You were the last one to confirm.
Good Luck to all.
ok, my vote is serious now.
You're the most probing of the lot of us, Corp, however you seem to end all your statements with another question, rather than an opinion for yourself.The Corporation wrote:I can only come up with two reasons for so much aggression. One, it seems to be a pretty popular strategy to get through the first day. Or two, it comes from the frustration that the Irish haven't beaten the All Blacks in 100+ years of competition. I'll take a little of each...PhilyEc wrote:Are you dumb or something? Theres no contrast here at all, someone not putting down a random votedoesnt equal lurking. Who the hell encourages lurking to begin with? sorry mate but fail. I was bumpbumpbump-ing because I'm seeing too many of the same people talking and didnt want this to develop into a game where players become spectators.
Sorry for being rude but just because qwints said not taking part in the RVS makes someone a lurker doesnt mean its true. falkomagno can still talk and participate, building cases and asking questions, there just won't be any meaningless votes from him.
Post1= Phily defending someone who is being persecuted for not doing a random vote.
Post2= Phily asking more people to participate.
You'll never see me "defend lurking and lack of activity at this point in the game" OR BEG for activity. IGMEOY Mr. Exaggeration.
Anyway... I'm confused when you say you are:
PhilyEc wrote:Phily defending someone who is being persecuted for not doing a random vote.
when in post 11HE MADE SUCH A VOTEwith:
On me of all people! The nerve. Therefore I took his post of...falkomagno wrote:OMGUS....but I have tovote The Corporation....it's not FalkoMANGO...it's Falkomagno...from magnus...
to mean that he had cast his "random" vote, and was only going to jump back into discussion when he felt the "serious" voting would start. That post could perhaps be a genuine request from a newbie player - but if you know enough to cast a random vote unprompted and know the acronyms OMGUS & RVS you are hardlyfalkomagno wrote:yeah....just advice me when the RVS stops, and the serious voting start...thattype of newbie.
Falkomango can you please weigh in and actually clarify what he meant in that message as clearly one or both of us is a little confused...Regardless it does appear you have been suspiciously defensive of him. Have you played with him the past or something? I highly doubt you are mafia together as going this hard together on qwints would be so obvious. On the contrary I'd like to tighten the screw just a little more on qwints - he layed a "serious" vote on falkomagno in post 21 but has done sweet FA to spell it out!
However, this just seems to be just a line to try and convince us of Innocence.I'm town who doesnt want to let a mislynch happen.
I don't know how many classes you are taking, or at what level, but even during finals week while I was doing my undergrad I had a couple hours of free time to waste on the internet.
Metabots? Lol.Also, can someone explain to me what meta means?
I would say thats legit.Sorry, but my lack of chance to be seriously active is real. I have 0% chance of having access to a computer at school, I'm too busy in the morning to get on, and my older brother plays his stupid MMORPG way too much (from about the time he gets home to (today) 5:30 PM. I'll show you the game plus his account, if you want.) This is probably going to be my last game until school comes or until my bro becomes less obsessed Sad And interestingly enough, I don't have legit finals. I have something that resembles a yearly test, but it doesn't affect my grades, and it's insultingly easy (state test for middle school)
Dude, I suck at quotes today...GadgetArcrep wrote:Maybe he hasnt noticed it yet, But then again, when its page five, i'm sure you would of by now.Shotty wrote: I don't think he said anything about RL stuff like Toledo did, just said he would post whenever RVS was over, which it clearly is.
He could be scum or flaking.
Everyone has a right to be suspicious of someone for whatever reason, so I dont really mind.Gadget and Qwints, not so much.
I wouldnt say 10 could be benchmark, but we need a real kicker before something causes a good enough Majority vote.Corp pretty much wrote: We shouldnt really push for lynch untill at least Page 10
I'm gonna have to say that is a feat.PhilyEc wrote:I'd gotten mashed in town, so drunk I got lost and walked home. Yes walked. So I sobered up pretty well doing that. That said I was really in need of some distraction so I thought I'd have some fun and see if I could still play while drunk. (selfish ano)GadgetArcrep wrote:Exactly how drunk were you that night Phily, just asking?
Because someone who was drunk would probably refrain from posting anyways, unless it was one drink.
That or make some mistakes while typing.
And I dont even need to look at the keyboard to type, I hit backspace and keep going in the rhythem so I doubt I'd ever make a big bunch of typos, drunk of not.
I guess if I was going to state my drunk level at the time, it was somewhere between -wobbling legs- & -dizzy head-
To me, that would be considered baiting someone, You're baiting me to react in a way that you can convince Phily that I am scum, and from the bat you have been considering me the main suspect and pushing for a lynch.Cyren wrote: Also Philly please don't respond to any of this at least not till after Gadget responds if you want. Its not questioning you but Gadget's thought process.
Which is exactly what you did then to see wether or not i was paying attention, because ignoring posts, in your opinion, is one of my attributes.I would suggest always reading everything even when it isn't addressed to you.
Again, I still consider Phily as one of my suspects, just not my main suspect at the moment. To be honest, You are starting to be one of my suspects, this is not OMGUSing, but my suspicions are based on your persistance to put me away, with pretty much most if not all your your game relevant posts are a direct attack to me, or includes one, to try and steer conversation towards being about me.That is how the game works, if we backed off of everyone who simply said, "I'm town don't lynch me" we'd never finish a game. What exactly makes you think he is a townie instead of scum?
I cant meta on that fact, and even if I could I wouldnt. But I would like to point out that it is my nature when writing anything, my mother knows it, my english teacher has lectured me on it (but more of said lecture is sexual innuendo and tangental to the actual topic, trust me, he says irrelevant stuff more often than relevant stuff). etc etc.You're being highly contradicting and confusing.
I have a feeling PR's tonight will have their work cut out for them, if Town/kill lists really are prominent.I would recommend against an accumulation of "pro-town" lists as they often turn into "to-kill" lists for the mafia.
Claim time.corp wrote:I'm going to assume we are playing the third set up because seriously if we have a doctor why didn't they save Cyren. Such an obvious target for scum?!
If we have a doctor its probably worth claiming so the odds of knocking out a townsfolk are diminished.
I'm slightly torn at this, We have pretty much a situation that could allow scum to win if we aim wrong.For me the smart money on a scum partner is qwints.