I think that asking a player to explain their incorrect read is a used tactic to get that player to start thinking it more strongly, yes.In post 3693, MariaR wrote:You know, I'll throw you a bone here, let's use your gross over simplification of what happened here even though that wasn't the case and you can easily use context clues to see what did happen. If I wanted to see if Cape would switch I just don't need to bring up Math at all, I'm self-aware enough to know as a wolf how my posts will look in the thread, you don't just put a very basic "omg hey what do you think of this player" that's scum textbook 101. The only time I ever said it could be Math was that I "paused" at the gang up but besides that? Always Enchant.
In post 3453, MariaR wrote:You can try to convince me on why it's Math/Luke and not Enchant/Luke sure.In post 3452, Cape90 wrote:Out of literally everyone Enchant, I have been the only person that has voiced a lean towards Math and not you
I feel like I was pretty clear that I was waiting for Cape to tell me what they thought of my case on Enchant, and making sure we were on the same page.In post 3693, MariaR wrote:where you once again have refused to explain why you didn't vote Enchant the whole dayphase
I cannot even really grasp why you are trying to frame that as a scummy thing for me to do tbh.