Animal Crossing Mafia: Game over

TBuG · Post Post #24 (isolation #0) » Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:34 pm

Sure.

Vote: IH

TBuG · Post Post #57 (isolation #1) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:03 pm

Just so everyone knows, I bought a shovel.

TBuG · Post Post #79 (isolation #2) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:50 am

We should NOT vote no distribution. These bells can be important, and the things you buy with them. The shovel, for one, could be a very helpful item (I have one).

TBuG · Post Post #86 (isolation #3) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:54 pm

The items aren't going to be nearly as helpful for scum. We need to give them to

Someone

. Too bad he isn't playing.

Har har har, anyone who understands that gets a cookie.

TBuG · Post Post #88 (isolation #4) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:16 pm

Wizardcat wrote:Someone is another member; I know him by reading some of the other mafia games. Where's my cookie?

No cookie for you. I lied

TBuG · Post Post #106 (isolation #5) » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:23 am

That was stupid, but

Unvote; Vote: Lowell

.

I as well spent all of my bells.

TBuG · Post Post #118 (isolation #6) » Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Cloud wrote:Uhh no. Just the possibility of a doc protecting Lowell will pretty much detract the mafia from attempting to hit him. A bit of reverse psychology comes into play with this. A doc can do more good protecting someone that the mafia are likely to hit, rather then protecting someone that the mafia know will be protected and won't attempt to hit. If that all makes sense.

Called WIFOM. The mafia could do one thing, but they could do another, and some with the doctor.

TBuG · Post Post #139 (isolation #7) » Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:20 am

Vote: ubertimmy

for keeping his vote on the cop.

TBuG · Post Post #153 (isolation #8) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:08 am

Unvote; Vote: ac1983fan

Outing the cop's innocent would be EXTREMELY STUPID. He has a very big reason not to; it gives the mafia a confirmed innocent to kill.

TBuG · Post Post #155 (isolation #9) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:22 am

Oh, and

Large FoSes: N9V, IH

TBuG · Post Post #158 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:32 am

Your argument is stupidly noobish and lacks all logical sense. Yes, to the mafia everyone's a confirmed innocent, but not to the town. Whomever Lowell reveals as being innocent would be 100% safe from being lynched unless we discover that he has a different sanity, which is unlikely unless he is insane.

I really didn't expect to catch scum this early, I'm pleased with myself.

TBuG · Post Post #161 (isolation #11) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:33 am

If he is telling the truth, when he dies, we'll know his result because that's who he'll have willed his bells to.

TBuG · Post Post #163 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:23 am

I spent all of mine, sorry.

TBuG · Post Post #166 (isolation #13) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:51 pm

IH wrote:I'm also not sure why all of the blame has been shifted onto Acfan for
my
suggestion. I really don't like it.

acfan has been fighting for it more.

TBuG · Post Post #171 (isolation #14) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:31 pm

We don't have a counterclaim. Don't even try and tell me we might not have a cop at this point. Maybe later if I have a reason to disbelieve Lowell I could think so, but for now, Lowell is the most confirmed town we have, by FAR.

TBuG · Post Post #174 (isolation #15) » Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:14 pm

Unvote, Vote: IH

TBuG · Post Post #193 (isolation #16) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 pm

acfan, you are stoopid. And have a scummy character.

TBuG · Post Post #194 (isolation #17) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:51 pm

acfan:

Your idiocy is almost breathtaking. Like the Grand Canyon of human unintelligence; it's so astounding it could be a tourist attraction. Japanese people will book flights to point and stare.

TBuG · Post Post #229 (isolation #18) » Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:01 pm

Okay, I think IH is definitely scum. We should not still be discussing this.

TBuG · Post Post #239 (isolation #19) » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:17 pm

Kison basically sums up what I'm thinking.

TBuG · Post Post #242 (isolation #20) » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:56 pm

If you're asking whether or not Lowell should have claimed, HELL no.

TBuG · Post Post #253 (isolation #21) » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:14 am

IH, how will we validate it? Lynch the townie?

All things considered, I'm feeling more and more like Lowell

should

reveal his innocent just so that we can move on, but I still don't like the idea of another confirmed town (to the scum, anyway, since if Lowell IS scum he'll name a town) this early.

TBuG · Post Post #259 (isolation #22) » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:51 pm

Cleared and pretty sure are not synonymous. Cleared infers there is role evidence proving Lowell is the cop, which there is not, but that doesn't mean we can't think he's the cop.

TBuG · Post Post #268 (isolation #23) » Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:33 am

FoS: Yamahako

for his response.

I'm... actually going to side with IH on this now.

Unvote

. Lowell, your post convinced me. IH has not been riding the short bus, he's actually been arguing this very well, well enough for me to change my mind.

Lowell, reveal your innocent plzkthx.

TBuG · Post Post #274 (isolation #24) » Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:46 pm

Vote: Yamahako

Yes, let's all vote the claimed cop because we want him to reveal his 'innocent'.

TBuG · Post Post #301 (isolation #25) » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:22 pm

Cloud wrote:I never said you were in favour of lynching the cop

Rand Althor wrote:I don't like you trying to lynch the cop

Unvote, Vote Rand Althor

TBuG · Post Post #303 (isolation #26) » Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:01 pm

Hmm, am I okay with having 4 votes on him?... Yes.

TBuG · Post Post #316 (isolation #27) » Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:02 am

Unvote, Vote: Yamahako

TBuG · Post Post #328 (isolation #28) » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:02 pm

IH wrote:Pbug, why did you vote Yamahako?

a) I think he's scum, and there was no point in voting Rand Althor.
b) Your argument made sense.
c) Asparagus.

TBuG · Post Post #330 (isolation #29) » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:12 pm

I mean those are all of my reasons.

TBuG · Post Post #354 (isolation #30) » Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:34 pm

I didn't see Lowell's pre-claim cop post before I posted, so I didn't comment.

TBuG · Post Post #361 (isolation #31) » Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:22 pm

PO - Police Officer

TBuG · Post Post #377 (isolation #32) » Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:09 pm

I'm happy with my vote on Yamahako. That last post convinced me he's scum.

TBuG · Post Post #390 (isolation #33) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:05 pm

Lowell wrote:
Jules wrote: There does seem to be a lot of inactivity. I'd like to hear who Lowell is thinking is scummy just now
That's a very suspicous question to ask. My opinion doesn't mean more than anyone else's at this point, right? Or are you trying to figure out who I'll investigate?

That's not suspicious at all. Nearly everyone has said who they find suspicious in one way or another.

TBuG · Post Post #405 (isolation #34) » Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:14 am

Yamahako is scum. Please lynch him.

TBuG · Post Post #435 (isolation #35) » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:37 am

I really don't think TS is scum at this point.

TBuG · Post Post #446 (isolation #36) » Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:09 pm

~N9V~ wrote:
PBuG wrote:Yamahako is scum. Please lynch him.
Hmm, how do you know this? Are you the real cop, and Lowell is lying? Or do you just
assume
that he is. There is a huge difference, and it could help us out greatly.

Are you stupid, or just pretending to be? No, I'm not the fucking cop. I believe(d) Lowell.

TBuG · Post Post #448 (isolation #37) » Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:00 pm

I should think it's obvious that this far in I'd be expressing my want for a lynch rather than saying 'I'm a cop, here's scum.'

TBuG · Post Post #504 (isolation #38) » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:55 pm

Still here, forgot to post yesterday when I was ungrounded. reading, will post again.

TBuG · Post Post #526 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:15 am

Unvote, Vote: ubertimmy

My Yamahako vote is outdated, and ubertimmy is lurking.

TBuG · Post Post #545 (isolation #40) » Tue May 01, 2007 10:55 am

TS, your time wasn't being wasted, you were just being uncommonly dim.

TBuG · Post Post #548 (isolation #41) » Tue May 01, 2007 2:59 pm

Toaster Strudel wrote:I am uncommonly dim! Ooo-weee! That's not a new discovery. Please read my Wiki page:

http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... er_Strudel

You usually play rather intelligently. Note that I mean all of you. Even as TS you play exceptionally well.

TBuG · Post Post #551 (isolation #42) » Tue May 01, 2007 4:20 pm

Yamahako wrote:
PBuG wrote:
Toaster Strudel wrote:I am uncommonly dim! Ooo-weee! That's not a new discovery. Please read my Wiki page:

http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... er_Strudel
You usually play rather intelligently.
Note that I mean all of you
. Even as TS you play exceptionally well.
\

huh?

Only TS should understand what I said there.

TBuG · Post Post #573 (isolation #43) » Fri May 04, 2007 12:24 pm

Unvote, Vote: OTU

Um, no. That does not mesh with your actions throughout the day.

TBuG · Post Post #619 (isolation #44) » Tue May 29, 2007 9:57 am

I... Hmm. Well, we got scum yesterday... GAH. Lowell, did you get a guilty?

TBuG · Post Post #623 (isolation #45) » Tue May 29, 2007 10:15 am

Uh, no. I really don't like giving one person most, or all, of the bells. Srsly.

TBuG · Post Post #625 (isolation #46) » Tue May 29, 2007 10:18 am

Bulletin Board wrote:"Fircoal was at Yosarian2's house last night."

No bells for Fircoal/now a ranger... You're gonna need to claim awfully quick there.

TBuG · Post Post #654 (isolation #47) » Wed May 30, 2007 4:17 pm

Bells vote: Lowell

with stipulation of giving some away.

TBuG · Post Post #678 (isolation #48) » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:45 pm

I think we should still keep the board in mind, very much so.

TBuG · Post Post #682 (isolation #49) » Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:36 pm

~N9V~ wrote:
Unvote Vote Lowell
Just so we can get on with my lynch.

At least you're a good sport.

TBuG · Post Post #695 (isolation #50) » Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:40 am

Sorry, Shanba, you're wrong. But anyways:

Vote: ~N9V~

Shanba, I'll post a more convincing rebuttal later.

TBuG · Post Post #697 (isolation #51) » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:18 pm

Vote: ~N9V~

TBuG · Post Post #702 (isolation #52) » Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:24 pm

I'm voting him too.

TBuG · Post Post #719 (isolation #53) » Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:44 pm

I think so, personally.

TBuG · Post Post #761 (isolation #54) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:27 am

Shanba wrote:
Vote: PBuG

Anyways.

Vote Fircoal

because of the Bulletin Board, and I want to see how valid the posts are.

TBuG · Post Post #763 (isolation #55) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:40 am

I did, didn't I?

TBuG · Post Post #771 (isolation #56) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:13 am

now a ranger wrote:especially for voting fircoal instead of me, and voting me after Lowell did just because he had just received a vote or two himself.

Wow, that logic doesn't exist. I forgot you replaced Fircoal, and what the BULLETIN BOARD says is Fircoal. I didn't base my vote off of anyone else's vote.

vote: NAR

Since I wasn't voting a player before.

Also, I'm not sure I believe your claim; it seems way too easy to lurk, and that would make GL a bastard mod of sorts.

TBuG · Post Post #790 (isolation #57) » Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:50 am

Unvote

Hmm. Next suspicious is acfan, but I dunno.

TBuG · Post Post #828 (isolation #58) » Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:35 am

Nice logic there, Lowell. *rolls eyes*

TBuG · Post Post #851 (isolation #59) » Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:47 am

Shanba wrote:so uh, I got prodded. Hi. Let's get a wagon going on TS or PBuG kthanks.

Too bad I'm not scum...

However, I have been getting scummy vibes from TS repeatedly, and the people I want lynched probably won't be.

Unvote, Vote: TS

TBuG · Post Post #861 (isolation #60) » Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:10 am

Oooh.

Unvote, vote: HackerHuck

TBuG · Post Post #951 (isolation #61) » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:01 am

I'm still here, I'll post with content tomorrow.

TBuG · Post Post #956 (isolation #62) » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm

/agree with TS.

TBuG · Post Post #960 (isolation #63) » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:34 pm

Um, vote stays. This is the third cop claim we've had, and the second 'cop' that didn't counterclaim Lowell. We lynched ~N9V~ on the grounds that he claimed cop and we didn't see that as feasible.

TBuG · Post Post #987 (isolation #64) » Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:12 pm

I changed my mind. The progression of the posts convinced me to change my mind twice. I've found myself changing my mind a lot in this game. More than most. Look at my past games, I do this a lot as town. I don't always give sufficient reasoning, either. I'm much more careful as scum.