Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 4:54 am
A little irritated. I don't think it's indicative of his alignment, but there wasn't really any need to randomly toss it out there.
In post 407, TobyLoby wrote:@Tiershift,
In post 359, TierShift wrote:I don't like this post and I'll research you now.
What about Gamr's post don't you like?
In post 412, Cho wrote:Also, my vote on T S O was premature and fueled by illogical desires. I think he's town.
VOTE: davesaz
This is a temporary OMGUS vote, in lieu of a solid scumread to focus on at the moment. I'm a bit disconnected from this game.
In post 726, T S O wrote:Are you feeling something I'm not, Thor?
In post 709, Thor665 wrote:Why did you wait to claim to be in a neighborhood till this moment?
In post 709, Thor665 wrote:I have said both of these things before and was even debating it with Goodmorning - why didn't you hop in on that?
In post 725, T S O wrote:A little irritated
In post 728, Thor665 wrote:In post 726, T S O wrote:Are you feeling something I'm not, Thor?
Well, I'm not irritated by it in any way at all so - yes, I must be feeling something you're not.
I'm on open record that Neighbors are one of the most generically useless roles in existence - I could honestly not care less about whether we full reveal them or not.
In post 729, Nero Cain wrote:Why should I have previously claimed I was in a hood? I'm back now and saw some hood talk so yeah.
In post 730, T S O wrote:Meh.
I just got the feeling he expected people to praise the revealing of it or something.
In post 425, Garmr wrote:In post 424, Aneninen wrote:@Gammrnmhrm
"Well if the only thing that strikes me are scum points thenwhy should I think his town?"– You don't have to. But, frankly is he your strongest scumread now?
"You just made my point even stronger. Dodging subjects is town how?"– No, I don't like that either. I just don't understand why you mentioned the Csareo-subject. You could have talked about anything else too.
1.Yes he is
2.Because I was asked about my thoughts at the time or at least I took it that way and that was the most relevant subject at the time. The cho subject was still ongoing (still kinda is) and not at it's peak.
In post 459, Thor665 wrote:In post 458, Izariael wrote:You can hope all you like, but I was srs. Nothing wrong with committing to a null.
Except trying to take credit for it while bashing someone offering mild alignment leans as weak - then there IS a problem with committing to it.
I COMMIT TO THIS NULL READ...by the way, this other guy isn't getting behind his town adn scum reads other than to say he "feels" this way about them. That's the scummiest thing in this thread!
I would be okay lynching Izariael now.
In post 464, Boonskiies wrote:Anyhoosies, I don't like that Cho keeps making the mafia claim joke, (he did it in neighborhood along with doing it on his first post). It looks like a thing mafia might do to seem like a joke, and make people go, "Oh lookie here, they are making a joke, HAHAHAHA, THAT'S FUNNY! He can't really be scum!" And that's scummy. Also, he is making up reasons for why would I as scum scenarios, like outing the neighborhood. Seems planned. YAWWWWW.
Vote: Cho
In post 734, TierShift wrote:Are you serious? Why is iza's behaviour scummy? (As in, why are scum nore likely to do it than town, don't give a dumb answer)
In post 486, Egg wrote:Tier to TSO wrote:Why did you feel the need to defend the tell dave had on you?
Why shouldn't he? Also, it seems weird that you would shoot down the anger town tell as easy to fake only to call it null when questioned further on it. And when I ISO'd you for TSO mentions, I found a lot of mentions of him, but couldn't tell what your actual read on him was until I saw your vote on him. Everything from you about TSO seems off to me.
Also, can you explain this:
Tier wrote:Tobyloby makes me feel extremely comfortable and I have the feeling I know her. Her pushes are coherent and thoroughly understandable. I'm wanting her to be town.
It seems like a weird thing to say.
In post 735, Thor665 wrote:In post 734, TierShift wrote:Are you serious? Why is iza's behaviour scummy? (As in, why are scum nore likely to do it than town, don't give a dumb answer)
The only reason that unexplained reads are scummy is because they are easily changeable.
That is the core definition of a null read as well.
I will agree that Izzy is making big noise about how well explained his null read was - but it doesn't change what a null read is nor does it change the only issue with unexplained reads.
Therefore, he's doing something, calling it townish, and complaining that someone is doing something different and calling it scummy - while blind to the fact that it is the same type of pro-scum play.
Making him either town who is dangerous to have in the game due to inability to read below the surface or scum.
Both making him a viable lynch option to me.
What's your issue with my stance?
Don't give a dumb answer.
In post 736, Nero Cain wrote:In post 733, Thor665 wrote:Why?
*meh* musta not noticed or cared.
Who are you in a hood with?
In post 738, TierShift wrote:Izzy looks like he believes in that strongly felt nullreads are more of a commitment than soft townreads, he really does. I was wondering why you didn't see that and instead focused on the sense he wasn't making and calling him scummy over it.
In post 743, TierShift wrote:You seem to be addressing me as though I've been Smurfing on you, which I haven't. What's up with the attitude?
In post 743, TierShift wrote:What gm whine?
In post 742, Thor665 wrote:because your issue is that I didn't immediately read him as town...is that right?
In post 744, Thor665 wrote:Hint: I am scumhunting you.
In post 723, Izariael wrote:
But the time for being up-front and pro-active about neighborhood composition is long past. Throwing it out there now is a formality more than anything, since everyone is aware that multiple neighborhoods are in play. It might be pro-town, but I would expect scum to follow suit as well because it would be blatantly scummy not to.
In post 730, T S O wrote:
Meh.
I just got the feeling he expected people to praise the revealing of it or something.
In post 734, TierShift wrote:In post 425, Garmr wrote:In post 424, Aneninen wrote:@Gammrnmhrm
"Well if the only thing that strikes me are scum points thenwhy should I think his town?"– You don't have to. But, frankly is he your strongest scumread now?
"You just made my point even stronger. Dodging subjects is town how?"– No, I don't like that either. I just don't understand why you mentioned the Csareo-subject. You could have talked about anything else too.
1.Yes he is
2.Because I was asked about my thoughts at the time or at least I took it that way and that was the most relevant subject at the time. The cho subject was still ongoing (still kinda is) and not at it's peak.
This is lame, super lame. The question is useless and the answer is made in a too serious manner. Marking as possible buddy tell for later.
In post 745, Thor665 wrote:In post 742, Thor665 wrote:because your issue is that I didn't immediately read him as town...is that right?
@Tiershift