Oh wait, he's not in this game, so I guess this will have to do.
Mini 1113 - Brotherhood of the Wolf Mafia
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Yeah. The first one was me expressing my displeasure at a recent loss. The second was me being snide at your dislike of having 3 RVS votes (by adding more RVS votes to you).Mariyta wrote:Well, that was a quick ISO. Two bandwagon votes from Almaster, neither of which seems like an RVS vote. AMG, care to explain your votes?
So yeah, everybody talking about RVS quicklynch and all that needs to take a chill pill. There wasn't and isn't going to be a quicklynch. And if there is for some random reason, then holy hell that'd be a good thing because it would mean easy catching of scumz the next day.
Anyway, what I don't get is why all the people complaing about where people's votes are aren't voting Untrod Tripod. He gives us this little bit:
And then within the next 3-4 posts people are like, "OMG we're out of RVS." If we're out of RVS then "go go gadet bandwagon" isn't an acceptable vote. Yes?UT wrote:unvote, vote Katsuki
go go gadget bandwagon
But me personally, I don't care much about that. I'm liking my vote on Mariyta right now. Because this "people haven't posted" thing when it's page 2 and half the playerlist hasn't posted is 1) silly 2) forced scumhunting 3) smells like fake trying to appear town.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Ok basically what I got out of the past few pages is
MILLER-RECK VS VI-COOLDOG OMG WHO WILL WIN.
My reaction is:
1) I have played with CooLDoG (or w/e the fuck the capitalization is) and yes, he was terrible. However, he was also SOMEWHAT readable, so I wouldn't say he requires policy lynchage. So I think that angle from Reckamonic is bad.
2) RECKAMONIC, DON'T BE A FUCKING ASSHAT AND RAGE QUIT. IT'S FUCKING STUPID. NOW GET BACK IN HERE AND PLAY FOR REAL.
3)Vote: Reckamonic slotfor ragequit.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Fine then, that's totally acceptable and I understand completely. But you didn't say that when you RAGEQUIT. You said:xRECKONERx wrote:Well, you want a fucking synopsis?
Dram's university stuff is fucked up, Reck had to bail his boyfriend out of jail Friday night, and his boyfriend got evicted Saturday and moved all his shit in to Reck's place, so excuse us for being fucking done with this.
not playing with a bunch of fucktwats-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
What the fuck is this garbage.CoolDoG wrote:I'll keep my vote on reck, but I think now I understand his posting. You should post v/la and take a break, whats the point of playing a game if it isn't fun?
You either BUY that the quit was legitimate or you DON'T. You don't say, "oh, I think he's quitting for legit reasons, but VOTE ANYWAY."
Unvote. Vote: CoolDoG
I lol'd. <3 LMP. AKR is scumz.LMP wrote:The "I'm not the only one doing it!" defense spotted. The favored defense of 5 year old kids, criminals, and scum.
It was like page 2 then. There wasn't "EVERYTHING WRONG." It was one thing versus one thing and granted UT is scummier NOWWW but I didn't know that then.UK wrote:I suspect AGM because he seems to acknowledge everything wrong with Untrod Tripod but uses significantly weaker reasoning to vote Mariyta.
THE SLOT YOU ARE VOTING FOR ISN'T EVEN A LURKER SLOT.CoolDoG wrote:@lynch, sorry I don't have time for an in-depth post, but I simply don't think lynching lurkers on page 2 is a good idea. However, now that we are on page 8 I think lynching one could be possible. I like my slot vote.
RECK IF YOU ARE READING THIS: I'M SORRY I DIDNT'T TAKE YOUR SIDE IMMEDIATELY.
Is it a policy lynch if we lynch people that a confirmed cop has a guilty on? Is it a policy lynch if we lynch people who lie in an anti-town matter?SC wrote:AlmasterGM: I find the vote for Reckamonic for "ragequitting" cheap. This screams like a policy lynch to me.
NO. It's called lynching SCUM. I wasn't saying we lynch EVERYONE who replaces ALL THE TIME, I was saying, inthat specific context, what xReck did was scummy because 1) he didn't give any explanation for the quit OTHER than rage and 2) I had seen him play through rage as town before.
So it's NOT A POLICY LYNCH. End of story. If you want to take this to MD afterwards I would love to. Now stop.
Also, it makes no sense that you have this advocacy when right above you say LMP (AKA RECK) is scummy. So I'm pushing a policy lynch on my buddy? lolwut.
TL;DR SCUM PICKS FOR UK
CooLDoG - contradicting himself; shitty analysis.
AKR - Per LMP's awesomeness.
StrangerCoug - Too wrong to be town. What isn't wrong is fluff.
UT could be scum too but he's not posting, sooo.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
UK wrote:@AGM: Where is CD contradicting himself? If you already pointed it out, feel free to quote yourself.
----AGM wrote:
What the fuck is this garbage.cooldog wrote:I'll keep my vote on reck, but I think now I understand his posting. You should post v/la and take a break, whats the point of playing a game if it isn't fun?
You either BUY that the quit was legitimate or you DON'T. You don't say, "oh, I think he's quitting for legit reasons, but VOTE ANYWAY."
WhenSC wrote:I will stop when you stop polluting my case on you with irrelevant crap.Istop pollutingyourcase? You don't own the concept of Reckscum. Moreover, nobody else is calling is calling it crap BUT YOU, so maybe if you just stopped arguing semantics about what is / is not a policy lynch this wouldn't even matter.
In fact, the more I think about it and the more I read your response, the more convinced I become that you are scum. This whole calling my vote a "policy lynch" but then 1) not actually explaining why the vote in and of itself was bad, 2) dismissing my LEGIT REASONS for voting (e.g., you say "screw your meta argument) saying some policy lynches are good, and 3) turning the whole discussion into semantics about policy lynching makes me think you are using "policy lynching" as a fear tactic.
ORLY?SC wrote:Piggybacking FTL.
Piggybacking FTL.SC wrote:Good point. I find it interesting that somebody else gave a nameclaim possibility and Reckamonic took it and ran with it. Something's not right.
UNVOTE: Katsuki
VOTE: Reckamonic-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
If 4-5 people come out and say, "your arguments are crap," then I will accept that they are probably crap and STFU. Otherwise, I am going to roll with the fact that I am right and you are either A) scum or B) bad at determining what is crap. A being more likely in this case.SC wrote:Just because nobody supports my argument does not render it invalid.
You are underestimating the power of anger.SC wrote:I have called it a cheap policy lynch. You disagree. That you disagree is fine for the purposes of this part of my argument, but I don't see how else it is inadequate.
I do not accept meta as a valid basis for a vote. If xRECKONERx and dramonic are smart, and I hope very much they are, they'll play to their town meta as scum. Therefore, the concept of "town meta" is flawed. If you want me to relent with regard to this, I want a scum motivation behind someone saying "screw you all, I'm outta here" that has nothing to do with what that person has done in previous games.
Yes, Reck and dram are smart.
But even the smartest people can have trouble putting on a perfect facade when they are angry. Thus, the ragequit was relevant.
And I don't really care if you don't accept meta as an argument. I do, and so do plenty of other people. So if you want to vote for me for using meta (oooooohohohoho look, scary policy lynches) then go ahead and do that.
And none of this matters anymore because that was a minor point compared to what's happening now.
Oh no. Oh no you don't.SC wrote:There's a difference between what's going on, AGM. Reckamonic gave the name Henri Sardons two posts prior to the quote of mine you post, and the intervening post is not directed at Reckamonic. Therefore, I am the first person to suspect Reckamonic for tacking on the name to the claim. You, on the other hand, are taking LynchMePls's word for it that AKnottedRope is scum without question. Fine, but it'd be nice if you added something.
Reck had already claimed head of brotherhood of the wolf. This is a THEME game, and the head of the brotherhood of the wolf has a DEFINED NAME. There aren't multiple options to chose from. When xReck claimed "head of the brotherhood of the wolf," it doesn't matter that he didn't include the official namey-name because he was already locked in. He couldn't come back later and say, "oh wait guyz, JUST KIDDING, I meant that OTHER head of the brotherhood of the wolf." So you get NO EXTRA POINTS for calling that out because all the cards were already on the table. You were copying Mariyta's argument PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
Moreover, the fact that you are even trying to twist and lie to make what you said look original is scumtastic. There is no town motivation to go, "LOOK AT ME! I WAS FIRST! IT WAS MY IDEA! I CAUGHT THE SCUMZ!" Because if you're town, it doesn't matter who is catching the scum so long as they are being caught.
But you. No. You needed to get ORIGINAL CREDIT for the argument. You NEEEEEEEDED to wiggle and worm to look town. And that is scummy.
Unvote. Vote: StrangerCoug-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
I disagree.
UT is a n00b and will just keep acting scummier and eventually become confirmed scum. Or he will do something random that will make him town. It'll be easy to decide.
SCum, on the other hand, is going to go run and hide and shove all this scummy behavior under the rug. We must stop that from happening with VOTES. NOW.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
I don't care it's irreverent now.Mina wrote:Mariyta was the one who voted AKR for having posted only fluff. CooLDoG was the one arguing that it was scummy for Mariyta to vote because some people hadn't posted at all. So was AKnottedRope.
Does this change your read on Mariyta, CooLDoG, or AKnottedRope, y/n?
Depends on the situation. If everyone else is posting stuff and you are going LOLFLUFF, its scummy. If everyone is going LOLFLUFF, it' not.Mina wrote:Also, do you believe that posting fluff (as opposed to not posting at all) in the RVS is a scumtell?
Because I have seen them power through games filled with idiocy as town before because they didn't give a shit what said idiots thought. It seems like they would care more if they had more to lose (e.g., if they were scum).Mina wrote:Also, AGM, why exactly is "rage-quitting" a scumtell? Why is Reckamonic more likely to replace out when insulted as town? I actually got town vibes from the "lynch us D1 if you're going to lynch the miller at all" post. It struck the right irritated town note with me.
BUT LIKE I'VE SAID, THAT DOESN'T MATTER AS MUCH.
Now, want to be a dear and vote StrangerCoug (aka SCum), please?-
-
AlmasterGM
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Also your case is not legit because it is basically just, "you voted Reck." And as far as the answer to this goes:
He's trying to hide the fact that he's scum under pressure, obv? It's simple.Fine, because this does little to answer my question. Your use of the word "facade" implies that Reckamonic was trying to hide something, but couldn't anymore once he blew up. What the hell is it, and what makes his anger scummy?
I'm town. Idiots attack me. They gain momentum. I deal with it because I'm town so they'll look like morons and I and don't really give a shit (HAS HAPPENED IN PAST).
I'm scum. Idiots attack me. They gain momentum. I get fucking pissed off because I'm scum and they are catching me in a manner I deem illegitimate. I get angry. They keep calling me scum. I blow up and RAGEQUIT at the injustice because I'm scum and DO GIVE A SHIT.
Basically, people give a shit when they are scum. TRUE FACT.
Why this even matters at all anymore is TOTALLY beyond me.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Is that all? I want all the reasons on the table.AKR wrote:Voting without giving a reason would be one.
Sure, but to be fair, your "offense" wasn't really an argument - it was just a random one-liner. So I decided to respond by being snark.SC wrote:WIFOM, and in most games scumbuddies can't kill each other. So defending with crap.
How am I playing dodgeball? I EXPLICITLY responded to your argument IMMEDIATELY after you made it.SC wrote:No, my case is not basically "you voted Reck." I disagree that the reasoning is scummy, and when I tried to get you to prove otherwise you basically start playing dodgeball instead of Mafia. Your WIFOM is also telling me you're flailing.
If you don't LIKE my reasoning, then fine, we can sit around and argue theory all day. Or we could just drop it. Whatever. But DON'T tell me I'm playing TEEHEE dodgeball when I'm not. The responses to your "case" (which is still terrible / non-existant) are clearly posted.AlmasterGM wrote:Is it a policy lynch if we lynch people that a confirmed cop has a guilty on? Is it a policy lynch if we lynch people who lie in an anti-town matter?
NO. It's called lynching SCUM. I wasn't saying we lynch EVERYONE who replaces ALL THE TIME, I was saying, in that specific context, what xReck did was scummy because 1) he didn't give any explanation for the quit OTHER than rage and 2) I had seen him play through rage as town before.
So it's NOT A POLICY LYNCH. End of story. If you want to take this to MD afterwards I would love to. Now stop.
This is why you are scum. You keep accusing me of doing things I'm not (e.g., AGM is "policy lynching, AGM is "dodging questions," etc etc etc). You DEMAND a scum read on me, for some reason.
Well first, I disagree, but from your perspective, how is UT any different?UK wrote:I'm unimpressed with the CoolDog wagon. With all due respect he seems like a complete and utter moron. But not necessarily moronic scum.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Also you can verify. If you post a LINK to one of CooLDoG's posts and say "This is genuine, here's why," that's verifiable because I can go look at it and say, "yeah, I agree." Whereas if you just say, "CooLDoG's genunue UT's not," then that's no better than my UNSUPPORTED COOLDOG VOTE THAT EVERYONE KEEPS BRINGING UP.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Oh, so I'm scum now just because I think CooLDoG is scum? What about everyone else voting cooldog?UK wrote:Well, I can't help it if you all are letting scum lead you like damned sheep to a townie lynch. Have fun being wrong, AGM. (Well, actually, you're probably one of the scum involved. So go you, I guess?)
[/quote]
*facepalm* That's not my point. I was merely trying to demonstrate how your use of the rhetoric "policy lynch" was absurd.StrangerCoug wrote:And I told you why this answer doesn't work for me, pretty much point by point:
Nobody has claimed cop with a guilty on Reckamonic. Therefore, it makes no sense to bring into question whether it's a policy lynch to go after somebody on which a cop claimed a guilty.
I didn't imply anything. In fact, I didn't mention the miller claim at all because I don't care and it doesn't affect the read.While it's implied that you think Reckamonic's miller claim is fake when you vote him, you never directly address it, which needlessly throws me for a loop.
And most scum are going to try and play to a "town motivation" too, aren't they? But it doesn't always work, because even if you are very good player, it's hard. The same applies to meta. Sure, you are going to TRY and fake townmeta, but sometimes emotions get the best of you slip up.Metaing a good player doesn't work. You claim that something you usually see in his town play is absent, so he's scum. As most people try to play to their town meta regardless of alignment, I wanted you to supply a scum motivation for his actions.
I can't believe we are actually having this argument. If you are not scum I am going to be very disappointed in you postgame.
----
Ok, now here comes the fun.
Okay, so since you can only come up with posts from AFTER you said I was "increasing in scuminess," I'm going to assume that was your only reason (at the time, anyway - play with me for a second).AKR wrote:Overreactions like this would be two. Also I'm laughing at the utter hypocracy here.
Now, here's why that read is bad.
1) I have demonstrated a reason for voting CooLDog in Post #8. I explained this again in a later post.
2) Right above where I say, "I would be down with a CooLDoG lynch, said cooldog had just finished posting a series of incompetent and dumb posts. My displeasure with these posts is obvious based on the fact that I say I want a CooLDog lynch right after he makes them.
Now, here's why that read is scummy.
1) You come in and say "AGM is scummier." You don't explain why at all.
2) I ask you why I am scummy. You say it is because I don't justify my CooLDoG vote.
3) Ironically, at the time, YOU HADN'T JUSTIFIED YOUR READ OF ME BEING "SCUMMIER" EITHER. So, you basically just called yourself scummy.
Undoubtably, had I called you out on this right off the bat, you would have gone back and found something else I had done to cover it up. That is why I asked you for ALL the reasons I was scummy - so you couldn't pull that stunt. You didn't offer anything older, so my logic is perfectly valid.
Any questions?-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
...in that post, you just say I'm scummy because I didn't vote UT.
So both of your reasons for saying I am scum are because I didn't agree with you that someone else is scum.
And you want to call me calling you out on that a "misrep?"
bullllllllllshit.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Just like my post voting CooLDoG was right after a stupid and scummy post made by CooLDoG. BUT OH WAIT, YOU CALLED THAT SCUMMY, DIDN'T YOU?AKR wrote:1) It was right after a post of yours that was particularly scummy and opportunistic.
GOOD MOTHER OF GOD.See the bolded. Apparently, you can use that excuse just fine, but attack me for the exact same thing in your next paragraph. Ok, whatever. Scum
This ACTUALLY makes me mad. YES. YES. YES. THATS THE FUCKING POINT. YOU HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD. YOU SAY IM SCUMMY FOR VOTING COOLDOG WITH NO REASON, BUT YOU DID THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING WHEN YOU CALLED ME SUMMY.
And now I'm "floundering?" THE FUCK? I'M DESTROYING YOUR LOGIC ON EVERY LEVEL. IF ANYONE'S FLOUNDERING HERE, IT"S YOU.
SCUMLIST
COOLDOG
STRANGERCOUG
AKNOTTED ROPE-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
I actually can't believe you just said I was floundering. If anyone is floundering here, it's you. You keep coming up with new reasons why I'm scummy THAT WERE NEITHER CLEAR NOR STATED BEFORE.
THE FACT STANDS THAT IN POST POST 260-whatever YOU SAID I WAS SCUMMY WITHOUT A REASON.
THEN YOU LATER SAID THAT I WAS SCUMMY FOR VOTING WITHOUT A REASON.
And now you are changing your story entirely and calling it "waiting for the wagon to build steam," or whatever.
FLAIL AND CONTRADICT MORE, PLZ.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
"But whatever." The greatest concession line of all time.AKR wrote:There must be a reason that you waited those four posts to vote, that was my point. Goddamn. I thought I was pretty clear about that but whatever.
I'LL TAKE YOUR SURRENDER NOW, GENERAL.
Actually, it doesn't, because posting in CAPS is popular right now and I have done it as both alignments (UK can confirm, so can anyone else who has played with me). Any other reasons?AKR wrote:And I think that RAGECAPS qualifies you for flailing, AGM.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
I'm asking a player for her opinion on another player. Explain to me how this is floundering.AKnottedRope wrote:
Your vote is where, again? Which reminds me, your quip about OMGUS is baseless, given that you don't have a vote on me. What was that about floundering? Oh yeah...AlmasterGM wrote:Hey UK, how would you feel about an AKR lynch?-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
You have totally misunderstood the argument. I am not trying to defend my actions at all. My SOLE point is that AKR has a double standard and is effectively calling himself scum.COOLDOG wrote:In a catch up post here I am... I swear this is the most common logical fallacy used on this site. I can't tell you how many times I've seen this. The name of the fallacy is "You Too". While him having a double standard is bad, it does not make your actions any better.
This post actually makes me warm up to CooLDoG-town and AKR-scum.AKnottedRope wrote:
Nope. My top three are You and AGM just about tied for first with zang being a close third.CD wrote:@AKR, in your mind who isn't scum, so far acording to you UK, mary, AKM, CooLDoG (love 3rd person *punned*), SC, and zang are all scum according to you. That's about half the town comment?
Unvote. Vote: AKR-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
I'm lazy right now, but a tl;dr version isUncertainKitten wrote:UncertainKitten wrote:Um...what's the case on AKR? I'm seeing a fairly active contributor after the start of the game. He starts off parroting a lot but comes into his own, as far as I can see.
1) contradicts himself by doing stuff that he says is scummy
2) lurks when he comes under heavy fire from me
3) hasn't contributed anything of value
the reaction (2) after (1) is what's golden, really.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
It's a fairly long back and forth so it's hard to quote, but it's basically consists of this:UncertainKitten wrote:@AGM: Examples please. Feel free to quote yourself, I've certainly missed stuff.
My ISO of him didn't turn any of this up. He had a bad start but he started to at least seem like he was trying.
CooLDoG: Hai guyz, im being scummy, lol
AGM:Vote CooLDoG
AKR: AGM is scum.
AGM: Why?
AKR: You didn't justify why CooLDoG was scummy.
AGM: Neither did you. So basically you're calling yourself scum.
AKR: *FLAIL*
AGM: YOU'RE FUCKING SCUM.
AKR: (I can't talk myself out of this one, but if I lurk long enough maybe AGM will go away)-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
HRMMMMM.
Okay, here's the thing.
I am neighbors with Zang.
Now, you're probably wondering, "well okay, but that doesn't make him town." Normally, this would be true. In this case, however, SHENANIGANS occurred that strongly lead me to believe Zang was town.
This quite frankly crosses the line into what I consider acceptable play. So I've removed it. I'm now going to amend the rule list to include not discussing Timing of any Mod communications. Because quite frankly the assumptions being made in this information could be correct or absolutely wrong. And I'm not going to confirm it either way.
Please also note that this should not be considered a rebuke of AGM. I had a hole in my ruleset. It is now being corrected.
Yes, that justification is borderline unethical. I will also admit there are also a FEW other top-secret things going on right now that might draw me towards Zang-scum instead of Zang-town. But those need time to play out.
Right now, Zang lives. I demand it.Last edited by MagnaofIllusion on Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:36 am, edited 2 times in total.-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
-
-