In post 2417, Majiffy wrote:But you haven't given me anything to work with. All of your interactions have been skin-deep at best.
"skin-deep".
Pretty sure my ISO says otherwise.
In post 2417, Majiffy wrote:But you haven't given me anything to work with. All of your interactions have been skin-deep at best.
In post 2425, Majiffy wrote:In post 2423, geists wrote:In post 2417, Majiffy wrote:But you haven't given me anything to work with. All of your interactions have been skin-deep at best.
"skin-deep".
Pretty sure my ISO says otherwise.
Show me your great big deep insightful reach-outs to me.
In post 2428, notscience wrote:In post 2044, Lemniscate wrote:I can't defend against what other people did. This is another strawmanning attempt.
Nobody has actually made any case on me, but rather my predecessors. I have nothing to say to their play, I'm not them. I have no idea why they played that way. All I can say is a quick meta on Rhaego, is his play style matches his play here. Regardless of alignment. Wake literally only posted twice and then replaced out, there wasn't even enough time to read Wake.
The case on me is terrible, though it doesn't surprise me that a wagon has formed on me, seeing the terrible people on the wagon right now. I've already had scum reads on several of them, before they ever jumped on board.
Like for example:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Nero Cain
this game
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4968751
Sitcom
In post 2433, notscience wrote:QUESTION
Did I read soemthing about Rhaego being a secret alt
pedit-
Because she felt like noone gave a shit. There's so much going on, she felt overwhelmed (which was in her iso btw). So what if she didn't mention names. Half the playerlist has lurked and hasn't even mentioned half the game.
She yelled at Nati for calling anything she's done surface level. She's a newbie. Are you telling me you had deep insights in your first game, let alone one with 28 fucking players?
Newbscum reaction wouldn't have been such a violent reaction. They are more tame.
In post 2435, Majiffy wrote:In post 2429, geists wrote:Majiffy wrote:
You know I can provide a lengthy list of day 1s illustrating why.
Oh boy, D1 lynches that flipped town? Thatneverhappens! You should probably just ignore me because*lengthy list*!
Don't give me your bullshit ffery.
In post 2440, notscience wrote:Also-
When you make an alt to hide your main account's meta it's to succeed better as one alignment. Which is it?
Do you think if they got that alignment they'd play that fucking useless all game?
In post 2445, Majiffy wrote:I want you to stop dodging me for bullshit reasons and actually address the contributions I have made to this game and to the shos wagon.
In post 2457, beastcharizard wrote:We all suck at PO. IMO we all seem to have a similar play style because we play with each other. This is why I have this conceived notion that I can read anyone that comes from PO.
@ns:
How did you find that out?
In post 2458, notscience wrote:Based on her first post about TSO and her having unique interactions with other people from it
In post 2481, AngryIcerink wrote:In post 2479, geists wrote:Iec who do you think should be lynched, given the claims.
I think they are all town. Probably Lemniscate is the best bet. I do like her iso fairly well though. I would honestly prefer a flashwagon on a non-entity, but I guess Lemniscate is close enough to a non-entity that it bothers me less than shos or xof.
If I were notDespite being the same slot as him, I am quite peeved at AP for basically preventing this from happening by freaking out 4 days before deadline when it was no big deal. I wish I had posted more, but I was traveling Sunday and am in classes 9-6 or so and then raid til 9 PM every day this week and then I have to prepare for the next day, so I've had to really sneak in my catch-up and posting times and have had low presence as a result, so I feel responsible for what I consider to be poor tactical choices, etc.
The situation with shos particularly pisses me off because I've read him as town all game and there was no reason for him to claim and I feel like our slot played a role in that, but I kind of went along with it anyway.
Xof gets an A for effort I guess. I would feel stupid for lynching her prematurely given the level of episodic detail in her claim. Leaving lemniscate. But I didn't really townread her until I was catching up and saw that AP had had read whiplash on her.
I am a little concerned that my annoyance at the situation is partly related to my discomfort with AP's approach to the game the previous few pages. I normally get annoyed when people read me as scum in games, and it becomes a game event for me, and then I can help get oriented. But in this game I basically agree that AP has posted things that would make any rational person kind of read it twice, so I can't have my normal reaction when someone reads us as scum. I am worried that it is messing up things.
The more I think about it the less annoyed I am about lynching lemn I guess. I am more annoyed at AP.
Sorry I love you. <3
- Iec
In post 2495, AngryIcerink wrote:It's the only post I made/signed. I can see that it would be easy to miss in the wake of all of AP's posts pushing a wagon on townreads 4 days before deadline, though.
In post 2246, AngryIcerink wrote:Unvote; Vote: TheGoat
I will vanity wagon TheGoat for 24 hours and switch to probably xof after that time passes if it hasn't taken off.
I have not discussed this with AP.
-Iec
From my POV it was my most recent post.
-Iec
In post 2549, beastcharizard wrote:I have seen it happen once and I believe it was with Cabd calling in someone. He admitted it at the end of the game as well.
In post 2568, Birds of Prey wrote:The same damn people have been voting in unison.
That is NOT natural behavior.
- Titus
In post 2585, notscience wrote:The mistake in order also makes me doubt it
pedit-
Hi ffery
Do you like bop
In post 2576, Nero Cain wrote:In post 2562, notscience wrote:Geists
Majiffy
lemni
Sven
Kinda liked bulba
liked molla at one point
shos
I'm leaning always town
Agree with molla, giests and sven
Bulb is lurking really bad and seems so unlike him
I think jiffy scum could easily tunnel on shos all day
Not big fans of the play from either shos or lemi
In post 2593, ProHawk wrote:In post 2592, geists wrote:I don't think he'd indiscriminately alienate other players in the process.
I think I have seen this happen before.
In post 2604, Mist7676 wrote:In post 2294, geists wrote:In post 2282, Mist7676 wrote:In post 2241, shos wrote:I am Inuyasha,Town DemonScenter Searching Empathic Vigilante.
Lol @ role name yea indeed
Basically I use tessaiga to duel someone, and I can learn 1s abilities from it, which are probably likely vigging abilities.
Also, each morning I am told if i was targetted at night, and by what. This can be undead, demon, both or none.
Here he says Town Demon
In post 1137, shos wrote:I'll rephrase everything for you.
my role pm has the word undead, and somewhere in it,it also has the word demon, when not relating to me, okay?so I took that as a 'oh the scum are probably the undead and demons'. and that's it. alrgiht? now. you're town mhork, so stfu and move on.
Tis Bird of Prey character is town. who did he replace?
Here he claims that he isn't a Demon. Scum is caught, good night everyone.
That is not a slip of any sort. Regardless of Shos' alignment.
Yay! Quoting things that happened 11 pages ago! Blah Blah 100 pages, yaas gaga.
So this just proves that Shos is being inconsistent which is really shady.
The fact that so many people jumped into the Lemni wagon is really bad and should be noticed more carefully. I feel these people should consider jumping back on the Shos wagon. What's holding you back? The main character, I'm just going to repeat what everyone else is saying, but maybe some people will listen?Trying to flavor game is stupid, and the main character can be scum or town. Shos play is shoddy.
In post 2620, notscience wrote:I still want to lynch ynb
regardless of their claim
ffery if you want to start a new wagon just tell me who and i'll assist
In post 2620, notscience wrote:I still want to lynch ynb
regardless of their claim
ffery if you want to start a new wagon just tell me who and i'll assist
In post 2638, AngryIcerink wrote:geists, do you guys have a read on Prohawk? I kinda think he is scum. Not that he is lynchable Today, but I want someone to actually bring him up.
In post 2645, notscience wrote:I hope lemni isn't intentionally avoiding the game
because that might mean I'm wrong
In post 2647, HighShroomish wrote:In post 2626, geists wrote:Who's here and willing to switch to Mist?
*raises hand*
@NS good thing I'm not the only one worried about PH...
In post 2648, notscience wrote:In post 2626, geists wrote:Who's here and willing to switch to Mist?
I offer my allegiance to thee
In post 2714, Always wrote:In post 2711, geists wrote:I don't really like anything about how lemniscate claimed.
Most of the wagons feel like they should be easy lynches in this player list. I think part of my hesitation is basically gambler's fallacy.
I really don't see how she would leave 'clues' to her partners in thread and not in the PT if she has day talk. A lot of what she says really mirrors exactly what Mastin has been saying.
I rather not explain further, but that's what at most makes this whole claim feel off.
~Mala
In post 2758, Majiffy wrote:In other news, geists looks bad for hopping off the Lemi wagon as it reaches near-lynch.
In post 2793, notscience wrote:So, my plan stays.
The plan is as follows (assuming this other mason claims): Lynch the other "mason". If they flip town we don't touch lemni. They flip scum we lynch lemni tomorrow.
In post 2805, Moogle Dance Troupe wrote:With abom's post, the list of people who I'd conceivably believe to be a mason with lemni has shrunk to 3 people.
In post 2809, AngryIcerink wrote:In post 2803, geists wrote:In post 2798, notscience wrote:Elaborate
I won't lynch someone I'm townreading.
???
They're going to share an alignment if they claim. That's how Masons work.
The only possibility is if a truly-touched town individual fakeclaims masons with scum to "protect" the mason team, but I doubt you would townread someone so foolish up to this point anyway.
I guess I might be inclined to temporarily shelve the plan altogether if the other person is very very obvtown.
- Iec
notscience wrote:@ffery- Funny, that sounds an awful lot like an open game where I got past d1
In post 2835, AngryIcerink wrote:In post 2833, notscience wrote:In FEA cephrir gave us 4 fakeclaims at the start of the game.
OK.
Has he ever done the thing where he lets scum request a fakeclaim on the fly to go with a particular ability fakeclaim?
This is one of the two possibilities listed in the 2-3 paragraphs.
- Iec
In post 2911, neil1113 wrote:I didn't realize Majiffy had evidence.