Mini 653 - Family Guy Mafia - Game over

Xtoxm · Post Post #1500 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:41 pm

reborn537 wrote:
RestFermata wrote:I thought GW was town, too, but like I said, I had to be wrong about at least one person.
Where did GW lie?

Guys - I can see GW as a valid scum nk.

Also, we need to be sure Rock is scum before we start treating LF as confirmed and take his word as gospel. That is why Rock has to go first.

Rock basically is confirmed scum, yous hould be able to see that by now.

Also, him being scum does not ocnfirm LF to be town. He could have been bussing/distancing.

I just think LF is telling the truth, and is town.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1501 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:42 pm

reborn537 wrote:
Xtoxm wrote:
I by no means see this as open and shut, and want to know why LF thought he had someone cleared, and how that scans with the evidence he's produced.
I had a feeling that LF had a quilty result on GW and he just wanted scum to think he had an innocent so that said scum would continue to play as normal, and potentially make links to buddies. Obviously I didn't say that at the time.
Guilty result = insta-claim.

No, not always. Like I can, it can be useful to keep the scum around and make them talk before claiming it.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1502 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:42 pm

Like I said*

reborn537 · Post Post #1503 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:44 pm

Xtoxm wrote:
reborn537 wrote:
RestFermata wrote:I thought GW was town, too, but like I said, I had to be wrong about at least one person.
Where did GW lie?

Guys - I can see GW as a valid scum nk.

Also, we need to be sure Rock is scum before we start treating LF as confirmed and take his word as gospel. That is why Rock has to go first.
Rock basically is confirmed scum, yous hould be able to see that by now.

Also, him being scum does not ocnfirm LF to be town. He could have been bussing/distancing.

I just think LF is telling the truth, and is town.

Rock is not definitely scum. Farside could have given him a weird role like the rest of us. I feel his silence is more damning than anything else.

He's still our play for today. I want 100% certainty of his alignment.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1504 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:46 pm

He has falsely claimed, claim changed, and is self-voting...

reborn537 · Post Post #1505 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:47 pm

When did Rock self vote? I must have missed that.

reborn537 · Post Post #1506 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:48 pm

Lol, just found it.

Can we get a hammer please.

1 in the hand is worth two in the bushel.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1507 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:48 pm

1473, page 59.

Are you not checking the bottom of previous pages again?

reborn537 · Post Post #1508 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:49 pm

WTF@bushel?

two in the bush*

RestFermata · Post Post #1509 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:49 pm

But then why would BG lie and say she had no other special powers?

I mean, I've heard of lovers having other roles besides essentially vanilla, particularly cop. But it's pretty damning that he claimed the wrong role, and either way it means one of the two, BG or Rock is lying.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1510 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:49 pm

reborn537 wrote:Lol, just found it.

Can we get a hammer please.

1 in the hand is worth two in the bushel.

No. Apart form anything, we still stalling about stuffs...

And Kmd unvoted.

reborn537 · Post Post #1511 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:49 pm

Xtoxm wrote:1473, page 59.

Are you not checking the bottom of previous pages again?

While I'm posting people make 6 more posts and suddenly I'm on a new page. The pace of this game is ridiculous, but not unpleasantly so.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1512 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:50 pm

*Still talking

LlamaFluff · Post Post #1513 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:51 pm

No. No hammer yet untill I am 100% sure no one else could of blocked that kill. What happened was one of

1) GW was scum submitting the kill, got RBed
2) GW was targeted for a NK, got healed
3) Someone else stopped a kill

reborn537 · Post Post #1514 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:54 pm

LlamaFluff wrote:No. No hammer yet untill I am 100% sure no one else could of blocked that kill. What happened was one of

1) GW was scum submitting the kill, got RBed
2) GW was targeted for a NK, got healed
3) Someone else stopped a kill

This sounds like you're encouraging a mass claim. Let's not, k?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1515 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:54 pm

Sorry if some one said this already but maybe GW WAS the NK target.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1516 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:54 pm

Yes. Thinking about the action-miss possibility mentioned, I think we can ignore it, actually. It's possible Rock may have, but I don't think the other scum would have let something like that happen, everyone else is interested enough in the game. Whenever i've been scum i've always done my best to make sure that deosn't happen, I usually inform the mod of what our action is, even if i'm not the doing the kill.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1517 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:56 pm

reborn537 wrote:
LlamaFluff wrote:No. No hammer yet untill I am 100% sure no one else could of blocked that kill. What happened was one of

1) GW was scum submitting the kill, got RBed
2) GW was targeted for a NK, got healed
3) Someone else stopped a kill
This sounds like you're encouraging a mass claim. Let's not, k?

Not a MC, but RF, STD, Kloud, and KMD should all say whether or not they could have stopped a kill last night, imo.

I highly doubt it, with IG being a protective role, and LF also having a protective ability.

reborn537 · Post Post #1518 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:56 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Sorry if some one said this already but maybe GW WAS the NK target.

Exactly.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1519 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:58 pm

reborn537 wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Sorry if some one said this already but maybe GW WAS the NK target.
Exactly.

Yes. I haven't ignored the possibility, but it does seem very unlikely. Behind our lynch target, GW was the one with the most suspicion being cast upon him at the end of yesterday. Why would scum want to take out someone so widely being called scum?

reborn537 · Post Post #1520 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:58 pm

Xtoxm wrote:
reborn537 wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Sorry if some one said this already but maybe GW WAS the NK target.
Exactly.
Yes. I haven't ignored the possibility, but it does seem very unlikely. Behind our lynch target, GW was the one with the most suspicion being cast upon him at the end of yesterday. Why would scum want to take out someone so widely being called scum?

I don't agree with this.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1521 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:59 pm

reborn537 wrote:
Guys - I can see GW as a valid scum nk.

Also, we need to be sure Rock is scum before we start treating LF as confirmed and take his word as gospel. That is why Rock has to go first.

Yeah.
Rock is scum.
GW is either scum or was targeted by scum.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1522 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:00 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:
reborn537 wrote:
Guys - I can see GW as a valid scum nk.

Also, we need to be sure Rock is scum before we start treating LF as confirmed and take his word as gospel. That is why Rock has to go first.
Yeah.
Rock is scum.
GW is either scum or was targeted by scum.

Well, probably, but not necessarily.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1523 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:00 pm

reborn537 wrote: Guilty result = insta-claim.

Or push the lynch and if you aren't getting it, claim.

reborn537 · Post Post #1524 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:02 pm

Xtoxm, I'm sorry for what I'm about to say but this is only a game so I'm going to say it - I think you're intent on surviving to the point of becoming anti-town. I think you're blowing smoke in every direction to distract the town from the correct lynch today.

Remember, even if you die, you still win if we win (if you're town).