Corvuus wrote:
My #1 suspicion is still on Sir. I can state my reasons but I think OC should respond to Sir's PBPA, etc. first.
Because you asked, here it is.
sirdanilot wrote: OC PbPA
Firstly, note the infrequency of OCs posts. This is not a scum tell in itself, but it's worth noting.
Agreed and I need to post more.
sirdanilot wrote: 1 - The infamous jokey-vote on KrisReizer, which I deemed a town-tell at the time. Thing is, it continued the joking phase of the game, essentially giving OC a second random vote, krisreizer. So yeah, I don't think this is that good (scummy)
I did it for the comedic value. Though I do agree that it didn’t help the town.
sirdanilot wrote: 2 - This game theory post is not that bad. However, he says it's important to get people to vote, but a second random vote just doesn't help in my opinion. And then he says that voting so much that 'votes lose their value'is bad. And he admits that his second random vote was a joke vote, so yeah I think this is scummy too. (scummy)
Voting is good as it is important to force the scum to go on the record. It also gives us something to review in the end game. So voting and voting a lot helps, but if you vote too much (like for more then 50% of the players alive) it shows a lack of conviction and makes it seem like your early voting for your scum compatriots.
sirdanilot wrote: 5 - I don't like this. Lurking is not a scum-tell at all times, since there may be tons of reasons for lurkers to lurk, including many that are not game related. (scummy)
I agree that lurking isn’t always a scum tell. But lurking tends to be a viable scum tactic in games where the players let them get away with it.
sirdanilot wrote: 6 - BAD BAD BAD BAD. He prefers to lynch inactive players over active players that are scummy (and yes, lk was scummy at the time). Not a way to play the game. (very scummy)
It is unusual for the scum to let one of their own get lynched on day one. Baring a mistake, it’s usually impossible for the town to get enough momentum to lynch someone the scum don’t want them to lynch. That is why I am a proponent of setting the ground rules on lurking.
sirdanilot wrote: 9 - BAD too, more or less the same as 5, but now he tells people to do the same as he does. (scummy)
I don’t see how this is bad. Refer to my response to number 5
sirdanilot wrote: 10 - This is scummy. He explicitly doesn't take a stance on LK, he even speculates between power-roles and scum. He said lk seemed 'excited' about the game, how is that a tell of any sort? (scummy)
I think I’m pretty good at spotting scum, but I (and many other people) sometimes get the behavior of a player with a pro-town power role confused with the behavior of scum. One of the “tells” that a player is scum is a lot of activity. Usually only very experienced players understand how to properly play a vanilla townie and have fun with it. Many newer players get bored with the game unless they have a fun role or are scum. Therefore activity level is indeed a tell and possibly an indicator that they are scum.
sirdanilot wrote: 12 - ... and he posts 9 days later. 'Not a big fan of lynching active players', that's a scum tell as I mentioned earlier. He limits himself to the two biggest suspects and decides to vote afatchic. In my opinion, not really something a mafia wouldn't do to his partner, but not sure. (scummy-null)
This right here should have put me on your townie list.
sirdanilot wrote: 13 - Bad. The sheer quantity of votes doesn't matter that much, he doesn't take the reasoning and situations into account at all. An effort to look helpful. (scummy)
I am at a total loss as to why you find this post scummy. This post was dead on and since I probably listed the remaining scum in a short list. I think that is why you are attacking me and this post. My logic seems simple and easy to understand, I think I just hit the nail on the head and that is why you’re attempting to find fault with it.
sirdanilot wrote: 15 - This is one of the most interesting posts.
Clearly the votes prior to Kmd4390 role claim are not part of the scum faction. The only exception I would make to that is the potential that TheInvisibleCop could be a scum ruse and that he failed to remove his vote prior to going inactive.
So that makes someone2 and Electra definitely not part of the scum group with AfatChic (still could be SK)
I wonder why you're so sure about that?
Although SensFan switched his vote back to Afatchic after the role claim by Kmd4390, he did it right away and scum would probably not do that.
I think this reasoning is flawed, scum could very well do that, since kmd was WAY less likely to be lynched than afat, and they'd want to distance themselves from afat before it'd be too late.
I think the reasoning is pretty solid. Those votes were done early enough that when they were made, afatchick wasn’t threatened by getting lynched. It’s these votes that actually put him in that position. And that is why those players are the ones that are least likely to be scum.
sirdanilot wrote: 16 - And I have told you why this post was so bad on the previous page. Quoting my own post for reference.
sirdanilot wrote:OverCaffeinated wrote:I think your arguments about Electra are ok ones Sirdanilot, but I really doubt the third person to vote for AFatChic would be scum.
Why?
In that light, your arguments against Electra seem to be stretched and manufactured. I don’t know if it is from OMGUS, or you are a scum trying to create doubt, or both.
First my arguments are ok. Now they are bad. This doesn't make sense, what a horrible reason to vote me, OC.
My vote is not OMGUS at all. I specifically explained my vote and why it is not omgus.
But whatever the reason, you are trying to lynch one of the three players I am pretty sure are townies.
Vote: sirdanilot
And I am not sure at all that electra is a townie. I am entitled to my opinion, and I am only contributing to the town by scumhunting.
OC, how about build a case on me or something if you think I am scum? Because right now you are just assuming that I am scum which allows you to read my OK arguments to vote Electra in a different light. This is not a good reason to vote me.
Electra, you failed to address all my points and defenses in #523. Reply to it.
This re-read made OC rise on my suspicion list.
FoS OC
. I don't feel comfortable voting him over Electra yet though, I want to hear more from him first.
As I have stated previously, I voted for you solely on the fact you were voting to lynch one of the two players that we knew from the day 1 vote record that they were most likely townies. That is a HUGE scum tell. Since then your OMGUS vote, your ceaseless attacking of Corvuus and this apparent affinity with SensFan have given me more reasons.
I am tempted to change my vote just to get the game moving again, but I just cant seem to find any candidate better then sirdanilot to vote for.