w00t.
Princess Bride Mafia - Game Over
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
It's incredibly dumb to show your hand on your first post, on the first post. As a cop, you want to throw suspicion off yourself, so you don't reveal your role until the second or third day (unless you have to). This is common strategy.jadesmar wrote:DP: If you are a cop that found a guilty party, why did you start yesterday with a random vote? I don't get it.-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
vote: mlaker
This day has gone far enough. I'm willing to sacrifice a townie kill to gain more information, both through mlaker's role (finding DP's sanity), the kills that happen through the night (which, believe it or not, help the town in looking at motives for the scum), and, maybe most importantly, the results of other cops who most likely exist. Yet another piece of the puzzle put together.-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
If you don't mind, let me address some of the issues with a clear mind, as I'm sure Dourgrim's is clogged with frustration now (as is yours
Wrong. A gut feeling is as good as any to FOS someone, in fact, it's what they are there for. In most people's opinions, the only time you need to "justify" yourself is a vote. For a precedent, look atSomeone wrote:
This is because you haven't gave any reason to justify your FOS.Dourgrim wrote:And you know what the most fun thing about all of this is? I wanted to hear more from you because you had (and still have) failed to allay my suspicions, and the only thing you do is rant and rave about my FoS.anymafia game on this site. There is almost always an FOS because of a "gut feeling."
Let me restate what Dourgrim said here. He believes you to be suspicious because of issues where you've contradicted yourself and appeared to act shifty. For these specific issues (not all of which I see), ask Dourgrim. As to what Granpa's "sainity" has to do with you, he's referring to the fact that almost all discussion has revolved around him and people he's accused, leaving people not connected with that issue, namely, you, free from discussion. He believes that you are keeping the people distracted by bringing that issue up over and over again.Someone wrote:Dourgrim wrote:That'd be almost funny if it weren't such an obvious ploy to avoid attention. The reasons to be suspicious of you are well documented throughout the thread, and the only thing preventing people from voting for you and lynching you because of those reasons is the fact that no one really trusts DP's "Grandpa" claim or his sanity. I really don't care how often you post... I care what you have to say in those posts. So far all I see is smoke and mirrors.
WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT I AM GUILTY???
HOW DOES GRANDPA"S SAINITY HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME???
Rite's take on the whole matter: Dourgrim is paranoid, but he may or may not be on to something. Someone is, quite frankly, an inexperienced player, and I don't respect the way he plays the game. That is no indication, though, of his guilt or innocence, so I'll refrain from a vote at this time.
Rite
P.S.-- It's very impolite to scream on the internet (speak in all capital letters). Combined with typos, it doesn't give us a very good impression of you.
~edited by MeMe to fix tag~-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
I really hate to keep chiming in like this, but you people don't get it. Mlaker, scroll up. See how Dourgrim has helpfullymlaker wrote:I still say that was a little suspicious since I had voted the day before and when I saw your post it was my first log in of the day.underlinedthat he did not accuse anyone of lurking, including you. Just asking somebody to post is not an accusation of them not posting.-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
Wow, you haven't said anything inventive with this post, you are just repeating what several other people have said. I've yet to see you think for yourself this game, mlaker, and the fact that you managed to use the phrasemlaker wrote:I'm saying that you came through and voted for Someone then me very quickly it was as you said trying to get suspicion off yourself.Very wishy washy.
mlaker
makes me respect you about as much as Someone in this game. I'm an English nazi, sue me. However, I'm not as convinced of Someone's scumminess as I am growing to be of you.mlaker wrote:blow smoke and mirrors
Just reiterating myvote: mlaker-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
Coming out with innocents would necissitate a role claim. In a themed game like this, there are only a limited number of players who could be conceivably a cop... granted, we've already had our issues with the Priest and Old Booer, but I think it's going to get increasingly harder and harder to role-claim.
Not sure if I want it down now, but today or tomorrow will probably be time for forking our results over.-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
Alright, time for the truth to come out.
I'm Vizzini.
But don't lynch me! I'm a cop. Each night I use my genius logic/investigative abilities to investigate one person, and get the result of good or evil. Also, being Vizzini, and a braggart, I can't resist sharing it with other people. This is where many of you guys have been getting information from-- me. As for the fact that Vizzini was evil in the movie-- it was pointed out to me that Vizzini is a geniusfor hire... and our mod decided to hire me out to the town.
One small issue-- I did get all innocents... but I can't imagine Vizzini being naive. ::shrug::
List of investigations/who they were sent to:
Night One: Investigated DP (innocent), sent results to Dourgrim, mathcam, or mole
Night Two: Investigated CRiX(innocent), sent results to DP, Sugar, or Werebear
Night Three: Investigated jadesmar (innocent), sent results to DP, CRiX, and Dourgrim
Night Four: Investigated mathcam (innocent), sent results to DP, CRiX, and jadesmar.
Those who received my results should find that the nights synch up, proving my role claim.
It is of course worth noting that CRiX is now Fishbulb.
Whoo-hoo... I've been holding this in for a while with all this Vizzini bashing
Inconceivable!
Rite-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
I have no idea where Dourgrim's information about CRiX came from... as I've already noted, the information only goes to one of the three people I choose, in this case it was Sugar.
And as for voting for me... how the heck could I get away with this if I was scum? Don't you think whoever's has "really" been giving this information out would have come out by now? And how did I know what night the information was sent out?
Oh, andFOS: Dourgrim and Fishbulb. It's possible that Dourgrim made up that he got information about CriX/Fishbulb to cover for fellow scum.-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
The investigation was that mole is good.
Although I can see why y'all are suspicous of Vizzini, I wonder why you are so eager to lynch me. What good would a scum role be that reveals the innocence or guiltiness of a person to TOWNIES. Not one of my investigations has been wrong so far. At least give me the benefit of the doubt, huh?-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
I'm not sure what you guys want me to do to clear myself. All I can think to do is ask Talitha to investigate me tonight. If she gets guilty, then goodness, I'll DEMAND my lynch. But I'm helping the town out, here.
As for why results got sent to mole, it was an honest mistake on my part. I'd thought that I had already investigated him.
Rite-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
-
-
rite Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Shameless Bandwagoner
- Posts: 464
- Joined: December 31, 2002
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.