Newbie 785 - Game Over

[GadgetArcrep]

I'm Going to Retract My Vote.

Unvote

Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,

I vote qwints

He flip flopped too quickly by saying, and I quote.

ok, my vote is serious now.

He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.

[Shotty to the Body]

Could be, I'm keeping my vote where it is until Toledo88 posts.

[Vel-Rahn Koon]

Official Vote Count

Giskard - 1 (PhilyEc)
Toledo88 - 1 (Shotty to the Body)
falkomagno - 1 (qwints)

The Corporation - 2 (Toledo88, falkomagno)

Cornellius Alfredo - 1 (The Corporation)
qwints - 1 (GadgetArcrep)

Not Voting - 2 (Cornellius Alfredo, Giskard)

5 to Lynch.

Deadline

is the end of Saturday, May 30th (Eastern, GMT - 4).

[PhilyEc]

I'm Going to Retract My Vote.

Unvote

Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,

I vote qwints

He flip flopped too quickly by saying, and I quote.

ok, my vote is serious now.

He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.

Qwints is number one on my list at the moment, hes voting for poor reason so far.

Vote Qwints

Players dont avoid RVS cause they dont want to reveal scummy intentions, they avoid RVS cause though its dumb, they also find it irritating.

[Toledo25]

Could be, I'm keeping my vote where it is until Toledo88 posts.

I hear, and I obey =P


I have a question for qwints:

unvote, vote falkomango
For making an acknowledged OMGUS vote.

Why would falkoscum be more likely to OMGUS vote than falkotown?

Mod, I believe on the last vote count, you didn't note that Gadget was voting for qwints. Currently, it says he's not voting.

Unless I managed to somehow misinterpret the vote count -.-

I also forgot to do this before: Welcome to the game everyone

Thanks, fixed!

[Giskard]

vote: Toledo88

for the following reason:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol

[Toledo25]

vote: Toledo88

for the following reason:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol

I'll take that as a random vote... I think.

[Giskard]

vote: Toledo88

for the following reason:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol

I'll take that as a random vote... I think.

The 88 just made you name jump out at me.

[PhilyEc]

vote: Toledo88

for the following reason:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol

...should've said its cas his name sounds like a gas station...88? Really? XD

[Toledo25]

It was originally going to be 25, but 88 is easier to type. Whatever.

[PhilyEc]

It was originally going to be 25, but 88 is easier to type. Whatever.

OH no, 88 is fine. Voting for someone for that number is WEIRD. Don't fret x]

Also [bumpbumpbump] more activity plz, I wanna find scum.

[Shotty to the Body]

If Giskard is voting for him unless I miss my guess he's at L-1 for no reason, some of you should unvote. I don't think there's anywhere near enough evidence to put anyone at L-1 at this point. =\ If we lynch now we'll have learned almost nothing from D1.

[falkomagno]

ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...

unvote, Fos qwints

[Shotty to the Body]

EBWOP
Nvm, I miscounted. Either way let's not bandwagon anyone just yet.

[PhilyEc]

ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...

unvote, Fos qwints

You call and FoS pressure? ._.

[Shotty to the Body]

Could be, I'm keeping my vote where it is until Toledo88 posts.

I hear, and I obey =P


I have a question for qwints:

unvote, vote falkomango
For making an acknowledged OMGUS vote.

Why would falkoscum be more likely to OMGUS vote than falkotown?

Mod, I believe on the last vote count, you didn't note that Gadget was voting for qwints. Currently, it says he's not voting.

Unless I managed to somehow misinterpret the vote count -.-

I also forgot to do this before: Welcome to the game everyone

unvote

=P

[PhilyEc]

ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...

unvote, Fos qwints

You call and FoS pressure? ._.

an FoS* =_=

[Giskard]

It was originally going to be 25, but 88 is easier to type. Whatever.

OH no, 88 is fine. Voting for someone for that number is WEIRD. Don't fret x]

Also [bumpbumpbump] more activity plz, I wanna find scum.

I wasn't voting for him BECAUSE of the the number, I was voting for him because that number made is name jump out at me.

[PhilyEc]

<__< its a joke vote, the reason doesnt matter..

[Giskard]

<__< its a joke vote, the reason doesnt matter..

Oh, sorry. This is my first time playing mafia over the internet and I am trying my best to adjust to not being able to see the other people I am playing with or hear their tone of voice.

[qwints]

ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...

unvote, Fos qwints

You can't create pressure by saying "let's pressure him." You create pressure through pointed questions and votes. The fact that you say "there is not reals reasons to put in danger anybody" makes this post basically white noise.

I'm Going to Retract My Vote.

Unvote

Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,

I vote qwints

He flip flopped too quickly by saying, and I quote.

ok, my vote is serious now.

He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.

You're clearly misrepresenting me. My first vote choice switch was a joking response to falkomango. I made it clear (upon Phily_EC's) request that I was not being seroius. I stated that it

was

a real vote only after falkomango made a post saying implying he wasn't going to participate until after the random voting phase was over. Wait and see approaches are scummy. I've got no problem with criticisms of RVS, but you don't get to say "I'm going to sit out of the game until we find actual suspects." That's basically announcing your intention to actively lurk and it made me say that my vote was now serious.


*IC Hat on*
Everyone make sure to "unvote" before you place your next vote. Some mods will not count your new vote until you cancel your old one.

Mod note:

Read the rules

for the specific mod. I don't require an unvote first, but it's a good habit

[PhilyEc]

but you don't get to say "I'm going to sit out of the game until we find actual suspects." That's basically announcing your intention to actively lurk and it made me say that my vote was now serious

He just said he wasn't going to make a random vote. He can still participate if he finds something scummy. Its up to town to agree or disagree so I dont see where you're going with this one.

[qwints]

yeah....just advice me when the RVS stops, and the serious voting start...

This is not simply saying he's not going to voe. This is him saying he's not going to participate until "the serious voting start."

Phily_EC, why are you defending him so fiercely so early?

[PhilyEc]

yeah....just advice me when the RVS stops, and the serious voting start...

This is not simply saying he's not going to voe. This is him saying he's not going to participate until "the serious voting start."

Phily_EC, why are you defending him so fiercely so early?

Because the action doesnt deserve a vote, let alone a lynch. You ain't being reasonable here and you could possibly be scum. I am rather contradicting someone I think to be scum rather than randomly defending a player (since thats no help towards finding scum)

[qwints]

1. It's page two, there's no particular need to be reasonable.
2. I wasn't pushing for a lynch.
3. It did deserve a vote because active lurking is to be discouraged.
4. Defending players (as opposed to attacking players for dumb votes) is scummy. You tried to explain falkomango's actions in 46. Let him speak for himself.