On a serious note, I think scum is in Jar, Matt, Sheep, and Vifam. I can't seem to get a solid read on Akarin.
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:50 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 1291, Vifam wrote:I think JJD is town too I forgot about him
Why are you town reading Jar? Is it for his recent tunneling? If so, what are your thoughts on RC's take on that?
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:54 pm
by nancy
UGH. Are you fucking kidding me.
He was NEVER going to be lynched. I was pushing that fucking wagon for reactions. Whatever.
Grendel is scum to me right now. I don't see him genuinely trying to sort alignments in that whole exchange with RC. JJD is scum and one of LUV/matt are scum. Game is pretty much solved imo.
You're just lashing out here in hopes that people will let up. I don't think any amount of pressure at this point is going to help discren your alignment.
You're just lashing out here in hopes that people will let up. I don't think any amount of pressure at this point is going to help discren your alignment.
VOTE: RC
This is a really sketchy way to push a narrative.
I was just saying how I feel. Why do you feel like I'm not telling the full story?
In post 1283, mattblackguy wrote:There's only one scum in [Keyser,Jar,Sheep], and I don't think it's Keyser, but I'm not confident enough to give a full Town read so I'm keeping him here just in case.
Why only 1 scum in {Keyser, JJD, Sheep}?
Vifam, why is it that you can't be lynched exactly?
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2017 1:26 pm
by Keyser Söze
Can we please stop the '1 in 3 are scum', '2 in 5 are scum' theories.
I'd prefer to see a scum flip before ruling out partners.
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2017 1:32 pm
by RadiantCowbells
Fuck you keyser you're terrible at this game.
I can confirm, with absolute certainty, that there are
In post 114, Rautherdir wrote:I have no idea what is happening but I guess it's RVS so I'll just vote someone.
VOTE: Akarin
Scummy post
No, your reply is the actually definition of scummy. Where's your vote? Where are the attempts to dig? Do you not care why he thinks Gerry is scum and RC is town?
More of LUV scum reading hard on JarJar. Let's see the development of LUV vs JarJar through the game. No vote yet!
In post 174, Keyser Söze wrote:Not convinced by Rauth so far. I want to see him upset an active player. Feels like he's trying to play a safe game. Once I see his teeth I may get a better look inside his soul.
Why would seeing him purposely upset active players make you feel better about his alignment?
Upset as in engage in an interaction that demands him to reason out a conflict of reads / ideas / beliefs. I want to see blood.
Not "upset" as in 'your breath stinks of penis'.
I just don't understand why you associate engaging with upset. I think him being himself has been enough so far.
I don't know why LUV was grilling me on this. I had a reason of concern on Rauth. (Rauth has just revealed he was being closed and scummy on purpose so it explains his behaviour perfectly now). I don't know why LUV had to step in and defend Rauth.
In post 114, Rautherdir wrote:I have no idea what is happening but I guess it's RVS so I'll just vote someone.
VOTE: Akarin
Scummy post
No, your reply is the actually definition of scummy. Where's your vote?
I pointed out his post was scummy. That doesn't mean I automatically vote him. I pointed out other scummy posts as well.
Where are the attempts to dig?
What else can I really say about that post? I explained to him why I thought it was scummy.
Do you not care why he thinks Gerry is scum and RC is town?
Sure I care.
Well my thing is, why? Just saying it's scummy without backing it up is pointless and arguably will help him in the long run if he's scum. He'll know that whatever he did, said, or how he said something isn't ok and possibly will be able to adjust and blend in better.
I really don't like last part of this reply. Does it sound sarcastic to anyone else?
In post 606, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I just don't understand why you associate engaging with upset. I think him being himself has been enough so far.
"Engaging" does not = "upsetting". But it is one part of interactions I like to look at.
Part of my concern I am sure you should be able to relate to. You personally asked Rautherdir: "Are you usually this cautious?".
There is one type of mafia playing style I have encountered that Rautherdir has exhibited. Thus, I want to drill down on what he actually is posting (does he believe any of it? is he willing to broadcast those beliefs to everyone? is he willing to cause conflict in order to push his scum-reads?).
"I think him being himself has been enough so far."
- it sounds like you currenty town-read Rautherdir so I'd expect for that to be your default position. Do you have a problem with me wanting more from Rautherdir in order to 'enhance' my read of him?
Yes I currently town read him and I think I do. I'm not completely sure yet because I haven't had a chance to mull it over deeply but from your original request, it seems like you want him to purposely go out of character.
