jal holding 2 vigs cards there *should* only be two kills. Best case scenario for scum is 5 people D4 and we're at lylo. Mylo if vig doesn't shoot on a town lynch.
Time to pop open a xis/jake iso.
Pedit: Riddle me this batman. 13 players start, 5 are dead. 3 in neighbourhood all alive day 3.
"So by your own process of elimination that leaves you as scum? " No. Because I am not assuming that there has to be scum in the neighborhood. If the two with me are town, then I have to conclude that the game started with a 3 town neighborhood.
I also do not have a die hard town read on LM. My die hard read is on Cheerydog. I stated that I am not certain of my Town read of LM due to everything that has been said about the topic. But My position is that he is still a town read, if not Null. So I have to work with that.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1907, SafetyDance wrote:In post 1905, guille2015 wrote:(fixed)
The probability that all 3 of the Neighborhood are town is 23% assuming there are three mafia and one SK in this game. So, it is possible.
If you think I am scum, and you are not voting for me. I don't see why you would word it as "One of the neighborhoodprobablyis scum.". For some reason that doesn't match your position on the members of the Neighborhood.
You don't think that a 77% chance quantifies the term "probably"?
That's not what I mean. The term Probably is used correctly, but I find it odd that someone will say thatIam scum, phrase it with the word "probably" and still not vote for me.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1911, SafetyDance wrote:I see there being scum in your neighbourhood very probable. Especially since none of you are pushing up the daises and have been in the qt since the start (didn't inherit cards). Probable doesn't mean most its the most likely. Raw statistics is now 37.5% of current alive list. Don't you agree that's a better percentage than 3/13?
9/13 x 8/13 x 7/13 =~ 23% assuming 3 scum and 1 SK.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
I'm on the phone so I'll be quick.
With a vig and a lynch you can take out 2/3 of the neighborhood and likely hit scum if one of us is scum. If you are certain that one of us is scum then this should be the strategy to use. Why waste the lynch on medhi and keep the neighborhood uncertainty for LYlo.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1922, Jake from State Farm wrote:Also another thing, in guile's catchup post he pointed to a post that SC made on page 15 and follows it up by saying SC was trying to direct people to vote lurker. But if you actually read pages 15-22 (where SC unvotes lurker) SC doesn't do anything of the sort. I'd almost call it an outright lie.
It's true that he did not outright request everyone to vote for Lurker, but rather he remain with his vote on Lurker until he found Baby scummier... and he kept saying reasons for which he found Lurker scummy. My interpretation of that is that he wanted him lynched. Then the topic died down and he discussed things with others finding town reads.
I would think that if SC was busing Lurker, he would find someone scummier much more quickly. Though it appears that his motivation for this game was off at the time so that might be the reason.
Unless SC is the kind of player that would buss like this, he is town. I looked back at a game I had with him as scum (Judge, Jury and Executioner) and it was hard for me to notice his aggressiveness towards others. Since it was a game with everyone having three votes, he used that to place votes on some of his buddies. But it doesn't feel the same way. I don't really have time to Meta him though. Maybe later.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1928, Mehdi2277 wrote:And guille can you show yourself being really calm as town when faced with pressure similar to being told you'll be killed? I know you were calm as scum in marketplace mafia under similar, but town meta for how it's null and not scummy?
I'll show you the way, You do the legwork.
Latest game Newbie 1301: I played badly and was lynched day 2 for that.
3831 iniM: Objective was to revive town. So I accepted my fate that many said they did not want me revived early, which is effectively a lynch in that game. I got revived later, though.
Micro 28: It was a kingmaker and I was a Hero. I don't know if this counts because I was invulnerable to being lynched. But I point this out because in this game the King was someone I correctly thought was town, so I did not want him to execute me and die.
These are the games I recall. I don't remember any other completed games I was threatened to be killed as town.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1979, Xisiqomelir wrote:3/3 scum in neighbourhood is impossible, given that we've lynched Lurker
2/3 scum in neighbourhood would be very unbalanced, and I think it unlikely since we've definitely got one scum in {Safety,Mehdi}
1/3 scum in neighbourhood is the most typical setup on site
0/3 scum in neighbourhood is bastardy, but not something I'll rule out completely (I've seen it once before)
This assumes that the cards were distributed non-randomly according to setup design and balance. We have concluded that they were handed randomly, so this does not apply.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
In post 1984, Jake from State Farm wrote:...
where is the reason he gave? because I don't remember any real reason other than him sheeping mhork
I checked his ISO, and yes, he doesn't explicitly say any reasons. But the does say this:
In post 492, StrangerCoug wrote:Right now why I think you're not making sense of my post is because you understand my refusal to unvote Lurker incorrectly. Let's set the record straight: My vote is a basic sheep of Lord Mhork's defense/counterattack (he's established it's a bit of both) of Lurker in #227, which basically accuses him of not reading the game. Why I didn't unvote Lurker is because cards can end up with absolutely anyone regardless of alignment as far as I know. I never said anything to the effect of disbelieving that cards give powers, which is why I questioned your understanding of my Lurker read in #478.
It is implicit that he finds Lurker scummy enough to have votes and that he is wondering why everyone is unvoting after lurker claims. He spends most of the time defending why he did not unvote.-
-
guille2015 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: April 17, 2012
- Location: DR
Although I wasn't asked, I say that the neighborhood is town/town/town. And to be clear that's Cheery/Guille/LM. Not to be confused with LM/Cheery/Guille.
Seriously now, I am not voting Jake because I find Medhi scummy. And today's event has me thinking that Jake and Medhi cannot be scum together. And this in itself is a conundrum, because I don't see a Medhi/Xis pair either. So unless Medhi and Jake decided to bus eachother because they were suspected of being scum (Plausible), then Medhi is paired with one of my town reads. Not Jal or Safety, so if that is the case It's LM or Cheery. So, in conclusion I am uneasy with a Medhi vote too.
There is one thing that Xis said earlier that makes me think that he could be town. (I'll keep it to myself for now.) This means that, from my point of view, it's Medhi and Jake. So, I am fine voting for either. However, Jake has made sense in my discussion with him. I noticed that I shouldn't be as certain of Cheery as I thought I was.
Vote Medhi