You built your case against me in post 187. Well, in fact was a kind of PBPA with your own opinion about my activity. I respond you properly in post 209 and I did point by point. You didn't counter-argument my answers given in post 209. You just skimmed, in post 232, the last part of my post, and as some kind of conclusion of your case, you say again why"my vote for qwints was terrible", that, correct me if I'm wrong, is the axis of you accusation against me
I answered you again, but, the fact that in post 232 you just counter-argument my last part of the post, implies that the rest of my answer post is not wrong or debatible for you, thus, was logical responses. If not, and as I said before, I encourage you to elaborate your case against me, since, by now I just see that in your opinion I shouldn't did vote for qwints and that makes me scum. I don't see anything else.
And well, it's true that qwints clarify himself about his "I'm serious" joke. In fact, he unvote me later. I've been keep my vote against qwets because he stop his activity for a while, so he gave me no reasons to unvote him, but right now I don't think that he is the scummest person. I was critical about him, and with people who says that he was townish, because he suddenly dissapear. but lately, he has contributed, and there is no reasosn to keep my vote on qwert.
I know, because I see you biased against me, that, no matter if I vote, or vote for anyone else, it's probable that my behaviour is scum to you. That's fine, I just want to motivate you again to elaborate, so I can respond properly as well. If I'm wrong, you have to prove it.
@ Cyren. I agree with you about get involve about zito/shotty/me/gadget cases. But right now, and due those huge walls of text from side and side, whatever I would say would be a too little. But, what the hell.
Zito: I see tha he's elaborating his arguments, but I noticed some emotional blackmail, putting people in a position -if you aren't with me, you are against me-. I saw that reaction from zito with qwints, corps and myself
Shotty: It's true that he has just post with real content lately, when he felt the pressure from zito, and the lynch becoming. this can be understandable, but, maybe it's just too late
Corp:Hard to see corp. But I'm not want to add in that positive BW about him agreeing that is townish. No way
To be honest, about you and gadjet, I will have to read both of you isolate, so, later I can post my opinion about it
Qwerts,: As pointed some valid points lately. I'm about neutral on him right now[/b]