Mini 1830 - Game Over
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Whew, that was quite a bit to catch up on.
My current thoughts: I'm quite happy with my current vote on Huntress; she's looking very scummy right now. Gerry's sudden attack on House looks pretty suspicious; malpascp's posting looks pretty neutral, which earns him a place as the least townish of People I Think Are Town for the moment. Gerry's earlier push on Gamma is now making it look like no-one could reasonably be on a scumteam with Gamma, which puts Gamma a little Townier than malpascp. House and Manuel sit firmly on the Townier end at the moment.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Well, he won't admit to that, so I want to see what answer he comes up with...In post 2019, House wrote:
He kinda has to, that's her buddy.In post 2018, CCC wrote:
Why do you sayIn post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.Houseis the fake one?-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Parsing error - did you perhaps mean to type "doesn't"?In post 2022, House wrote:gerry overplayed his hand because he's locked in to buddies with Huntress and they'll be chain lynched if town does derp and lynch the towniest fucking player in the game.
Although if they'll lynchme, then I officially write them off as being too stupid to win.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Bulletproof makes some sense as a Town claim, but it makes even more sense as a Scum claim.In post 2023, Manuel87 wrote:@malpascp: why do you call intent after that claim? Because Bullet-proof actually makes a lot of sense if you ask me.
- It doesn't have night actions (the results of which would have to be guessed)
- It doesn't give Huntress any additional information to confirm the role
- If by some miracle she doesn't get lynched today, it gives scum perfect reason tonotnightkill her
- Especially given that it would be thefourthPR claim, it's unlikely to be counterclaimed
What would possibly make a better scum claim?-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
My current thinking on this question:In post 2029, House wrote:Talk to me, who else can possibly be scum aside from Huntress and gerry?
If Huntress flips red (as expected) then Gerry will be my top remaining scumread.
If Huntress flips green (the unexpected outcome) then I will need to re-evaluate all my reads in the light of whoever gets nightkilled. In this situation, Gamma, House, and malpascp are all possibilities.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
...oh, right, if Town lynches youIn post 2031, House wrote:
No. They won't have anybody else to hide behind if I'm lynched so any halfway bright town can carry the torch and quicklynch them back to back.In post 2030, CCC wrote:
Parsing error - did you perhaps mean to type "doesn't"?In post 2022, House wrote:gerry overplayed his hand because he's locked in to buddies with Huntress and they'll be chain lynched if town does derp and lynch the towniest fucking player in the game.
Although if they'll lynchme, then I officially write them off as being too stupid to win.first, then we'd presumably lynch Huntress/Gerry on the following days. (In my eyes, though, Manuel is still Townier than you are; if I ignore myself, you're only the second-Towniest player in the game)-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Gamma voted in post 1822. House voted for Huntress in post 1845, twenty-six hours later. Gamma is not following House onto this wagon.In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote:
One is still Gamma because he is sheeping you hard right now without thinking about the case you present or asking you any questions about it.In post 2029, House wrote: Talk to me, who else can possibly be scum aside from Huntress and gerry?
He is just following you blindly and that he wanted to vote Huntress over Gerry is also one of the reasons why i dont want to lynch her today.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Yeah, that's very much the low-probability outcome at this point.In post 2039, House wrote:
We gonna 1v1 if she actually flips town (as if).In post 2037, CCC wrote:
My current thinking on this question:In post 2029, House wrote:Talk to me, who else can possibly be scum aside from Huntress and gerry?
If Huntress flips red (as expected) then Gerry will be my top remaining scumread.
If Huntress flips green (the unexpected outcome) then I will need to re-evaluate all my reads in the light of whoever gets nightkilled. In this situation, Gamma, House, and malpascp are all possibilities.
That's why he's the Towniest player in this game, yes.In post 2041, House wrote:
Manuel is never getting lynched. He's scum!confirmed town lol.In post 2040, CCC wrote:
...oh, right, if Town lynches youIn post 2031, House wrote:
No. They won't have anybody else to hide behind if I'm lynched so any halfway bright town can carry the torch and quicklynch them back to back.In post 2030, CCC wrote:
Parsing error - did you perhaps mean to type "doesn't"?In post 2022, House wrote:gerry overplayed his hand because he's locked in to buddies with Huntress and they'll be chain lynched if town does derp and lynch the towniest fucking player in the game.
Although if they'll lynchme, then I officially write them off as being too stupid to win.first, then we'd presumably lynch Huntress/Gerry on the following days. (In my eyes, though, Manuel is still Townier than you are; if I ignore myself, you're only the second-Towniest player in the game)-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Something just occurred to me. Huntress is currently voting House on the basis that she doesn't believe there are four PRs, right? And she claims to have one of those PRs, while the other two (Square and Victor) are mod-confirmed and certain.
If Huntress is telling the truth, then, she knew about the four PRs since the start of the day.
So, question for Huntress - why didn't you vote House from thestartof today? Why the wait until you were forced to claim?-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
In post 2046, gerryoat wrote:
Because I think him and Gamma are the team. His refusal to admit Gamma's scumminess is something I don't think he'd do as town.In post 2018, CCC wrote:
Why do you sayIn post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.Houseis the fake one?In post 2047, gerryoat wrote:
BECAUSE GAMMA IS OBVIOUS MAFIA. IF YOU CANT REALIZE THIS THEN YOU HAVE TO BE MAFIA, YOU CANNOT BE THIS BAD AS TO TOWNREAD HIMIn post 2035, House wrote:
If he was scum he could have easily justified hammering Huntress and had my support tomorrow if he left me alive.In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote:He is dead set on hammering her because she claimed Bullet-proof? Doesnt make sense to me.
Look at Gerry's play dude. He DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ME UNTIL I DERAILED THE GAMMA WAGON AND STARTED PUSHING HUNTRESS.
His scumclaiming is all over the place, and the association with Huntress is so glaringly obvious it hurts.
Ladies and gentlemen, Gerryoat is scum.
Look at what he's saying here; he says he's scumreading House because House is protecting the "obvious mafia" Gamma.
That is to say; his scumread on House depends on his scumread of Gamma. Therefore, he must be scumreading Gamma harder than House. Gamma, who was scumread enough to be almost lynched yesterday; versus House, one of the most Townread players in the game.
Remember the last time we saw this argument in use? Where someone votes for person A, using reasoning which shows they must be scumreading person B even harder than person A?
It formed the cornerstone of House's case on Eager, and now Gerryoat is doing exactly the same thing.
Gerryoat is now the scummiest player in the game.
VOTE: gerryoat-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
I can see how Scum!House would benefit from that, but he gained enough Towncred from pushing the eagerSnake lynch that even after his push on Victor he's still on the Townier side. (If he manages to ram through a lynch on Town *again* then I might have to re-examine his slot, but for today, he's Town).In post 2048, gerryoat wrote:I think CCC is being dumb town for not realizing that it was optimal for house to bus eager and take control of the town.
No, he's arrogant and thinks a lot of himself. This is perfectly consistent with his previous Town play.In post 2048, gerryoat wrote:He also made 0 sense as to why he would be on no one as BG.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
malpascp is currently my weakest Townread; honestly, the only reason I'm Townreading him right now is because I have heavy scumreads on both Huntress and Gerryoat. (Considered in isolation, malpascp would be a pretty near complete null).In post 2067, Manuel87 wrote:
I am not blaming him for not knowing the motive but he tries to brush it off as if it has nothing to do with him and i will not accept that.In post 2056, House wrote:
He's blaming mal for not knowing the motives behind the previous owner of the slot's actions.In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote:He also played dumb about the lolhammer his slot did when i mentioned it.
LOOK AT IT!
Just because the slot is replaced doesnt mean my read on him is reset.
Yes, Jester's hammer came from Malpa's slot. This doesn't mean Malpa has any idea why Jester did it. Playing dumb about the lolhammer is a pretty null action.
As compared to Gerryoat, who just made theexactsame logic error that caused House's day one scumread on Eager; or Huntress, who seems to have suddenly gained a PR (and suspicions attached to it) only when required to claim. I know you're strongly Townreading Huntress, but could I persuade you to vote for Gerryoat?-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Gerry and Huntress are the scumteam, with extremely high probability. I expect to be voting for one of the two of them today.In post 2072, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh my fuck.
If mal, Manuel, or CCC agrees to this shit charade I'm gonna replace out, because I can't watch you guys act so plainly against your own win con.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Oh, I see what you're getting at, now. In which case you're asking the wrong question.In post 2081, Huntress wrote:
How does it make sense to you that scum would choose to leave House alive at risk to themselves just to push a lynch on a player who you think is already an easy lynch, and little or no threat to them? It doesn't to me, yet that is the reason House has been putting forward for his continued existence, which you are accepting too easily.In post 2015, CCC wrote:
Of those two? House would have been the bigger long-term threat. Gamma would have been little to no threat (due to being mislynch bait).In post 1988, Huntress wrote:
If both were town, which do you think scum would consider more of a threat: House or Gamma?In post 1751, CCC wrote:I'm giving the "Gamma Is Town" hypothesis a good look because I think that House has a good point; leaving House alive looks a lot like trying to end up getting Gamma lynched, which suggests that it might be a mislynch.
I don't see the relevance.
The right question isn't whether House orGamma(who looked like easy mislynch bait at the end of Day 2) would be the greater long-term threat. The right question to ask is whether House orGrendelwould have been the greatershort-term(i.e. over the next Day) threat.
Given how hard House was pushing Gamma and his previous success in pushing his scumreads to lynch, House would have looked less threatening over asingleday than Grendel; scum would presumably have expected House to push Gamma to a lynch, and then would either have nightkilled House the following night or tried to mislynch him on Day 4.
...alright, I went back and checked. You voted House five days after the start of the thread and... hmmm... twenty-five hours before you claimed. Timing still seems very suspicious, especially considering you don't seem to have much of a case on me (the person you were voting before House)In post 2081, Huntress wrote:
No, the four PRs wasn't the only reason for voting House. I didn't even mention that until I claimed (for obvious reasons). If you read my posts you will see the concerns I had about House, and why I didn't vote him immediately. I was still weighing up both sides of the equation.In post 2044, CCC wrote:Something just occurred to me. Huntress is currently voting House on the basis that she doesn't believe there are four PRs, right? And she claims to have one of those PRs, while the other two (Square and Victor) are mod-confirmed and certain.
If Huntress is telling the truth, then, she knew about the four PRs since the start of the day.
So, question for Huntress - why didn't you vote House from thestartof today? Why the wait until you were forced to claim?
As for your last point, there was only one vote on me when I voted House. No question of me being forced to claim then so you're wrong about that.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Your reaction to the vote on you is looking a lot like scum. You've tried presenting subtly flawed logic to support the Gamma lynch; and gerryoat, who I have other reason to scumread and am currently voting for (see my recent posts) certainly leapt to your defense with great speed.In post 2082, Huntress wrote:CCC still hasn't supported his vote on me apart from saying that he thought my first vote on him was suspicious and claiming that my scum reads were all town. He seems to be just trying to find things to support his vote rather than really scumhunting.
Gerry's reason:In post 2082, Huntress wrote:
Another example of not reading before posting? It only took me a few seconds to check back and see Gerry's reason for voting House.In post 2075, CCC wrote:That is to say; his scumread on House depends on his scumread of Gamma.
I requested clarification:In post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.
And my strong scumread on gerryoat followed directly from his answer to that question:In post 2018, CCC wrote:
Why do you sayIn post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.Houseis the fake one?
In post 2075, CCC wrote:In post 2046, gerryoat wrote:
Because I think him and Gamma are the team. His refusal to admit Gamma's scumminess is something I don't think he'd do as town.In post 2018, CCC wrote:
Why do you sayIn post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.Houseis the fake one?In post 2047, gerryoat wrote:
BECAUSE GAMMA IS OBVIOUS MAFIA. IF YOU CANT REALIZE THIS THEN YOU HAVE TO BE MAFIA, YOU CANNOT BE THIS BAD AS TO TOWNREAD HIMIn post 2035, House wrote:
If he was scum he could have easily justified hammering Huntress and had my support tomorrow if he left me alive.In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote:He is dead set on hammering her because she claimed Bullet-proof? Doesnt make sense to me.
Look at Gerry's play dude. He DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ME UNTIL I DERAILED THE GAMMA WAGON AND STARTED PUSHING HUNTRESS.
His scumclaiming is all over the place, and the association with Huntress is so glaringly obvious it hurts.
Ladies and gentlemen, Gerryoat is scum.
Look at what he's saying here; he says he's scumreading House because House is protecting the "obvious mafia" Gamma.
That is to say; his scumread on House depends on his scumread of Gamma. Therefore, he must be scumreading Gamma harder than House. Gamma, who was scumread enough to be almost lynched yesterday; versus House, one of the most Townread players in the game.
Remember the last time we saw this argument in use? Where someone votes for person A, using reasoning which shows they must be scumreading person B even harder than person A?
It formed the cornerstone of House's case on Eager, and now Gerryoat is doing exactly the same thing.
Gerryoat is now the scummiest player in the game.
VOTE: gerryoat-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Hmmm. He has moved suspects a bit, now that you mention it, but Gamma was his most constant scumread before day 3.In post 2150, Huntress wrote:Nope. I asked the right question, which was about your acceptance of House's comment. But comparing him with Grendel, what in House's voting gives you the impression that he would have stayed on a single suspect all Day?
You immediately claimed one of the easiest roles for scum to claim; hard to counterclaim, and with a built-in excuse why you're still alive the next day.In post 2150, Huntress wrote:
What reaction are you referring to here?In post 2085, CCC wrote:Your reaction to the vote on you is looking a lot like scum.
The comments starting with this question:In post 2150, Huntress wrote:Where did I present anything to support the Gamma lynch?
It's a false dilemma. Neither House nor Gamma were the person nightkilled; scum didn't chooseIn post 1988, Huntress wrote:
If both were town, which do you think scum would consider more of a threat: House or Gamma?In post 1751, CCC wrote:I'm giving the "Gamma Is Town" hypothesis a good look because I think that House has a good point; leaving House alive looks a lot like trying to end up getting Gamma lynched, which suggests that it might be a mislynch.betweenthe two of them. But you're presenting it in a way that seems intended to cast doubt on the major reason for townreading Gamma...
Ah. You mean the part where Gerry questions House's non-use of the bodyguard role?
I consider that non-alignment indicative. House is just really arrogant.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
If you're really Town - and, honestly, the fact that you're still posting as Town even after the hammer says aIn post 2151, Huntress wrote:
Nope. It tells you that there is scum on my wagon.In post 2097, House wrote:Manuel/mal, the fact Huntress was at L-1 for so long and unhammered should tell you she's scum.lotin favour of you being Town - then yes, everyone on your wagon will need to be re-considered.
And everyone else, as well.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Hmmmmm. Fair enough. She hasn't actually been confirmed Town yet; and there's no action that can be taken to prevent her flip at this point.In post 2167, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I've seen scum post as town after being hammered before.In post 2166, CCC wrote:
If you're really Town - and, honestly, the fact that you're still posting as Town even after the hammer says aIn post 2151, Huntress wrote:
Nope. It tells you that there is scum on my wagon.In post 2097, House wrote:Manuel/mal, the fact Huntress was at L-1 for so long and unhammered should tell you she's scum.lotin favour of you being Town - then yes, everyone on your wagon will need to be re-considered.
And everyone else, as well.
If she flips red, then Gerryoat is still a strong probability for the final scum - his Huntress vote could have been simple self-preservation (on the basis that if one scum is going to die, the other might as well get some towncred from it). Malpa is the other possibility. (But, interesting note; aside from Huntress herself, the only person not on the Huntress wagon is Manuel. That means that there's some bussing going on, or only to scum, or Manuel is the last scum).
If she flips green, though... then I have to give serious consideration to scum!House.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Final vote counts, every Day, colour coded:
Day 1:
Day 2:In post 1071, Eggman wrote:Not Voting: The_Jester
: gerryoat,Square WorldVictorDeAngelo
Manuel87: CCC,eagerSnake
:eagerSnakeHouse,Huntress, Manuel87,Square World, Gamma Emerald,Grendel
Day 3:In post 1587, Eggman wrote:CCC:Huntress
: gerryoat,VictorDeAngeloGrendel,House, Gamma Emerald, The_Jester
Gamma Emerald: CCC, Manuel87,House(this doesn't really count because hammer so FoS)
: Gamma Emerald (FoS),HouseVictorDeAngelo
(The day 3 count is not showing that I was on gerryoat at the end, not that it makes any substantive difference)In post 2173, Eggman wrote:Not Voting: Manuel87
:HouseHuntress
: gerryoat, Gamma Emerald,HuntressHouse, malpascp-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Some notes:
(a) Manuel and Gamma both voted for our single known scum on Day 1.
(b) Manuel was the target of a strong push by our single known scum, Day 1.
(c) Manuel has never yet been on the vote wagon at the end of day for Town.
(d) Due to (a), (b) and (c), there is still good reason to think that Manuel is Town. It could have been two-way bussing on Day 1, so he's not 100% cleared, but he seems likely Town.
(e) House was Town. Therefore, House did not survive Night 2 by virtue of being scum; scum decided to kill Grendel before House Night 2.
(f) Day 2, House was pushing hard for a lynch on Gamma.
(g) Day 3, House didn't see any reason for his survival is Gamma was scum
(h) Due to (a), (e), (f) and (g), Gamma seems likely Town.
(i) I know that I am Town.
--------------
This leaves only malpascp and gerryoats as the two potential scum. If there are two scum, then, I suspect that this is where they lie.
Looking back over the end-of-day vote counts, I see that gerryoats and malpascp/The_Jester were both on every single lynch of a Town player, but were not on our single lynch of a scum player.
The malpascp/The_Jester slot, despite switching players inbetween, hammered on both days; on both occasions claiming inebriation.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Easy. If the PR is lynched, you can make the above claim and try to dodge a lynch. IfIn post 2196, gerryoat wrote:i'm the only one who defended huntress and when I did, I was going to be lynched for it. please tell me as scum why I would defend PR that much to a point where I was going to be lynched for ityouget lynched, then it makes the PR look even scummier and almost guarantees a mislynch immediately afterwards.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
My strongest scumread is still gerryoat, for the reason put forward yesterday here:
In post 2075, CCC wrote:In post 2046, gerryoat wrote:
Because I think him and Gamma are the team. His refusal to admit Gamma's scumminess is something I don't think he'd do as town.In post 2018, CCC wrote:
Why do you sayIn post 2003, gerryoat wrote:VOTE: House
Don't see the point of there being a BP and a BG. I think House is fake in the two.Houseis the fake one?In post 2047, gerryoat wrote:
BECAUSE GAMMA IS OBVIOUS MAFIA. IF YOU CANT REALIZE THIS THEN YOU HAVE TO BE MAFIA, YOU CANNOT BE THIS BAD AS TO TOWNREAD HIMIn post 2035, House wrote:
If he was scum he could have easily justified hammering Huntress and had my support tomorrow if he left me alive.In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote:He is dead set on hammering her because she claimed Bullet-proof? Doesnt make sense to me.
Look at Gerry's play dude. He DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ME UNTIL I DERAILED THE GAMMA WAGON AND STARTED PUSHING HUNTRESS.
His scumclaiming is all over the place, and the association with Huntress is so glaringly obvious it hurts.
Ladies and gentlemen, Gerryoat is scum.
Look at what he's saying here; he says he's scumreading House because House is protecting the "obvious mafia" Gamma.
That is to say; his scumread on House depends on his scumread of Gamma. Therefore, he must be scumreading Gamma harder than House. Gamma, who was scumread enough to be almost lynched yesterday; versus House, one of the most Townread players in the game.
Remember the last time we saw this argument in use? Where someone votes for person A, using reasoning which shows they must be scumreading person B even harder than person A?
It formed the cornerstone of House's case on Eager, and now Gerryoat is doing exactly the same thing.
Gerryoat is now the scummiest player in the game.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
a) As Mafia, you knew she was Town. Hammering to "prove you weren't on a team with her" would have been counterproductive, andIn post 2209, gerryoat wrote:CCC. as mafia, why would i defend huntress that much. You still havent answered. Why not hammer to prove I wasn't on a team with her? Also if my whole case was on house being mafia, why would i kill him?you knew that.
b) House ended the day still scumreading you, and tends to push through lynches. I can't be sure, but I'm guessing you thought it would be easier to push a mislynch through without him.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Huh. I'd forgotten about that.
Okay, so he was starting to scumread me. And it seems that you were paying more attention to that than I was.
But nothing you've said detracts from my main case. You had a conditional read (you thought House was scumbecauseyou thought Gamma was scum) and then voted for the less likely branch of that conditional; this is exactly what eagerSnake did - and was scumread for - on Day One.
Andyou did it in circumstances where themostlikely branch of the conditional would make an easier lynch.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
No, you're misrepresenting my case.In post 2214, gerryoat wrote:
So i pushed on the person everyone TR, to fight a lynch on someone I thought was town. and that makes me scummy? for trying to stop an eventual mislynch?In post 2212, CCC wrote:Huh. I'd forgotten about that.
Okay, so he was starting to scumread me. And it seems that you were paying more attention to that than I was.
But nothing you've said detracts from my main case. You had a conditional read (you thought House was scumbecauseyou thought Gamma was scum) and then voted for the less likely branch of that conditional; this is exactly what eagerSnake did - and was scumread for - on Day One.
Andyou did it in circumstances where themostlikely branch of the conditional would make an easier lynch.
- Your chain of logic, as presented in the thread, said that House is scumbecauseGamma is scum
- Therefore, logically, your scumread of Gamma had to have been stronger than your scumread of House
- House was more Townread at the time than Gamma
- Despite both of the above, you voted House instead of Gamma
- This isexactlythe same logic that eagerSnake used on day one, which formed the centre of House's case on Eager
In short, you were not pushing your top scumread, in circumstances where there was no Townish reason not to push your top scumread.
Because I think Gamma is Town, while I'm sure that you are Mafia.In post 2215, gerryoat wrote:Gamma also said it was you and mal. but you seem to only focus on me and mal. how come?-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
[quote "In the ghost thread, Grendel"]Also Shame on CCC, this is where he should be preforming at his best, he has pages of data to use. He is supposed to be the analytical, mathematical, skeptical, note taker of the group after all. He is being so complacent when he is in a position to tear up the game... or at least try something outside of VC analysis.[/quote]
My lack of experience was showing; this was the first time I'vesurviveduntil anywhere near LYLO. You're right, Ishouldhave asked how come Manuel was still alive. Aside from that... well, there were a couple of other clues here and there, but I saw nothing scummy enough to counter the day one townread on Manuel, while Jester/malpa's vote record was terrible... so I probably would still have scumread him over Manuel, even if I had asked that question.-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
-
-
CCC Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 967
- Joined: June 25, 2016
Fair enough.In post 2251, Grendel wrote:Yeah, I think was being kinda hard on you. I always have high expectations of players that adopt statistical playsytle, and their ability to narrow the lynch pool, and later Identify scum. Plus I was frustrated at the time.
Indeed he could have. (In fact, during the Night before that final Day, I'd been giving some serious thought to a House/Gamma scumteam. After all, the only reason I'd been townreading Gamma had been House's survival the previous day, and House being scum would have also explained his survival... if he hadn't been the nightkill, then I would have started the day barking upIn post 2251, Grendel wrote:
I'd argue that House could have been set up as last day mislynch. Manuel was universally town read. House was universally town read for a while too, but having two mislynches under his belt, claiming to be PR when three had already flipped, and BoP would have made lylo a real fight for House. If I were scum and both House and Manuel were town, I'd kill manuel because there would be zero chance he'd be mislynched, while House would still be hard to mislynch it could be possible.In post 2249, Gamma Emerald wrote:D1 kill: PR
D2 kill: framing me
d3 kill: PR
If we lynched Gerry and Manuel wasn't dead, THEN questions should have been asked.completelythe wrong tree)
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.