Mini 1404 - Monopoly Mafia - Game Over

[Lord Mhork]

I know he hadn't read the self vote, but the giant post with the inconsistency and general IIoA is what sparked his 'town' read.

[Jal]

If he is telling the truth about not reading the thread, then that's probably why: he doesn't realize what the inconsistencies are.

Has anyone replaced Robert yet? Lurker's first change of vote on him doesn't look like the two would be connected.

With Uber's lack of reading and and Medhi's lack of anything, this all seems useless bleh.

VOTE: Lurker

Someone will still have to hammer at some point anyway.

[Lurker]

I'll help you out here UberDuber:

My 1-shot ability Is watcher.

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

Whoa whoa whao. STOP THE THREAD. Did anyone else actually read what Lurker wrote in his big posts?

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

PLEASE DO EXPLAIN THIS TO ME, LURKER FRIEND

Truant: "[...] scum can play really well and only make one mistake. That's all that is necessary as not every post will be scummy. All you need is one solid slip and you can find scum.

VOTE: LURKER

You forgot the intensly sarcastic things that made argument with fixed mindsets useless since you would not think such things seriously.

Vote: Jal

[TehBrawlGuy]

I'll help you out here UberDuber:

My 1-shot ability Is watcher.

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

Whoa whoa whao. STOP THE THREAD. Did anyone else actually read what Lurker wrote in his big posts?

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

PLEASE DO EXPLAIN THIS TO ME, LURKER FRIEND

Truant: "[...] scum can play really well and only make one mistake. That's all that is necessary as not every post will be scummy. All you need is one solid slip and you can find scum.

VOTE: LURKER

You forgot the intensly sarcastic things that made argument with fixed mindsets useless since you would not think such things seriously.

Vote: Jal

Get your vote back on yourself so we can get this over with.

[Jal]

I don't think that even makes English sense.

[Jal]

Got a chance card where I advanced to the nearest railroad. Oh yes I did.

[Guy_Named_Riggs]

Current Vote Count 1.11

Lurker - 5 (Lord Mhork, numberQ, Agent_Ireland, TehBrawlGuy, Jal) (L-2)

Jal - 4 (Robert2424, Robert2424, UberNinja, Lurker) (L-3)
Baby Spice - 2 (Mehdi2277, Cheery Dog) (L-5)
Mehdi2277 - 1 (Baby Spice) (L-6)
Cheery Dog - 1 (Xisiqomelir) (L-6)

Not Voting:

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch
Deadline is in

(expired on 2013-01-12 14:10:00)

~Cheery Dog replaces StrangerCoug~

[Cheery Dog]

Hi there
Baby Spice, I apparently have you as my scumread, can you tell me why? (or Mehdi who has probably a different reason for being on that same wagon?)

Though I'll probably get around to reading this thread over the weekend if it's not too boring. I can't remember what happened in the first however many pages I tried to read when this game first started, so I can't even really comment on those. Anything else I should know now before I attempt to decipher what you people have been talking about for 30 pages?

[Jake from State Farm]

Lurker claimed watcher, later slipped and said he claimed tracker. He's caught scum, vote him

[Mehdi2277]

So knowing that Lurker is probably scum does not change your opinion whatsoever on anything? You've been thinking Lurker is town all this time and arguing against me about him being scum, and none of your reads change as a result?

What reads of mine were based on him or should change? Spice doesn't change considering she was never one of the people voting him and tried to get a wagon on you based on your vote on him. I didn't scum reads on the people voting him, so anything that should be changing?

Continuing uber how much sense does she make as a lurker partner? She was the first person to vote him, pushed him quite a bit, and now he's nearly confirmed scum and that's nowhere in your read of jal.

Before I forget I did get a card saying I got 100 dollars. Hasn't done anything that I notice.

Cheery jal actually posted a case, but the short version is she finds something jal did bs -> she analyzes the wagon jal is on -> she then votes jal for having a bs vote and supports it with statistics she never shows and tried to shift the burden of proof on the statistics to jal.

Vote wise considering lurker can self hammer if I vote him I'll let him at L-2 so people can say whatever else and then have him lynched tomorrow (extending the day too much doesn't help anyone so if you have something you want to say just say it).

[TehBrawlGuy]

Notably, that means Town probably does not have either of those powers.

[Mehdi2277]

Oh and adding jake how am I scummy for defending lurker a lot? I thought he was town so I defended him. I gave reasons for the defense back then too that you could have argued more at the time if you didn't believe them and found him scummiest.

Tbg role spec probably won't help considering the nature of the role (and I think people said to not cc even if you were a watcher). Multiple people with the same role when it's 1 shot is something I find believable.

[Jake from State Farm]

Putting words into my mouth? I never said anything about you defending anyone. I just said you are obvious partner.

[Mehdi2277]

I'm assuming that's why. So why is it?

[Jake from State Farm]

Gut

[Mehdi2277]

And can you explain the gut? Which part of my interactions with lurker was it?

[Mehdi2277]

I also find associative gut to be strange. How would you define gut?

[Jake from State Farm]

Maybe tomorrow, too much work to do when this day phase will be over soon. There was a post early on that looked like role fishing that I want to re-read to see if I didn't read it wrong. If I did my gut read may change. Your early defense of Lurker doesn't help your case any

[Jake from State Farm]

Gut is when I see your posts I cringe, I don't feel they come from town. That's gut

[Mehdi2277]

I still don't see how the defense is bad beyond it being with someone who's mafia. If you want to quote the defense itself and show me what points seem fake sure, but currently it sounds like arguing that I was wrong to have him as a town read makes me more likely scum with him.

Not sure what you're referring to about role fishing although I think I did discuss reaction fishing near the beginning of the game.

[Cheery Dog]

Lurker claimed watcher, later slipped and said he claimed tracker. He's caught scum, vote him

That is good information to know, and what I was looking for by asking my last question. I guess the other ones can wait for answers tomorrow, as caught scum is way better than voting someone for I don't know what information.
I will agree that he is indeed caught for the way he posted after it was first identified.

Cheery jal actually posted a case, but the short version is she finds something jal did bs -> she analyzes the wagon jal is on -> she then votes jal for having a bs vote and supports it with statistics she never shows and tried to shift the burden of proof on the statistics to jal.

That'll probably need me to read the thread to understand. If it's true, there's always tomorrow. (unless death of course)

Less scum and a quiet night (well except screaming from people dying during it) sounds like a good time for me to read the thread anyway.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Lurker

[Lurker]

I'll help you out here UberDuber:

My 1-shot ability Is watcher.

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

Whoa whoa whao. STOP THE THREAD. Did anyone else actually read what Lurker wrote in his big posts?

#307 I say the eletric company is 1-shot Tracker.

PLEASE DO EXPLAIN THIS TO ME, LURKER FRIEND

Truant: "[...] scum can play really well and only make one mistake. That's all that is necessary as not every post will be scummy. All you need is one solid slip and you can find scum.

VOTE: LURKER

You forgot the intensly sarcastic things that made argument with fixed mindsets useless since you would not think such things seriously.

Vote: Jal

Get your vote back on yourself so we can get this over with.

Why? If I am truly scum, you will lynch me.

Self-hammering becuase of a sarcasm offensive is not doing anything but making this a miserable experience.

If I was truly sick of this game, I would have shown the information above, but I didn't.

I'm getting closer and clsoer to that tipping point in which I accidentaly out all my allies that I know in this thread because It went faster then I wanted to go.

[Mehdi2277]

Cheery can you hold on the lurker vote? I'd rather just let 1 day go for last comments so people know the day's going to end soon in advance vs just voting him now where he'll likely self hammer when he's online next.

P-edit: Or now depending on when he votes.

[Jake from State Farm]

I still don't see how the defense is bad beyond it being with someone who's mafia. If you want to quote the defense itself and show me what points seem fake sure, but currently it sounds like arguing that I was wrong to have him as a town read makes me more likely scum with him.

Not sure what you're referring to about role fishing although I think I did discuss reaction fishing near the beginning of the game.

I'm watching football, I'll explain more day 2

[Jal]

UNVOTE: