MeMeMeet Mafia (Game Over!)

Atticus · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:46 pm

Hey y'all, I got the Pepperoni bread and home made pizza!

Atticus · Post Post #45 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:32 am

*Wasn't at MeMeMeet very much, so it's hard to roleplay lemuel.*

Atticus · Post Post #58 (isolation #2) » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:48 am

Random.org sas... 4.

Vote:spork76

Now, let's see if he flips out over having two votes.

Atticus · Post Post #59 (isolation #3) » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:49 am

I

meant

3. I'm a dummy.

Atticus · Post Post #74 (isolation #4) » Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:46 am

jeep wrote:
unvote: vote: Fritzler
on a hunch that I'm hoping doesn't work out... It can't be that MeMe/Dirge/Fletch are the mafia, right?

And I said "I" meaning "me" not meaning me.

Why can't

I

be one of the scum? What makes the rest of my family so special?

Atticus · Post Post #84 (isolation #5) » Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:53 am

Thank you kristocker, now I feel accepted.

Atticus · Post Post #93 (isolation #6) » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:40 am

It doesn't look like spork has returned yet. What's the deal?

Atticus · Post Post #94 (isolation #7) » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:56 am

I must pose a question: You

must

vote for a favorite Things response, right? And are your guesses not counted if you do not send one in?

Atticus · Post Post #103 (isolation #8) » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:06 pm

Uhm, interestingk. Very interesting, I notice Pooky

has

posted at least in pre-game, but yes, very interesting. Lurkers!

Atticus · Post Post #108 (isolation #9) » Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:23 am

Oh, Pooky? You're worried about being sold out for points?

Atticus · Post Post #134 (isolation #10) » Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:31 am

I'll make a short list of why i'm voting for you.

1.) That whole Colorado thing with "probably wouldn't post much anyway".

2.) random. org told me so.

3.) That one picture of you as the spawn of Satan.

4.)It's really only 3 pages, considering pre-game. Pre-game lasted 1.5 pages. You said you'd start reading at the beginning of page 5.

Now

the game is around 4 pages long, which is still absolutely not 5. And besides, you can probably read 10 pages of this type in about, uh, an hour? Fletcher voted you when it had been 2 days since that post and now it's 3 days from that post, and neither of your posts have been of any input.

Atticus · Post Post #142 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:23 am

Wow, I'm even more convinced spork is scum.

He seems to know there are terrorists, or that the scum are called terorists, and mlaker, did you tell him that you are scum?

So, spork has claimed that he is a plain townie who doesn't want to lynch anybody.

AWESOMEST Confirm Vote: Spork76

Atticus · Post Post #148 (isolation #12) » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:47 am

Severl people have already explained why they're voting for you, spork, why are you still complaining?

Atticus · Post Post #154 (isolation #13) » Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:58 am

Sounded like something you would say...

Atticus · Post Post #156 (isolation #14) » Thu Aug 03, 2006 5:09 am

I also notice only 15 votes in that last votecount...

So that means Pooky, spork, Maverick, and Fishbulb not voting? Hmm!

Atticus · Post Post #164 (isolation #15) » Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:52 am

Well, that vote was

originally

random. It's sort of changed into something stable and cool and knowing. Yes, I am justifying, but this is what I do most of the time, add on to my vote for why and why they are scummier and scummier.

I don't see how you can call this a "picking on spork wagon" when you are voting for spork. If you're going to defend him, unvote, or else this carries aboslutely no weight, at least, in my opinion.

As to, what convinced me in the first place, I wasn't convinced in the

first

place, I was convinced in about oh, the third place. What with the 'jokes' and not keeping up with his uh, saying that he would post after reading a 3 page game.

I know this is too soon to go out and guess a scum group or anything, but I want to make it a possibility that spork, and Fletch are two of the scum? Add in mlaker too?

Atticus · Post Post #174 (isolation #16) » Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:22 am

ibaesha, him posting doesn't kill the point, especially when he's posting things that are entirely scummy. He's a good beginning wagon, and also a good kill wagon. Do we stop killing scum because they start being scummy? Nay!

I dislike how both you and Fletch make the same point. "He's joking, your reasons are crap." But I'm the only one gettin' hate because I'm the only one defending my vote and giving reasons for it.

Atticus · Post Post #184 (isolation #17) » Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:45 pm

Well, Thesp, you make a good point.

Atticus · Post Post #189 (isolation #18) » Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:40 am

Obviously my reasons weren't enough to suffice for the requirement of

someone

?

Atticus · Post Post #230 (isolation #19) » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:05 am

Unvote, Vote: Fletcher

He's just been my second choice. And yes Fletcher, I tried to over-explain my vote on spork, because I feel foolish if it's just because I think he is scum. So that was a simple explanation.

PM the mod! Tell him to lengthen.

Atticus · Post Post #233 (isolation #20) » Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:12 am

Grood, now let's lynch someone in this time.

Atticus · Post Post #245 (isolation #21) » Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:12 am

Thesp, how about this. They said that if they have less points than a certain person, they may investigate. Obviouskly, on Night 1, everyone would have the same points. So his role would not be activated and he could not use it!

And I just noticed that Yoko and Yosarian pointed this out. Thesp, why do you think that your ability is to investigate

activated

roles? Tothrow us off guard, to break lies. But it's pretty clear that they're suposed investigation isn't available yet.

Atticus · Post Post #251 (isolation #22) » Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:34 pm

Thesp, I feel that you're pro-town, but I dislike your one track set of, "Let's lynch this guy he's lying 'cause there's no way I'm wrong. "

How about we lynch Fletch, find out he's scum, and go from there, right?

I just think you're unacceptance of these pointed facts is stupid. I think if we lynch Yosarian we'd be making a bad mistake, as per there claim.

And besides, wouldn't scum or SK,

have

an activated ability? The one to kill at night?

Atticus · Post Post #258 (isolation #23) » Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:05 am

Why kill Fletcher? We're reaching deadline, not killing is bad. Spork and Yosarian have confirmed each others innocence, and it takes to long to shift to anything else.

Atticus · Post Post #260 (isolation #24) » Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:25 am

And also, Fletch isn't defending himself.

Atticus · Post Post #265 (isolation #25) » Sat Aug 12, 2006 3:49 am

Geeehhhh!!! We need to do this fast.

Atticus · Post Post #274 (isolation #26) » Sat Aug 12, 2006 12:16 pm

We're not going to be able to lynch anyone, will we? I just see no point in letting the scum stay alive when so pinned. But with so many people doing nothing, it's going to be hard to lynch

anyone

, let alone scum.

Atticus · Post Post #284 (isolation #27) » Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:58 am

Jeep! You can't catch up tomorrow! Today's deadline! We've only really got one person we will be able to lynch because of inactivity! And he isn't really defending himself, claiming or what. Tiiiime is running out!

Atticus · Post Post #286 (isolation #28) » Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:07 am

Yeah, well, he said he'd catch up tomorrow, when tomorrow could be a while away. And I probably should have placed a line in between some of that post, because it was alotly pointed at everyone.

Atticus · Post Post #301 (isolation #29) » Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:37 pm

Isn't Yosarian2 dead, Thesp? This game is too confusing to me. I can't figure out who's dying.

Atticus · Post Post #315 (isolation #30) » Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:33 am

Well, Thesp, want to explain why?

And Yosarian, are you still alive?

Atticus · Post Post #334 (isolation #31) » Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:12 am

Yay! Vacation was quite fun, but it's better to be back.

And Thesp, that still doesn't answer Dirge.

Atticus · Post Post #337 (isolation #32) » Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:53 am

I pushed the Fletchlynch because he was probably the only lynch we were gonna have a chance at getting. I would perhaps call my suspicion of spork conjured, say, conjured by spork. But you'll notice, please, that I instantly backed off after the claim. That's it.

Atticus · Post Post #353 (isolation #33) » Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:25 am

Thesp wrote:I don't buy it. Happy with my Atticus vote.

I realize that it may not seem necessary to you, but when someone's voting me, I prefer it when I have a good idea of why they're voting for me. My point being, please explain what is you don't buy in some sort of depth.

However, I'm not sure I want to vote Thesp, I think his claim as a sort of cop is probably true, he just misinterpreted what it did. However, MeMe, I do sort of feel a Pooky vote.

Atticus · Post Post #357 (isolation #34) » Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:37 am

Hemhem, Thesp.

Atticus · Post Post #359 (isolation #35) » Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:41 pm

Thesp, do you have to post right after me and not answer my question twice in a row? It's annoying and makes me suspicious of some sort of role variant.

Atticus · Post Post #361 (isolation #36) » Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:34 pm

*Sighs heavily*

I mean the explanation of what you don't buy which I asked for about 8 posts back from this one.

Where's Spork?

Atticus · Post Post #366 (isolation #37) » Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:40 am

Thesp! *angry expletive here* it!

Atticus · Post Post #372 (isolation #38) » Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:48 am

I unvoted him the first time I posted, after spork had claimed. And for some reason, I hadn't checked mafiascum, or just this thread or what, and I can't really defend that, but yeah.

So thanks for finally answering it, FINALLY.

Atticus · Post Post #378 (isolation #39) » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Oh, come on people, another deadline? *snaps fingers repeatedly* Come on, come on, let's go, let's go!

Atticus · Post Post #389 (isolation #40) » Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:14 am

Hmmm, I just don't think it makes sense to lynch Thesp, with his claim, I think he just makes horribly exploitable mistakes.

Buuut..... I see good enough reason to vote Pooky.

Vote: Pooky

Atticus · Post Post #414 (isolation #41) » Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:59 pm

I am going to ask for extension after I p-p-p-post.

Thesp, why don't you have info from last night?

And pooky, I think, as others have pointed out, your defense of Thesp indicates something to me, you might have known he was a good guy, because yer scum, buddyup, or he could've been your scumbuddy. But now you say you'd be happy with a vig-hit? Rapid throwing under the bus!

Atticus · Post Post #423 (isolation #42) » Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:18 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm glad you're contributing to the game Olio, what does voting fletcher to get a lynch in on time have to do with following Thesp?

IF it wasn't more clear from my post about Night 0, I have a noninvestigative nightchoice that's quite confirmable.

It was more of the, blindly following Thesp and voting Yosarian based solely on Thesp's misguided word. Which seemed like following Thesp and saying

Pooky wrote:
unvote
vote Yosarian2

Huzzah!

With no extra comment after his big explanation of why we should vote Yosarian2 without thinking about Thesp or Yosarian's role. Very oppurtunistic.

Atticus · Post Post #428 (isolation #43) » Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:49 pm

Or, it's possible that Thesp's just recently gone insane, and... it's een showing through in this game?

Atticus · Post Post #434 (isolation #44) » Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:54 am

Er, Spork, mlaker, this is what the green cards went, (as far as I can remember from a certain game) yeah, okay.

There were like four power roles in this one gamewe played, okay? Roleblocker, cop, doc, and vig. One of these was taken out and replaced with a green card, which would be a lessened version of that. But this person would know nothing!

Here are what I think happens.

The vig can only kill towns ( I know this because that was the one in the game at MeMeMeet)

The doc can only protect scum.

The cop.... insane maybe? I can't think of what this handicap would be.

The roleblocker can only block pro-town roles.

If this person chose to do something they could not, they would get no result, nada, say if a vig tried to kill a scum, he would just get a shake of the head. But I assume then maybe he'd get a "no" in a pm or perhaps nothing on the site, I don't know.

Atticus · Post Post #435 (isolation #45) » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:01 am

I think we serial need to do something before this deadline. I'm super serial.

And Dirge, I don't think the game would be over, or that would seem pretty stupid... to me.

Atticus · Post Post #437 (isolation #46) » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:36 pm

I guess... but it just seems like a wasted kill to me.

As far as I can guess, the jester sn't scum or town, he just wins if he is lynched, or that's what I've been assuming. But I think that then, two groups can win, whether it be jester and town, or jester and mafia.

Atticus · Post Post #442 (isolation #47) » Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:05 am

Ummmmm, people?

12 noon (eastern time) tomorrow is our deadline, yes?

So if we don't do something..... we're gonna what? Get a no-lynch. Er, if that's what we wan't,m it's okay, but I don't think it is for us, righto.

Atticus · Post Post #444 (isolation #48) » Sat Sep 02, 2006 4:21 pm

We lynched Fletcher yesterday... unless you mean real live days in which we failed to lynch. Which wouldn't make sense to me... so is it right to assume that you made a mistake with this post?

Atticus · Post Post #460 (isolation #49) » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:20 am

Killer

I think that means that they kill. Not that they are specifically mafia.

I beleive that Dirge is a sort of cult leader, and MeMe was recruited as a zombie. I'm imagining that she had some other role or power, and when she became a zombie, she lost it.

Bogus? It's just the vibe I'm gettting.

Atticus · Post Post #467 (isolation #50) » Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:37 am

No, not necessarily...

And Thesp, I do not have an activated ability.

Atticus · Post Post #471 (isolation #51) » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:35 am

Well.... I don't think you are. Something about my role leads me to beleive that you are not scum. But I see no reason to claim right now.

Atticus · Post Post #474 (isolation #52) » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:12 pm

Awww how special, Fritz.

And on the subject of Pooky, I missed a question he had for me.

I'm not voting for Dirge... because he's not specifically scum. The cult needs to kill everyone? Right? That seems like a less iminent danger than scum, which need a majority.

Atticus · Post Post #486 (isolation #53) » Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:13 am

Um, Dirge, why are you voting Pooky, when you're quoting MoS and, assumed, talking to MoS?

I'm sorry, I've never played with a cult. I just figured that since the dawn scene said KILLERS, and since I had assumed that zombie was a sort of cult, I was all like, "Oh! The cult must be able to kill!" But with what I have been told, this means that MeMe was not a cult person? So, has anyone got an idea on what a zombie

could

be?

Atticus · Post Post #495 (isolation #54) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:13 am

Vote: Atticus

Someone's gotta fight, eh? And I'm likin' to try it! Hoo-ah!

Atticus · Post Post #497 (isolation #55) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:10 pm

So... you're assuming that you're not the cult leader? Good.

Atticus · Post Post #505 (isolation #56) » Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 am

MeMe should be my combatant.

Atticus · Post Post #508 (isolation #57) » Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:11 pm

Atticus · Post Post #513 (isolation #58) » Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:25 am

Anyone wanna volunteer? Anyone wanna volunteer someone else?

Atticus · Post Post #529 (isolation #59) » Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:30 pm

Weee-ellll. Someone has to die in this Deatmatch, so I want someone I think is scummy, but also someone I think I can beat.

I just noticed also, I cannot choose Dirge Quag, olio, Fishbulb or MGIA for some reason.

FoS: Dirge, Quagmire, olio, Fishbulb and MGIA.

With that in mind,

Challenge: mlaker

. Based on no reasoning.

Atticus · Post Post #543 (isolation #60) » Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:14 am

Hmmmm, uh-oh.

Atticus · Post Post #553 (isolation #61) » Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:27 am

Play 3 on my Hit Stat.

Atticus · Post Post #583 (isolation #62) » Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:13 pm

I haven't got.

I've got two swears, a 9 and a 3.

Atticus · Post Post #586 (isolation #63) » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:16 am

Pooky! mlaker!

Atticus · Post Post #590 (isolation #64) » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:56 am

Nothing blockshim from putting it where it should go. He just tried to put it in thew wrong spot, which was blocked. C'mon mlaker!!!! C'mon Pooks!

Atticus · Post Post #592 (isolation #65) » Sat Sep 23, 2006 4:32 pm

*frustrated*

the GREAT all-modding MOD wrote:
Mod Note:
SeÃ±or Roboto's Hit already has a tile on it, so a new one can not be played unless it is erased.

But you did the write thing. Which is good.

Atticus · Post Post #596 (isolation #66) » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:59 am

Okay, now play it, mlaker.

Atticus · Post Post #606 (isolation #67) » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:07 am

Perrrrrrfect.

Atticus · Post Post #612 (isolation #68) » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:25 pm

Whoop.

Atticus · Post Post #629 (isolation #69) » Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:17 am

I'm with MrBuddyLee?

Hmm.

Attack mlaker with... the candlestick.

Atticus · Post Post #632 (isolation #70) » Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:32 pm

You know, the HAND OF ULTIMATE DEATH really hurts.

I'm going to have to get you back for that next time around, Pooky.

Atticus · Post Post #636 (isolation #71) » Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:36 am

MBL, what say we stay?

Atticus · Post Post #646 (isolation #72) » Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:49 pm

Of course I'd stay, MBL.

You're kitty avatar is too cute to lie to.

Atticus · Post Post #647 (isolation #73) » Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:51 pm

In other words, I'm staying.

And attacking Dirge with Books too complicated to read.

Atticus · Post Post #657 (isolation #74) » Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:32 am

Anonymities, I'd say we can both easily benefit from staying.

And from your behavior last round, that's nay too hard, no?

And MBL, I think you should make Ibby feel better by staying.

Atticus · Post Post #667 (isolation #75) » Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:18 pm

Why Pooky?

Why do you want Pooky to be slapped?

Have you got something against Pooky...?

'Cause if you do, there's no reason for me to trust you...

Atticus · Post Post #679 (isolation #76) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:51 am

I have a random paranoia....

Attack mith-mod with Pepperoni bread.

I'm just... interested.

Atticus · Post Post #685 (isolation #77) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:12 am

Yay anonny!

Pooky has very good reasoning. And seeing as I'm not voting for anybody and because I see no reason not to...

I'm making lame excuses for making this vote.

I'll just make a vote.

Vote: Fishbulb.

Atticus · Post Post #688 (isolation #78) » Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:36 pm

No, no, no, no. It was spork who had heatray vision.

Atticus · Post Post #695 (isolation #79) » Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:59 am

ibaesha wrote: ...
I think Atticus just insists on being scummy.
...

Everyone says this about me, well most people do, I kinda want a little more explanation.

Atticus · Post Post #708 (isolation #80) » Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:35 pm

I trust Pooky's judgejemtn, myself, but I find it hard to beleive that so many people would join Pooky for just that reason.

Atticus · Post Post #709 (isolation #81) » Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:36 pm

II knew I should have checked my spelling.

If you didn't guess, that's supposed to be judgement.

Atticus · Post Post #725 (isolation #82) » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:26 am

Good job, Pooky.

Dirge, he's got a point, without any explanation, your FOS is highly provocative and suspicious.

Atticus · Post Post #729 (isolation #83) » Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:57 pm

No, no, no. Quag agrees that Dirge has to go to work.

Atticus · Post Post #735 (isolation #84) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:16 am

Hmmm, so this is going to be an interesting game (I'm the Boss). By the look of the thing, Poky and olio are all alone, with no family members.

2 of Diamonds

Attack Anonymities with a Hadouken Fireball.

Atticus · Post Post #745 (isolation #85) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:55 am

3 of Diamonds

Atticus · Post Post #750 (isolation #86) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:21 pm

4 of Diamonds

Muhuhahahaha!!

Atticus · Post Post #751 (isolation #87) » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:44 pm

5 of Diamonds

Atticus · Post Post #756 (isolation #88) » Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:05 am

6 of Diamonds!

Atticus · Post Post #761 (isolation #89) » Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:54 am

Ace of Diamonds.

Atticus · Post Post #764 (isolation #90) » Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:13 pm

8 of Diamonds

Atticus · Post Post #774 (isolation #91) » Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:14 am

Huh.

It's back, but no one seems to want to discuss any theories they thought up over the break?

Gosh, everyone's just randomly voting. What is the point to this?

Atticus · Post Post #776 (isolation #92) » Fri Oct 27, 2006 5:42 pm

I'm sorry, that wasn't my point.

What I was trying to say was: Why aren't we doing anything new? For goodness sake, the crash barely affected THIS game. You can be thankful for that, and you can be ponderous about that.

Sure, a way to win this game is by having the most points, but why can't we be trying to make the town win as well? And again, sure, voting for who you think is scum is in a way, trying to help, but can we make a lynch without an agreement?

No!

Dirge had a good point, I didn't even see it then! We're not concentrating on the

game

, we're concentrating on the

games

! If more than one person's going to win this, we're going to have to do more about his game.

Atticus · Post Post #778 (isolation #93) » Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:38 am

Oh, good point.

I really haven't done much.

Vote: Dirge

And I beleive that Quagmire is suspicious, but I feel not the need to vote for him

I think it's weird Pooky so easily spotted Fishbulb, but maybe he's a cop, maybe he's scumI don't know, I just don't think he's the latter right now.

Atticus · Post Post #780 (isolation #94) » Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:04 am

Convince us?

Atticus · Post Post #790 (isolation #95) » Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:16 am

Okay.... While I'm not going to bother answering everything in Pooky's post, let me first make a claim.

I'm a point-whore

. The person I had to get more points than to get an investigation, was Thesp. That was never possible, because I had always topped him in points. This led me to assume that Thesp was pro-town. And with a claim like activted-ability-cop, I figured well, why lynch him?

MeMe was not scum, she was some other form of killer, a zombie. Had I been scum, there is no way I would have known that MeMe was also a fiend. And furthermore, if I had, I would have been pushing to kill her.

That's what he said about the green card, doesn't sound like something a green card townie would say, that's assuming green cards are actually townies which is something I'd expect Fishbulb to have known because it'd be ludicriously stupid to make a remark like that if he was completely wrong cuz he'd easily be caught out if a single vanilla townie said, "wait im not a green card! die!"

Not to try and cop out of answering this, or anything, but what does all this mean? In basic terms.

You also state that I vote Fishbulb based on your reasoning. Reasoning that, for the most part, applies to me. In actuality, a lot of it does. But if I can think properly, why would there be any reason to vote my scumbuddy? As you said yourself, why would I simply want to throw someone under the bus? What is the point? You yourself said that this would damage me, or you, if you would be scum. Unless of course you are scrapping this theory.

You're accusing me of taking advantage and trying to buddy-up to you? You can't possibly say that you're not taking advantage of being the buddy. Right now you're EVERYONE'S buddy. (except for Dirge apparently.) You have sole position over who gets lynched, because everyone can trust good old Pooky, heck, he got us a scum single-handedly,and who's got any better ideas, and well, like he said himself, there's no reason to kill his own partners. And if that's not taking advantage of something by your terms, you better change your book.

I want to point out something to EVERYONE. Going into Night 2, Kris tocker and Fish were the point leaders. Kristocker died that night.

Two days later, Fish is the point leader. He is killed single-handedly by Pooky.

Today, I am the point-leader, and I am about to get killed. I don't give a crap if I'm lynched today for being the point leader. But I do care if Pooky's gonna lynch me. For reasons like this.

Atticus · Post Post #794 (isolation #96) » Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:26 am

Quagmire wrote:NICE ONE, Atticus! Now we can finally kill Pooky!

I am not in anyway implying that Pooky is absototalutely scum. I just want to keep those reminders open.

Atticus · Post Post #798 (isolation #97) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:19 am

I'm not entirely sure myself. It could have been to assure myself that I was on the ball, or there could be some reasoning that I've forgotten now.

Sory for answering that so late.

Unvote

Atticus · Post Post #809 (isolation #98) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:56 am

So, if you're saying that you're also useless, why aren't you saying that you should be vigged?

Atticus · Post Post #810 (isolation #99) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:01 am

Attack Quag with a Rabid Puffin Dingo!

Atticus · Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:31 am

Influence: Wilbur Wadsworth

Atticus · Post Post #817 (isolation #101) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:11 am

Apparently I can... I've got Wadsworth influence on my side.

Why wouldn't I be able to? What about that section of the rules made you think that I wouldn't?

Atticus · Post Post #818 (isolation #102) » Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:14 am

You know, what the heck.

Pooky isn't even dealing with me anymore. He's moved on to Quagmire. I think that lack of confidence that I could be scum could be a scum-tell. I usually don't say scum-tell, but I will when I feel like it!

Vote: PookyTheMagicalBear

Atticus · Post Post #823 (isolation #103) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:44 pm

Then why are you still voting me?

Atticus · Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:53 pm

And the Internet-ettiquette-police arrest Pooky for prolificaly typing in all caps.

Now that that's taken care of, I personally think that you, Pooky, should consider your current stance. You have just flipped out at someone for posting about why you were scum. You have just made yourself an unpleasant spectacle after yesterday's Town Hero.

In my eyes, you're scum for attacking me with no difference in reasoning to Fishbulb, who was scum, when I know I'm not scum.

In Dirge and Quag's eyes, I'm assuming they think you're scum for using the same technique and lying about certain things.

What IS this technique THEY are talking about? What IS the technique YOU are talking about? And what is the technique I am talking about? Let's hope that we can ALL agree on what this technique is, and resolve this conflict.

MY idea of what this technique is, the one that you have used on me and Fishbulb, (admitted by you, testified by others) is taking exacty what you said about Fishbulb (lurking, not posting any content, being the leader of points, etc., etc.,) and applying it to the person you find most scummy or oppurtunistic to lynch (based on your alignment) and dive at it with guns blazing.

Hopefully that's what we all mean.

Atticus · Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:54 pm

And olio, his case isn't against Quag right now, it's against me.

Atticus · Post Post #842 (isolation #106) » Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:52 am

And I really didn't want to play my cards...

Attack Pooky with a Sledgehammer

Atticus · Post Post #843 (isolation #107) » Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:53 am

I'm The Boss!

Atticus · Post Post #844 (isolation #108) » Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:02 am

Sorry for all these little posts.

Pooky, I want a roleclaim or it's a deal.

Atticus · Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:29 am

I guesss it would have been a smarter play for me to have lynched him right then and there. Now I just look like a scum trying to be as cautious as possible. Oh well.

But Anonymities, you've now spoiled the chance of getting a roleclaim outta Pooky.

Atticus · Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:14 am

You're referring to me as a townie? Or to Pooky as a townie, Anonymities?

Atticus · Post Post #858 (isolation #111) » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:49 pm

Pooky, I just thought I'd inform you of what I think yo've been doing.

Since you've flipped out, all you've done is dig yourself into such a hole, that you can't climb out now. By simply spewing "craplogic" and "THIS IS IN ALL CAPS SO I'M WINNING" it's just that, before you flipped out, I thought you could be townie, even after you voted me. But now I feel almost sure that you're scum.

Atticus · Post Post #864 (isolation #112) » Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:04 am

No, I meant that you're acting scummier and scummier in the eyes of the people that think you're scummy already. Now THEY have a ton of points they can use against you whenever they like, and they already have.

Influence: Wanda Wadsworth

And Pooky, I'd like you and Quagmire to say what you thinkthis "TECHNIQUE" is.

Atticus · Post Post #869 (isolation #113) » Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:38 pm

Come on Pooky, as if that's valid?

Atticus · Post Post #873 (isolation #114) » Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:18 am

Dangit, what a waste of Bosscard, I couldn't even have used it?

Atticus · Post Post #875 (isolation #115) » Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:40 am

So... you're never going to place a deal then?

Atticus · Post Post #877 (isolation #116) » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:10 am

And Pooky and Quag, where is MY answers?

Atticus · Post Post #879 (isolation #117) » Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:11 pm

Atticus wrote:<snip>

In my eyes, you're scum for attacking me with no difference in reasoning to Fishbulb, who was scum, when I know I'm not scum.

In Dirge and Quag's eyes, I'm assuming they think you're scum for using the same technique and lying about certain things.

What IS this technique THEY are talking about? What IS the technique YOU are talking about? And what is the technique I am talking about? Let's hope that we can ALL agree on what this technique is, and resolve this conflict.

MY idea of what this technique is, the one that you have used on me and Fishbulb, (admitted by you, testified by others) is taking exacty what you said about Fishbulb (lurking, not posting any content, being the leader of points, etc., etc.,) and applying it to the person you find most scummy or oppurtunistic to lynch (based on your alignment) and dive at it with guns blazing.

Hopefully that's what we all mean.

That was actualy more of a suggestion of, "what do y'all think it is?" Than a declaration, "this is probably what we all mean"

Atticus · Post Post #880 (isolation #118) » Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:11 am

How long can we count on being back? I think Anonymitiess needs to place a deal in a relatively short amount of time.

Atticus · Post Post #884 (isolation #119) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:00 pm

You make a suggestion, Pooky.

Atticus · Post Post #887 (isolation #120) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:04 am

Completely random? Or just not helpful.

We've got what, none people playing right now?

Atticus · Post Post #889 (isolation #121) » Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:39 am

Someone freaking say something?

Atticus · Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:29 am

ERGH, is it likely that you or Pooky are never going to answer my question?

Atticus · Post Post #899 (isolation #123) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:10 am

Unfortunately, I don't have a D, so I can't even begin to Deal a lynch on someone.

Atticus · Post Post #901 (isolation #124) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:51 am

Seeing as that is so, here's a reason for olio, statusquo, or anonymities to vote pooky.

He's not trying anymore.

There, I said it. If I were Pooky I would instantly contradict that statement, and since he's smart, I know he will. But that's not important to me right now. If I were town, and I was being considered for a lynch, in desperate time, when no oen's really participating, I wold be pouring out all my suspicions and anything I could, to A) Help people trust me, and B) get peope to respond to it.

Pooky's not doing that. He's posting one-liners in response to every other post directed at him, and he's sitting back, using the excuse of "cuz rushing a lynch when ur not sure if every1 is around is totally awesome. *eyeroll*" to simply sit back and do nothing at all. It's sickening! It's unPookylike! It's something ONLY SCUM WOULD DO.

I'm sure there are better reasons to apply pressure to Pooky, but this one sticks out to me, and I hope I can at least get a reply to it.

Atticus · Post Post #902 (isolation #125) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:52 am

Well, then that's why Anonymities should place a deal on Pooky.

Atticus · Post Post #910 (isolation #126) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:06 pm

And apparently, flipping out and saying BS is a technique you like to use repetitively also?

Honestly, insultation and the simple pointation out of facts will no sway any person with half a brain. If I can suggest a bit more eloquence? Perhaps a use of words beyond logic, BS, and technique? I'm not. But then, I'm currently running a campaign against you. Unfortunately, your campaign tostay in ofice is no more than, I did well once, can't I do well again? Sure, it works for some people, but 3 out of the what, 8 people currently playing are deadset against you.

Going on the offensive would help you alot, at least, alot more then simply throwing your tantrums.

Atticus · Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:32 am

And olio just lost us the chance of Pooky responding straightly to Dirge.

Atticus · Post Post #920 (isolation #128) » Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:20 pm

I argue that that is simply a hyperactive defensive manouevre.

Atticus · Post Post #924 (isolation #129) » Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:10 am

i actually like Dirge for the lynch today... i haven't really built a case against him yet, per se,
it just seems like he's taking advantage of PookyTheMagicalBear's outbursts & other things to manipulate the town...

Pooky is also using his outbursts to manipulate the town.

Shouldn't we at least have the same on-the-table weapons as our opponents? Of course, we can't use Pooky's scum abilities, but you think calling him out for relying on drastic measurements is scummy? If you say "Hey, I'm scum" is it bad for us to use thatt against you? Obviously that's not the same issue here, but if you threw a tantrum over 2 people voting you, can we not say that that is a bit strange and something that very few townspersons would quickly say in this situation?

Atticus · Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:08 am

Not that I'm not defending Dirge, but you'll notice that I have not been figfhting Pooky on the same wavelength as him until just recnetly. And not that it diminishes the fact that I am against Pooky or with Dirge on this...

But LB, you seem to be giving off an air of, "Well, I'm about to lynch Pooky to prove that he's a good guy" and so, if that's your true extent, I beleive it would be time for him to claim.

Atticus · Post Post #931 (isolation #131) » Sun Dec 10, 2006 2:51 am

if PookyTheMagicalBear gets lynched, and he's town, & you're Mafia, then i would think that would be gaining a significant advantage...

Either this was a completely random comment, or you felt that lynching Pooky would prove something.

Atticus · Post Post #937 (isolation #132) » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:12 am

Honestly olio, if you expect to beleive you're another person...

Whoah, Brian. Outbursts lead directly to lynching? Well, get Pooky for the same thing, k? Because Pooky tried to usehis outbursts to what, get us lynched? If he were scum and we were town wouldn't he be gaining an... advantage?

Atticus · Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:18 am

Why did Pooky stop participating?

Atticus · Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:55 pm

Does someone have a "stop" or "I'm the boss" card, so we can lynch someone? I'm currently fed up with Lying Brian's excuse to not lynch anyone.

Attack LyingBrian with a freshly sharpened pencil!

Atticus · Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:57 pm

olio wrote:
Atticus wrote:And olio just lost us the chance of Pooky responding straightly to Dirge.
...

1. It's not what I'm talking about here. You say Pooky lied about there being pressure from MeMe against him, I say MeMe pressured Pooky, based on her votes.
2. No, I don't think it's strong and I've never said it was a strong case. Where did you get that idea? You say it's a weak case and I think you're wrong. It's not black and white like you're trying to exaggarate it into.
3. Why are you fishing for a cop?

And sorry olio.

If you really expect me to beleive that Pooky was typing on your computer giving you those answers, then, well, that's an absurd idea.

Atticus · Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:59 am

I'm happy to start voting LB after he posts more later.

Atticus · Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:52 am

Now honestly, that changes nothing.

If you were town, you would probably still feel he was scummy. If you were a pro-town role with investigations that he was scum, you'd obviously think he's scum. If you're scum, you'd probably still hold onto that not to look stupid.

Atticus · Post Post #963 (isolation #138) » Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:17 am

TSQ, I guess you can get more points than me for... obvious reasons...

Atticus · Post Post #966 (isolation #139) » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:58 pm

It's hard to get to the top... It's harder to stay there.

Alright TSQ. I'll give you 6 and I'll take 4, deal?

Atticus · Post Post #970 (isolation #140) » Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:09 am

Wait a minute, MBL isn't even paired with Quag.

What the crap?

Atticus · Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:28 am

D'oh! I get it! And I'll do that deal, olio.

Atticus · Post Post #974 (isolation #142) » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:42 pm

Actually, sorry TSQ, I sent it in where I get 9 points and you get 1.

Atticus · Post Post #978 (isolation #143) » Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:29 am

Ah, TSQ! I thought you weren't around.

Atticus · Post Post #982 (isolation #144) » Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:04 am

A Lyncher only wins if whoever he is assigned is lynched. Not Nightkilled, lynched. I'm not sure of any further detail, but I imagine A SERIAL lyncher might get a new person everyday maybe? Maybe he has to get at least 2, 3 of his assignments lynched to win?

Atticus · Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:32 pm

What the hell?

I wanted to lynch since he voted me. Once I became boss, I wanted to make sure he could at least claim, that he wasn't a power role, before I lent the dealing hand of death. (something you didn't let him do.)

So unless you have some bogus definition of wishywashyness to give me, that's well, that's just you being stupid.

Atticus · Post Post #992 (isolation #146) » Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:50 am

Is that just a random FoS at me? Or was that supposed to be on LB...?

Atticus · Post Post #994 (isolation #147) » Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:53 pm

Atticus wrote:What the hell?

I wanted to lynch --
HIM
-- since he voted me.

There, sorry for any weird wording.

Atticus · Post Post #995 (isolation #148) » Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:14 pm

[singsong]

Almost 48 hours, and I'm waiting on two people's answers and blaming New Year's I guess.

Atticus · Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:39 am

Quag, if you noticed, my first response to Pooky's case against me was to give reasons for why I was not scum, to give reasons as to what Pooky could be thinking.

You actually complimented me on it.

"NICE ONE, Atticus, now we can finally kill Pooky!"

Then he stopped trying to get me, and I stopped concentrating on him until he flipped out. Then I voted him and kept it on him for the rest of the day. There was never any deflecting it onto anyone else in

that

situation.

Atticus · Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:21 pm

I just thought I'd point this out...

LyingBrian on Dec 29, 2006 wrote:seriously guys, we need to pick up discussion... right now, i find Atticus suspicious b/c of his wishy-washiness yesterday... first i was suspicious for not lynching PookyTheMagicalBear, then i was suspicious for wanting to lynch him...

Oh, the hypocrasy, count with me... 6 days!

Atticus · Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:56 pm

That helps your case, how?

Atticus · Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 am

I'm going slow too, but not like 5 minutes. Just like, 6 times as long as usual.

Is that the reason for which we haven't seen you for 8 days?

Atticus · Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:12 am

Trying to shorten the day but look like you asked for an extension, MBL? Go use a PM.

Atticus · Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:37 pm

Sorry, I already asked for an extension.

I was saying that you need to by using a PM, the way mith specified.

You jsut asking for one in thread seems to be in hope of making yourself look like you're trying to extend the day, but hoping it won't because he specified to use a PM. That's all.

I'm not scum. I'm a Point Whore. The person that had to get more points than me for me to get an investigation, was Thesp.

Seems too perfect? It does, the whole game, I had more points than Thesp, so I never got an investigation. So it's a perfect claim for scum, I don't have to tell you what I got for an investigation. Because I didn't get one.

I can't prove I'm not scum. A vanilla townie can't prove they're not scum, because that's what I am now.

GO REQUEST AN EXTENSION

BY PM

! Everybody! Quickly!

Atticus · Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:40 pm

And LyingBrian, you did rush to kill Pooky. AFTER you became boss, Pooky never got to post, and few people, if anyone?, posted their thoughts on who you should lynch.

Atticus · Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:10 am

Either MBL is extremely paranoid, is scum who thinks he's slipped up, or is a townie who thinks he's in danger for some hallucinogen-inspired reason.

And, MrBuddLee, that is why I told you. Because Either you didn't know how to put in a request, or you were just doing it to be a smart scum.

Atticus · Thu Jan 18, 2007 7:20 am

Me and Dirge cannot spend time reading and posting in this game due to the ice storm. We don't really have power, this is just the use of a library computer.

Atticus · Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:10 am

Now we have power, reread and thoughts coming after school.

Atticus · Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:31 pm

Now why the heffles is LB voting me again? I don't beleive he told me yesterday, and now this vote comes outta da blue.

I would post some more content right now, but after a big reread post for Big Lebowski, I'm too ired to look back and observe here. Maybe later tonight.

Atticus · Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:50 am

Okay, I'll be back later, but

LB, why is you voting me?

Atticus · Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:37 am

The unfortunate thing for the Betrayal at House on the Hill game is that I assume the item you have to attack with is something from MeMeMeet, and almost half the people in the game didn't go.

MOD: Are there any point bonuses for attacking the Traitor with the right item?

Attack LyingBrian with MeMeMeet

Currently, after rereading Lb's posts today, I feel that he is not scum. Why? Because he's being a reckless idiot. I'm thinking quagmire's scum.
Something is just not striking me as scummy about LB or Dirge, of course, Dirge has posted only a few times today, so recent information is hard to find.

So why Quag? An age-old question.

quag wrote:I hate to say it, MBL, but I am town. From this point on, I'll be goin gon vibes from other people -- which just happens to be olio at #1. Does anyone else think at this point that we should mass claim?

This gives me a scum vibe most of all. He hates to say that he's town, that's not particularly scummy, it's jsut that he's never particularly claimed this whole game, and now he just says, he is town. I guess there is no reason to actually claim, yes, but why now, why 'I am town"?

Most of his whole game has been either attacking Pooky, or oneliners.

This is what I have right now,

Vote: Quagmire.

Atticus · Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:48 am

Ugh, confused, dazed, funned out. That was fun, I just wish that the crashes hadn't ruined the spectacular game and caused so many people to be not from MeMeMeet. Shame. But It was enjoyable to play in, good job mith!