MeMeMeet Mafia (Game Over!)

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

stop: dirge's stop card

i love how Dirge/Atticus/Quag continue to try to get me lynched without the rest of the town's approval and call it " moving the game along"

[Atticus]

Seeing as that is so, here's a reason for olio, statusquo, or anonymities to vote pooky.

He's not trying anymore.

There, I said it. If I were Pooky I would instantly contradict that statement, and since he's smart, I know he will. But that's not important to me right now. If I were town, and I was being considered for a lynch, in desperate time, when no oen's really participating, I wold be pouring out all my suspicions and anything I could, to A) Help people trust me, and B) get peope to respond to it.

Pooky's not doing that. He's posting one-liners in response to every other post directed at him, and he's sitting back, using the excuse of "cuz rushing a lynch when ur not sure if every1 is around is totally awesome. *eyeroll*" to simply sit back and do nothing at all. It's sickening! It's unPookylike! It's something ONLY SCUM WOULD DO.

I'm sure there are better reasons to apply pressure to Pooky, but this one sticks out to me, and I hope I can at least get a reply to it.

[Atticus]

Well, then that's why Anonymities should place a deal on Pooky.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Name one piece of actual logic you guys have used to attack me that I have not addressed.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

or have not addressed adequately in your opinion

[Thestatusquo]

I also know that pooky is sick, and has been sick for a long time.

[Quagmire]

or have not addressed adequately in your opinion

all of them. all you do is insult us instead of defending yourself.

[Anonymities]

I fail to see why waiting for a few more town to post is putting a damper on the game. If we had a vote with all the active players now, we would be missing a significant portion of input from the rest of the town. So, I am imposing a sudo-deadline.

If players such as Ibby, MBL and Fritz don't voice some decent opinions soon, I will make a deal by the end of this week (By the end of Saturday mtn time).

Barring of course some unforeseen circumstances like my computer getting hit by a train or a rabid chicken eating it.

[Thestatusquo]

Ibby is taking care of her mom, hence not on the site.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Now, pooky, since you're complaining about the rest of the town not reading whatever points you have against Atticus: Because you don't! You're just pursuing the same technique to try and lynch everyone! Plus, since you're treating me and Drige as having nothing against you, why have you not read my posts in the past! I've said this exact same thing at least two times, and each time, you've ignored it and/or failed to read what I've had to say. Whatever condescending attitude you have in this game needs to drop before I start arguing for the town to lynch you just out of spite AND because you're "a wolf in bear clothing" (as Dirge so eloquently put it) instead of trying to lynch you because of the latter.

Also, ibby: The contributions I've put up over the last couple of weeks have really trumped any of yours this game. I'm not really yelling at you because of your contributions, though - there are people that I could try and destroy because of lurking and lackadasicalness with a greater success rate than you - I'm yelling at you because of your hypocricy in dealing with me (and blindly following pooky).

Whew. I think I've argued myself to re-vote pooky. unvote ibby, vote pooky.

Here was my response addressing your "logic",

Maybe you and I are not reading the same !@#$ing game, but that "same technique" CAUGHT SCUM!!!!!(THATS HOW YOU WIN THE GAME BTW, CATCHING SCUMBAGS AND LYNCHING THEM) SO WHEN U !@#$ING ACCUSE ME OF USING THE SAME !@#$ING TECHNIQUE I USED YESTERDAY!!

THEN I WILL ANSWER YOU!!

HELL YES!! I DO DAMN WELL USE THE SAME TECHNIQUE THAT HAS WORKED IN THE PAST IN CATCHING SCUM

Since i've addressed your accusation of me using the same technique, your post above about me not addressing your logic is incorrect and BS.

[Atticus]

And apparently, flipping out and saying BS is a technique you like to use repetitively also?

Honestly, insultation and the simple pointation out of facts will no sway any person with half a brain. If I can suggest a bit more eloquence? Perhaps a use of words beyond logic, BS, and technique? I'm not. But then, I'm currently running a campaign against you. Unfortunately, your campaign tostay in ofice is no more than, I did well once, can't I do well again? Sure, it works for some people, but 3 out of the what, 8 people currently playing are deadset against you.

Going on the offensive would help you alot, at least, alot more then simply throwing your tantrums.

[mith]

Vote Count:

Current Boss - Anonymities

PookyTheMagicalBear: CGLSW (Atticus, Dirge, Quagmire)
Quagmire: CGSW (Fritzler, ibaesha, MrBuddyLee)
Atticus: LSW (PookyTheMagicalBear)

Current Character Influence and Cards Remaining:

Anonymities (CDGLS)
Atticus (CW, 2)
Dirge (GL, 2)
Fritzler (CS, 4)
ibaesha (W, 4)
MrBuddyLee (G, 5)
olio (DL, 4)
PookyTheMagicalBear (LSW, 1)
Quagmire (GS, 4)
Thestatusquo (D, 5)

Mod Note:

I'll look into replacing ibby.

[Dirge]

Name one piece of actual logic you guys have used to attack me that I have not addressed...or have not addressed adequately in your opinion

1. MeMe was not responsible for your close call. You lied about it.
2. Your reasoning for lynching FB was weak, yet you expect it to fly again.
3. You use your fingering of FB as proof that you're town.

That's just off the top of my head.

[olio]

1. MeMe was not responsible for your close call. You lied about it.
2. Your reasoning for lynching FB was weak, yet you expect it to fly again.
3. You use your fingering of FB as proof that you're town.

None of those hold water, like I've said before.

1. You blatantly exaggerate Pooky's words to lie. In my opinion there was a pressure from MeMe towards Pooky.
2. In my opinion Pooky's case against Fishbulb wasn't weak.
3. You're ready to lynch somebody who has netted us one scum based on your non-existant, weak case.

unvote
vote: Dirge

[mith]

Vote Count:

Current Boss - Anonymities

PookyTheMagicalBear: CGLSW (Atticus, Dirge, Quagmire)
Quagmire: CGSW (Fritzler, LyingBrian, MrBuddyLee)
Atticus: LSW (PookyTheMagicalBear)

Dirge: DL (olio)

Current Character Influence and Cards Remaining:

Anonymities (CDGLS)
Atticus (CW, 2)
Dirge (GL, 2)
Fritzler (CS, 4)
LyingBrian (W, 4)
MrBuddyLee (G, 5)
olio (DL, 4)
PookyTheMagicalBear (LSW, 1)
Quagmire (GS, 4)
Thestatusquo (D, 5)

Mod Note:

LyingBrian replaces ibaesha.

[Anonymities]

Mod, out of curiosity - wouldn't it be possible for me to lynch anyone with a W vote against them?


Also, I am still planning on the end of week deadline.

[mith]

Sorry, you're right. I forgot to check after you grabbed the C. Fixing it now.

[Atticus]

And olio just lost us the chance of Pooky responding straightly to Dirge.

[LyingBrian]

i haven't received my role PM or anything, but i'm here... still trying to sort through everything, though, especially since my database is wanting to be finnicky... hopefully have an update within 24 hours...

[Quagmire]

Now, pooky, since you're complaining about the rest of the town not reading whatever points you have against Atticus: Because you don't! You're just pursuing the same technique to try and lynch everyone! Plus, since you're treating me and Drige as having nothing against you, why have you not read my posts in the past! I've said this exact same thing at least two times, and each time, you've ignored it and/or failed to read what I've had to say. Whatever condescending attitude you have in this game needs to drop before I start arguing for the town to lynch you just out of spite AND because you're "a wolf in bear clothing" (as Dirge so eloquently put it) instead of trying to lynch you because of the latter.

Also, ibby: The contributions I've put up over the last couple of weeks have really trumped any of yours this game. I'm not really yelling at you because of your contributions, though - there are people that I could try and destroy because of lurking and lackadasicalness with a greater success rate than you - I'm yelling at you because of your hypocricy in dealing with me (and blindly following pooky).

Whew. I think I've argued myself to re-vote pooky. unvote ibby, vote pooky.

Here was my response addressing your "logic",

Maybe you and I are not reading the same !@#$ing game, but that "same technique" CAUGHT SCUM!!!!!(THATS HOW YOU WIN THE GAME BTW, CATCHING SCUMBAGS AND LYNCHING THEM) SO WHEN U !@#$ING ACCUSE ME OF USING THE SAME !@#$ING TECHNIQUE I USED YESTERDAY!!

THEN I WILL ANSWER YOU!!

HELL YES!! I DO DAMN WELL USE THE SAME TECHNIQUE THAT HAS WORKED IN THE PAST IN CATCHING SCUM

Since i've addressed your accusation of me using the same technique, your post above about me not addressing your logic is incorrect and BS.

umm, that was an "attack", not a "defense". in addition, that did nothing more than strengthen my argument against you. i'm about 98% sure that i already told you that.

[Atticus]

I argue that that is simply a hyperactive defensive manouevre.

[LyingBrian]

ok i've reread the last day, and i got my database working (to some extent), so i'm pretty much caught up except i'm still waiting on at least 2 PMs (role & "Boss" cards)

i actually like Dirge for the lynch today... i haven't really built a case against him yet, per se, it just seems like he's taking advantage of PookyTheMagicalBear's outbursts & other things to manipulate the town...

unvote: Quagmire

vote: Dirge

[Dirge]

i actually like Dirge for the lynch today... i haven't really built a case against him yet, per se, it just seems like he's taking advantage of PookyTheMagicalBear's outbursts & other things to manipulate the town...

Can you point to something that I'm doing different now that I wasn't doing before Pooky blew up? Wouldn't taking "advantage" of something mean that I have gained an "advantage"? I think all I have done was reiterate the same thing over and over. Nothing has changed.

1. You blatantly exaggerate Pooky's words to lie. In my opinion there was a pressure from MeMe towards Pooky.
2. In my opinion Pooky's case against Fishbulb wasn't weak.
3. You're ready to lynch somebody who has netted us one scum based on your non-existant, weak case.

Let me ask you a couple of related questions to your defense of Pooky...
1. You think that a player of Pooky's caliber would see a few people jumping on to vote him as inspired

only

by MeMe's half hearted attack and not an attempt to avoid a no-lynch with deadline approaching?
2. Do you think that a case that applies to more than half of the players in the game is strong?
3. Do you think that FB being scum means that Pooky is town?

[Dirge]

BTW Quag, love the new sig.

[Atticus]

i actually like Dirge for the lynch today... i haven't really built a case against him yet, per se,

it just seems like he's taking advantage of PookyTheMagicalBear's outbursts & other things to manipulate the town...

Pooky is also using his outbursts to manipulate the town.

Shouldn't we at least have the same on-the-table weapons as our opponents? Of course, we can't use Pooky's scum abilities, but you think calling him out for relying on drastic measurements is scummy? If you say "Hey, I'm scum" is it bad for us to use thatt against you? Obviously that's not the same issue here, but if you threw a tantrum over 2 people voting you, can we not say that that is a bit strange and something that very few townspersons would quickly say in this situation?