I much prefer town to mafia. Although strategizing in the quicktopic is fun.
It'll be interesting to see how the non-hostile "cult" thing works out, I kinda wish I'd picked that.
Why do you think there's a cult leader DGB?DrippingGoofball wrote:^^^Jack wrote:##vote:Ojanen
I much prefer town to mafia. Although strategizing in the quicktopic is fun.
It'll be interesting to see how the non-hostile "cult" thing works out, I kinda wish I'd picked that.
10,000 Bonus points!
Serving you the cult leader on a platter.
I imagine it would be, inescapably. But saying what I like about being scum isn't (even though scum can daytalk I see, which is what makes being scum the most fun imo).Fishythefish wrote:##vote: Jack
Giving a reason why you chose to be scum is scummy.
I didn't need OJ to explain anything.Weird defense of Oj also - doesn't feel like a genuine reaction to Parama's comment, trying to undermine it before it was either explained or commented on by Oj.
I don't remember seeing it either. But checking the pm it does say "keep in mind the player list!" and links to it. So that takes care of Nico's comment.UncertainKitten wrote:@VP: um...everyone saw the playerlist before picking alignment. Zoraster LINKS you to it in the choose your side PM
I don't understand why you even said that.
That's not true. If you chose town you didn't just think about why you like town. You also thought about what you don't like about town, what you like about scum, and what you don't like about scum.Fishythefish wrote:@Jack:
- I think that the line "Here's why I would have chosen scum if I had, but I didn't" is more likely to come from scum than town. Because you would be thinking more about reasons for choosing scum.
You can't see a reason to do it? That's nice, but scum are more likely to think about "reasons for doing something". And people who keep their cards close to their chest the whole game for some ungodly reason.- You undermined Parama's comment without really knowing what he was saying. The lineis discrediting Parama's attack without really knowing what it entails, and I can't see any reason to do that.Jack wrote:It sounds like Parama has some weird idea that Ojananen is rolefishing or made a slip or one of those silly things people jump on.
No I didn't, that's not important, and that's irrelevant.You say Nico's defense is "minimalist". What, exactly, has he failed to defend, or how should his defense be expanded?
That's not what "non-hostile" means DGBDrippingGoofball wrote:ADMISSION OF GUILTJack wrote:You should put "non-hostile cult leader" if you're going to go with that.
Sorry, can't reread. Maybe you could quote the post where you pursued your suspicions of someone else before your "I like my vote right now, but I can certainly deal with a xvart lynch. " post.Gammagooey wrote:Jack-It's pretty great that you can't even read 4 posts back to see my question to DGB about Zor or look at my first two posts to see my reads on UK Llama and Zor, it really says a lot about how much actual thinking you're putting behind your votes.
That's a lot of reasons. What did you expect to possibly learn from DGB?Zorblag wrote:@Debonair Danny DiPietro, there were a couple reasons that I went with Phate as the lurker that was the most appealing to see if there was interest in lynching. The one that I think is most likely to appeal to you is that unlike most (all perhaps) of the others on the lurker list he's got his second post where he tries to look like he's following the game by asking a question that should have an obvious answer about DrippingGoofball's opinion. Given your reaction to Nicodemus's careless read of what DrippingGoofball said I thought it might appeal to you.
The others which I don't think are that likely to sway you are convenience (he was the lurker with a vote other than mine at the time) and because I wanted to see what DrippingGoofball would do when I brought him up as out of place for the rest of her reads.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh