babygirl86 wrote:woa guys its still early in day 1 and xtoxm is already at l-2? I'm not sure bout that- we've barely had time to gather any info at all.
Ok, so you are trying to stop the bandwagon here on the player who seems to be the scummiest. I agree that this would have been too quick of a lynch but the fact that you try to stop this one and then you jump on others enough that I am looking back at this makes me think that I may be right about BOTH xtoxm and you.
babygirl86 wrote:Here's my thoughts on the situation. Although I hate the idea of claiming day one, in this case I find it somewhat helpful- at least we know now that there are restrictions and to expect the unexpected so to speak. As for xtoxm's attacking LF, I don't find it scummy but I don't like it. I haven't played in any games with him(I don't think) so I don't really know his playstyle- maybe he can just be overly aggressive. I definately don't like the idea of lynching someone just because their vote doesn't count- if LF has a good idea of who is scum, he still has the capability of trying to influence other players to see someone's scumminess- sort of like the bandwagon on xtoxm now.
So you disagree with xtoxm but you defend him in the same post.
babygirl86 wrote:to a certain extent, I can understand why LF would be attacking txoxm- who wouldnt attack the person thats been attacking them from the start? but there is a certain level as to where the attacks would be acceptable and I do agree that LF's attacks are a bit overboard. I would personally like to hear something from dalt, considering his last post consisted of a vote and no reasoning.
Makes Llama's case look like OMGUS after others have already shown suspicion towards xtoxm.
Calls out dalt immediately after a few others point out the vote as being suspicious.
babygirl86 wrote:I don't see anything overly scummy about ghostwriter at all. Dalt, however is still suspicious to me. Although it was only one day, he has indeed posted since he posted his vote here and left. That makes me wonder if he is avoiding explaining his vote.
unvote, vote dalt
IG and xtoxm have already voted dalt at this time. BG has called out dalt but hasn't voted until this point.
babygirl86 wrote:xtoxm- you are pushing waaaay too hard for this lynch to happen, and its obvious it't not going to happen- at least not day 1. What are your thoughts on dalt, who quite a few others believe to be scum? I looked back in posts, and imo it does look like an unofficial claim, however do we really know what a claim of cleveland could mean? my vote stands
I agree that xtoxm was pushing a bad case hard here. You get your suspicion confused here though. The case on Dalt was a bandwagoning case and you talk about the cleveland claim which was actually gobo. Scum are building cases on people who they know are townies and therefore don't genuinely believe the case (barring bussing). This confusion leads me to believe that you are trying to force cases here.
babygirl86 wrote:I agree. Although I did attempt to read into it awhile back, the more I thought about it and realized that its stupid to keep talking about it. people make quotes in this game- we're playing family guy mafia- theres a million great quotes! I think that we need to just move on and ignore the so-called 'claims' until further in the game when people start making actual claims. Hopefully the game will start progressing again now that we have replacements. I agree that LF's play could be considered scummy- if he hadn't brought up a so-called claim in the first place, we couldnt' have gotten caught up in a character claim when we chould be trying to find scum here.
unvote, vote LF
What a quick change. The claim was scummy before but now it's stupid to talk about? Also, quick to jump on llama's bandwagon.
Conclusion: BG was on two of the three bandwagons that I noticed. Other connections to xtoxm can be seen. Possible scum pair?