Princess Bride Mafia - Game Over


User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #500 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2003 12:12 pm

Post by mathcam »

Well, certainly wait until the innocents are revealed by the cops who are already out. It would be a waste of a good secret if they only repeated information DP and Sugar already had.

Cam
User avatar
Sugar
Sugar
moderately caffeinated
User avatar
User avatar
Sugar
moderately caffeinated
moderately caffeinated
Posts: 229
Joined: September 15, 2002
Location: Central USA

Post Post #501 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:06 pm

Post by Sugar »

massive wrote:Sugar, you make me laugh.

Well, sometimes our sense of humor is all we have. :wink:

The bonus I got was about Crix/Fishbulb. He is good. Over to you, DP... I'm crossing my fingers, hoping yours are different.
[color=#500000] [size=75]Man! Today is so loopy! - The Tick[/size][/color]
User avatar
Fishbulb
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1322
Joined: July 15, 2003
Location: West Virginia, US

Post Post #502 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:19 pm

Post by Fishbulb »

Whee!

And I have a bonus about a
different
player. Didn't want to say anything until I saw what Sugar had. Should I reveal?
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
User avatar
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
Don't shoot the mod
Posts: 3245
Joined: April 1, 2002
Location: Kampen. Yeah.

Post Post #503 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2003 6:11 pm

Post by Dragon Phoenix »

I can clear mathcam and jadesmar.
User avatar
Dourgrim
Dourgrim
Yep. Again.
User avatar
User avatar
Dourgrim
Yep. Again.
Yep. Again.
Posts: 875
Joined: February 12, 2003
Location: Elkhorn, WI

Post Post #504 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:45 pm

Post by Dourgrim »

I still think this is a bad idea, but I'll go along with the Town's wishes.

I received "innocent" results on CRiX and jadesmar. Doesn't really help much, but it's what I got. Sorry. :?
[size=75]The point of the journey is not to arrive...[/size]
User avatar
rite
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
User avatar
User avatar
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
Shameless Bandwagoner
Posts: 464
Joined: December 31, 2002

Post Post #505 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:45 am

Post by rite »

Where are ye all getting this information from?
User avatar
Fishbulb
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1322
Joined: July 15, 2003
Location: West Virginia, US

Post Post #506 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 2:04 am

Post by Fishbulb »

Ah. Well I got mathcam is innocent, as well.
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
User avatar
MeMe
MeMe
Post or Perish
User avatar
User avatar
MeMe
Post or Perish
Post or Perish
Posts: 10710
Joined: October 6, 2002
Location: Missouri

Post Post #507 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 2:37 am

Post by MeMe »

Count:


Dourgrim
(1):
Someone

Werebear
(1):
Sugar


Not voting (11):
Dourgrim, Dragon Phoenix, Fishbulb, jadesmar, massive, mathcam, mikehart, mole, Norinel, rite, Werebear


Brutes at seven.
Remember...It's not a lie if you believe it. -- G. Costanza
User avatar
Fishbulb
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1322
Joined: July 15, 2003
Location: West Virginia, US

Post Post #508 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:03 am

Post by Fishbulb »

So, from what I gather, this is what we have left:

Werebear
rite
massive
mikehart
Norinel

Correct me if I am wrong, but those are the players who haven't been cleared yet. My idea is to have them all role claim without any of us saying who we are. Then, we should be able to pick out which ones are faked easier.

Good idea?
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #509 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:29 am

Post by mathcam »

I dont' see any immediate problems with this. It's not like we risk exposing our power roles, as all of our investigative roles have come forward. There's not much to lose, and plenty to possibly gain. I say talk, potential scum.

Cam
User avatar
massive
massive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
massive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4918
Joined: July 16, 2003
Location: The Springs, CO

Post Post #510 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by massive »

I'm Fezzik.

Who cleared Dourgrim?
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #511 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 6:04 am

Post by mathcam »

No one's clear Dourgrim, Sugar, or Dragon Phoenix (Phoniex)
per se
, but they claim to have investigative roles, so I think they're close enough to be cleared for the time-being.

Cam
User avatar
rite
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
User avatar
User avatar
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
Shameless Bandwagoner
Posts: 464
Joined: December 31, 2002

Post Post #512 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 6:55 am

Post by rite »

Alright, time for the truth to come out.

I'm Vizzini.

But don't lynch me! I'm a cop. Each night I use my genius logic/investigative abilities to investigate one person, and get the result of good or evil. Also, being Vizzini, and a braggart, I can't resist sharing it with other people. This is where many of you guys have been getting information from-- me. As for the fact that Vizzini was evil in the movie-- it was pointed out to me that Vizzini is a genius
for hire
... and our mod decided to hire me out to the town.

One small issue-- I did get all innocents... but I can't imagine Vizzini being naive. ::shrug::

List of investigations/who they were sent to:

Night One: Investigated DP (innocent), sent results to Dourgrim, mathcam, or mole

Night Two: Investigated CRiX(innocent), sent results to DP, Sugar, or Werebear

Night Three: Investigated jadesmar (innocent), sent results to DP, CRiX, and Dourgrim

Night Four: Investigated mathcam (innocent), sent results to DP, CRiX, and jadesmar.

Those who received my results should find that the nights synch up, proving my role claim.

It is of course worth noting that CRiX is now Fishbulb.

Whoo-hoo... I've been holding this in for a while with all this Vizzini bashing :P

Inconceivable!
Rite
User avatar
rite
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
User avatar
User avatar
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
Shameless Bandwagoner
Posts: 464
Joined: December 31, 2002

Post Post #513 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 6:56 am

Post by rite »

Another note: We have no proof of Dourgrim's innocence, do we?
User avatar
Fishbulb
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1322
Joined: July 15, 2003
Location: West Virginia, US

Post Post #514 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 7:03 am

Post by Fishbulb »

Hmmm, I didn't get the Night 3 investigation, just Night 4.

And you are right, we can't clear Dourgrim just because he posted what he got from you. He could still be scum trying to blend in.
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
User avatar
rite
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
User avatar
User avatar
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
Shameless Bandwagoner
Posts: 464
Joined: December 31, 2002

Post Post #515 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 7:10 am

Post by rite »

Sorry, I should have gone over my post first to make sure I hit every point-- the mod randomly sent my investigation to only ONE of the three people I selected.
User avatar
massive
massive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
massive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4918
Joined: July 16, 2003
Location: The Springs, CO

Post Post #516 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 7:46 am

Post by massive »

Well, that certainly makes it harder. I wonder if we can trust any of that info at all? Who received the note about DP's innocence, I wonder? That's the only one that wasn't revealed before rite's roleclaim, and the only one that can prove it either way.

And no, Dourgrim hasn't been cleared by anyone as of yet. Sugar's cleared in my mind because of the townsperson thing. DP busted two Mafia. That puts the list I'd like to hear more from at:

Werebear
Norinel
mikehart
Dourgrim

but I'm a little worried about duping role claims now ... what if Rite sent out that as disinformation and some of those people AREN'T innocent? I still want to maintain my claim that Vizzini HAS to be Mafia.

Wait.

Sugar got CRiX, Dourgrim got CRiX and jadesmar, Fishbulb got mathcam. According to rite's roleclaim, he didn't send the info about CRiX to Dourgrim. So what's the real story?

Man I'm close to voting for rite.
Major FOS with intent to vote: rite
User avatar
rite
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
User avatar
User avatar
rite
Shameless Bandwagoner
Shameless Bandwagoner
Posts: 464
Joined: December 31, 2002

Post Post #517 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:03 am

Post by rite »

I have no idea where Dourgrim's information about CRiX came from... as I've already noted, the information only goes to one of the three people I choose, in this case it was Sugar.

And as for voting for me... how the heck could I get away with this if I was scum? Don't you think whoever's has "really" been giving this information out would have come out by now? And how did I know what night the information was sent out?

Oh, and
FOS: Dourgrim and Fishbulb
. It's possible that Dourgrim made up that he got information about CriX/Fishbulb to cover for fellow scum.
User avatar
Fishbulb
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishbulb
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1322
Joined: July 15, 2003
Location: West Virginia, US

Post Post #518 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:27 am

Post by Fishbulb »

rite wrote:It's possible that Dourgrim made up that he got information about CriX/Fishbulb to cover for fellow scum.
Then Sugar is in on it, too...

Oh, and you, since you were the one that got it in the first place.

I agree about Dourgrim, though. He only came out with innocents after the others, and he didn't even have any new ones. So, if Dourgrim is trying to cover me, I couldn't imagine why, because I say we string him up.
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
User avatar
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
Don't shoot the mod
Posts: 3245
Joined: April 1, 2002
Location: Kampen. Yeah.

Post Post #519 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:30 am

Post by Dragon Phoenix »

:?:
:shock:

Rite - I did not receive ANY of your results you supposedly had forwarded to me.

I still believe you though. I mean, why would you make such complicated stuff up that can immediately be refuted.

Maybe because I am outside the main action in the movie?
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
User avatar
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
Don't shoot the mod
Posts: 3245
Joined: April 1, 2002
Location: Kampen. Yeah.

Post Post #520 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:32 am

Post by Dragon Phoenix »

Oh, missed your post about the random selection.
Someone
Someone
Well, we gotta remove Someone
Someone
Well, we gotta remove Someone
Well, we gotta remove Someone
Posts: 1084
Joined: July 18, 2003
Location: Canada

Post Post #521 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:54 am

Post by Someone »

Unvote: dourgrim



Nothing much to add, of course i want the people on the list that haven't claimed yet to come foward. Also, a check by one of our cops on vizzini may be a good idea. [/b]
This is just here so my posts don't look so ugly when I edit them.
User avatar
massive
massive
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
massive
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4918
Joined: July 16, 2003
Location: The Springs, CO

Post Post #522 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:56 am

Post by massive »

Dourgrim had to have received the info about jadesmar, if you believe rite, because the other two people on the "random distribution" list are Fishbulb and DP, and they both say they didn't get it.

Neither mathcam nor Dourgrim received the Day One info (mathcam, I think, would have said something when he said DP wasn't cleared "per se"), so that means that mole is the only possible recipient.

Rite: I'm not claiming you're not sending the information. I'm claiming that the information you're sending has some hiccups and might not be completely trustworthy.

And I'm actually MORE suspicious of Dourgrim since he claimed to have received info on two people, both of whom were exonerated by proven townies RIGHT before his post, without ever previously mentioning that he had extra info himself.
User avatar
Norinel
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
User avatar
User avatar
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
Not Voting (3)
Posts: 1684
Joined: March 2, 2003
Location: My computer

Post Post #523 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 9:42 am

Post by Norinel »

I'm Westley.

Personally, I think rite's role would also make a nifty mafia spy variant, so he's not completely cleared in my mind.
User avatar
jadesmar
jadesmar
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
jadesmar
Goon
Goon
Posts: 277
Joined: June 24, 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Post Post #524 (ISO) » Fri Sep 12, 2003 10:08 am

Post by jadesmar »

Was I investigated by DP the same night I was investigated by rite?

If the investigations happened the same night, is it possible that information from rite's investigation was sent to DP but overlooked due to his investigation?

Also, I can verify that no information was sent to me, FWIW.
You must be drunk 'cuz you're all blurry.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”