Mini 478- Simenon's Too Much Scum: Game Over

ac1983fan · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:11 am

Original Roll String: 1d12

1 12-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

[/dice]

ac1983fan · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:12 am

gaah wait theres only 8 players...

Original Roll String: 1d8

1 8-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

ac1983fan · Post Post #13 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:12 am

vote:fonz

ac1983fan · Post Post #53 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:09 am

fos:guardian

seems to me your acting a little over-defensive, responding to anyything and everything somebody says about you on Page 2. Page 2 is generally still joke phase.

ac1983fan · Post Post #61 (isolation #4) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:20 am

Guardian wrote: ac1983, I think we've established that I've been anything
but
defensive -- where are you getting that from?
I'm sick of the joking phase. The joking phase has long been over in my mind. Jokes should die. <-dry humor, but true .

responding to anything and everything on page 2 is overdefensive in my mind...

ac1983fan · Post Post #87 (isolation #5) » Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:33 am

unvote

no need in keeping a random vote anymore

ac1983fan · Post Post #95 (isolation #6) » Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:48 am

page 4 lynch great.

ac1983fan · Post Post #98 (isolation #7) » Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:25 pm

JordanA24 wrote:Well, he was pretty obv newbscum.

he was obvious n00b. however, very n00bish behavoir doesn't always equal scum

ac1983fan · Post Post #114 (isolation #8) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:57 am

SirWario wrote:I agree with Rishi about the posting during twilight. I really don't like how Alsleet and acfan both tried to act like it was a bad move to lynch xerebz just in case he turned up townie. It is interesting because both of them never really took a firm stance on anyone on day 1.

Also, I don't like how Rishi hammered xerebz so quickly. I don't believe his replacement could have justified xerebz's actions, but I still think you made a hasty decision.

FOS:Alsleet, acfan, and Rishi

I will wait to hear their defense before voting anyone.

I didn't vote for him. I didn't get the chance to make a stance becuase day 1 took way too little time...

ac1983fan · Post Post #122 (isolation #9) » Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:08 am

SirWario wrote:Well, acfan, what do you think of the current situation now then?

what do you mean... its only page 5... I generally as a player can't make good opinions and don't play well until later in the game... if I play well at all, that is.

ac1983fan · Post Post #126 (isolation #10) » Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:34 am

I've always thought FOS'ing someone is something you do when you think they're suspisous, but not enough to vote.... That looks a little bit like craplogic...

fos:jordan

ac1983fan · Post Post #129 (isolation #11) » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:46 pm

No, I usually can't by page 5. nobody's said/done anything too particulary scummy.

ac1983fan · Post Post #140 (isolation #12) » Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:47 am

JDodge wrote:
SirWario wrote:Hey JDodge

Your analysis, while concise, seems vague. Can you give a little more detail about each point?
No. I don't like explaining my suspicions unless I feel that it is necessary to do so.

fos:jdoge

ac1983fan · Post Post #155 (isolation #13) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:45 am

nothing has changed to make me say anything else.

ac1983fan · Post Post #157 (isolation #14) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:38 am

vote:sirwario

scummiest person clearly.

ac1983fan · Post Post #160 (isolation #15) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:08 am

JordanA24 wrote:
ac1983fan wrote:
vote:sirwario

scummiest person clearly.
Why?

... are you not reading the thread?
like, everybody has said he's scummy.

ac1983fan · Post Post #164 (isolation #16) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:28 am

Rishi wrote:I haven't decided if ac1983fan is just a really bad player

pretty much, I'm a bad player until about day three... and this game went way too fast for me to actually be able to play well in it.

But I don't like how he doesn't respond to anything or give any explanation for his votes or actions. I'd rather give him another chance to explain himself before I drop the hammer. I think his lynch can still be prevented, since The Fonz is quasi-lurking in this game anyway.

What haven't I responded too?

ac1983fan · Post Post #169 (isolation #17) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:01 am

Rishi wrote:
ac1983fan wrote: pretty much, I'm a bad player until about day three... and this game went way too fast for me to actually be able to play well in it.
I find this statement surprising, because I'm surprised that you survive to Day 3 in a lot of your games.

Most games have people scummier to lynch on day one and two...

ac1983fan · Post Post #170 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:04 am

ac1983fan wrote:
Rishi wrote:
ac1983fan wrote: pretty much, I'm a bad player until about day three... and this game went way too fast for me to actually be able to play well in it.
I find this statement surprising, because I'm surprised that you survive to Day 3 in a lot of your games.
Most games have people scummier to lynch on day one and two...

EBWOP: Oh, and it doesn't help that were only on page what.. 6? so the only evidence I really have is that sirwario has been acting pretty wierd in his post... attacking me, rishi, and asleet for being overdefensive during twilight, yet I was being defensive, since I didn't even have a vote towards the lynch and thus hadf no reason to be defensive, I was jsut pissed that you all decided to go ahead and lynch when the game was just starting...

ac1983fan · Post Post #173 (isolation #19) » Sun Aug 12, 2007 5:14 am

Ughh... do you not get it! I didn't add anything on dya 1 because you guys rushed it!!!!

ac1983fan · Post Post #181 (isolation #20) » Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:38 am

unvote:Sirwario vote:rishi

reason number 1:

JordanA24 wrote:
Rishi wrote: In hindsight, we should have asked for a replacement.
To be honest, this is one of the scummiest excuses in the book, apologising for scummy behaviour and hoping others forget about it. I also found your quick hammer suspicious. But I have to agree with you, he was exceedingly scummy and to be honest, a rather bad player. I don't think it's vote worthy, especially considering how we could be, depending on the SK's choice, in a lylo situation. But, I'll
FOS: Rishi

Jordan basically spelled it out.
Reason number 2:

Rishi wrote:Keep in mind we do have a 50% shot of hitting some kind of scum right now. If someone seems scummy, they probably are. I don't see ac1983fan as Mafia, but he could be the SK.

how could someone tell the diference.
reason number three:

Rishi wrote:So, if the hammer is going to drop on ac1983fan, it is up to either me or The Fonz. I haven't decided if ac1983fan is just a really bad player or if he is a scummy player, or both.

But I don't like how he doesn't respond to anything or give any explanation for his votes or actions. I'd rather give him another chance to explain himself before I drop the hammer. I think his lynch can still be prevented, since The Fonz is quasi-lurking in this game anyway.

could be scum trying to get ready to hammer me without looking to scummy if he hammers and I show up town. "Oh, i gave him a chance..." espacially after he hammered yesterday...

that's it...

ac1983fan · Post Post #183 (isolation #21) » Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:17 pm

Rishi wrote:Well, the reason I thought you might the SK rather than the Mafia is that you were not involved in the mislynch and you seemed to be trying to fly under the radar.

But voting for the one person who was somewhat defending you? What an idiotic move.

Vote: ac1983fan

you weren't defending me.
bah go scum