In post 452, Magister Ludi wrote:Uberninja wrote:I don't like the Alchemist votes. They're disingenuous and lazy.
I beg to differ. Why are you calling them disingenuous and lazy? Do you take issue with any other votes so far in the game?
I don't think he's scum. Therefore I don't like the votes.
As for why they're disingenuous and lazy:
This one's so lazy that she didn't even bother to post again and re-vote when her vote tags were broken.
In post 325, Nikanor wrote:As for Alchemist... have you read his posts? Go through his iso, ignoring the picture (glorified iioa btw), and tell me how you don't find him scummy.
I was going to hold off on switching my votes for a bit to avoid the whole "he's switching his vote because he's getting flak for it!" bullshit that's inevitably going to erupt from
somebody
's mouth before I realised that I don't give a fuck.
Mentioning this means that nobody's going to use it against me right right?
Unvote. Vote: Alchemist.
Voting Alchemist for "go through his iso and tell me how you don't find him scummy" is lazy as fuck.
In post 329, Magister Ludi wrote:317 makes a Tammy lynch unappealing at the moment.
Unvote
Vote: Alchemist
+++ signal to noise ratio, he's got 25 (fifth most) posts and little to show for it.
This one's self explanatory, but I'll explain it anyway. Voting because somebody's "posting a lot without saying anything" is better than the previous two votes, but it's still nowhere near up to what I'd consider voting somebody for, especially in this lively posting/voting climate.
So, disingenuousness it is.
In post 381, Nexus wrote:Arghleblarghleflarghle this game exploded.
Just posting to get it in my view new posts and to let you all know I'm here.
Zdenek has, imo, made sense so far. Not liking Alchemist, a lot of fluff posting for the amount of posts he's made.
VOTE: Alchemist
Semi away until Tuesday evening now.
This is the only post Nexus had made thus far, about 400 posts into the game (and it's still the only vote he's made).
If that's not a fucking lazy vote I don't know what is.
The vote is for the same reason as Magister Ludi's, being the signal-to-noise ratio.
Have either of these players done any meta on Timeater to find out whether it's the norm as town or scum? No, apparently not. Which means both previous votes are even lazier.
In post 382, Glork wrote:At work. Have not read last 2-3 pages much at all. Jumping Alchemist wagon for this alone.
Vote: Alchemist
By "this alone" he means post 380 by Alchemist, which I found dripping with pro-town sarcasm at best, and mildly entertaining at worst.
The "have not read the last 2-3 pages much at all" is lazy. And jumping on a 4-person wagon for a single post, after making absolutely no alignment-indicative posts about Alchemist beforehand, is very possible disingenuous.
Hope this helps!