If that's the case then we're lynching me.In post 1824, RadiantCowbells wrote:We're lynching Fro99er or LUV.
LUV was the counterwagon to JarJar. 100% guaranteed.
If that's the case then we're lynching me.In post 1824, RadiantCowbells wrote:We're lynching Fro99er or LUV.
LUV had ZERO reason to make this post as scum unless we are scumbuddies.
This is also why LUV is town. You'll see after I flip.In post 1664, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:@Keyser: I think I already went over why I'm scum reading Matt but if I haven't I'll do so again. I found a lot of his play early on forced and felt like he was fence sitting. He's also recently been calling for my head but I don't think he's made any attempt to sort me or even has said why he's scum reading me.
I am scum reading Sheep mainly because of his push on the Transcend slot and PoE.
I didn't get why he was so focused on Transcend during D2 and it sort of pinged me because nothing really stood out to me from Transcend's play. When I looked back at their interactions on D1, all I saw was him explaining to Transcend in a sort of condescending tone about why there was a wagon on Grendel and him confirming who he is to Transcend. The latter came off more snobbish and patronizing then the former. It read like he was projecting a level of importance that he felt he rightfully earned at that point of the game which was very odd. This lead me to believe throughout my reread that there will be various play style and personality clashes between the two and that a lot of what they'll be scum reading each other for will be overblown.
At the start of D2, he voted Transcend and then I believe states he voted for him because of effort and his suspect voting pattern on D1. Effort is NAI. The second point however is a valid point but if you take a look back on D1, I believe Transcend voted for at least 4-5 different people before voting for Gerry according to my notes. What Sheep fails to acknowledge is that lot of those votes where in RVS and that scum would prefer not to bring that much attention themselves by voting like it's going out of style.
Sheep later on questions Transcend about his take on the Gerry and Grendel's wagons but does it in such a way that comes off like he's trying to show others that Transcend is stating his theories as fact. Now I have no idea why Transcend really didn't answer these questions from Sheep but his attitude seemed carefree and just genuine. I think scum would be more alert, more on guard, and try to look as pro-town as possible. Transcend did the exact opposite and while it could've been just an act, I find the simplest explanation always the most probable.
Here we are now and he's pushing nancy over her claiming immediately on replacement and only looking at the vote counts. Which is weird but doesn't make her scum. The latter however is a very bad angle to push in my opinion. Various players on this site put a lot of stock into VCA and nancy may just be one of them. Wouldn't surprise me to be honest since I've heard a lot of good things about her play. He's essentially scum reading her for play style rather than looking for the motivation of her actions.
--
@Mod: I'll be v/LA till the 16th. Valentines Day.
V/LA noted
Ok, and in the case where LUV isn't a counterwagon then he and I are scum together. Period.In post 1829, nancy wrote:There were 2 potential counterwagons to JJD and I was one of them.
And because Uzi and I HAVE to be aligned together, it shows we're both town. I guess I could be scum and Uzi town, but Uzi is conftown. He was a D2 counterwagon (possibly Nancy was too, but I'm 100% positive on Uzi).In post 1832, Keyser Söze wrote:If I go back to the lynch wagon, if I remove town/RC/JarJar that leaves:
Grendel, Lil Uzi Vert, Nancy, frogger
I'm fine with people lynching me. It will help town actually win for me to die so RC can get out of his wormhole.In post 1835, Keyser Söze wrote:Stop saying 'sacrifice you' Frogger, that will only fuel people to want to lynch you
sacrificing yourself for the good of town is a noble and worthy thing. I am happy to do so.In post 1835, Keyser Söze wrote:Stop saying 'sacrifice you' Frogger, that will only fuel people to want to lynch you
In post 1805, Fro99er wrote:If Matt is scum, this basically rules Grendel out as Matt and Jar's partner.In post 890, Grendel wrote:Also your Jar jar read. You seemed sure he was scum yesterday, but now its like he is the shining hero who is defeating evil RC for you. Like you reads coming into today seem to have flipped completely.
This is EXACTLY what I found.
From your perspective, matt should be confscum to you. Uzi is conftown for the reasons I explained.In post 1841, Keyser Söze wrote:I don't like frogger lining up my lynch after a matt-town flip but I will allow it as I am not a tier 1 t/read.
unless he and I are scum together, but you, Keyser, ruled out myself and Uzi as scum together because we are in the group of 4 where there can only be 1 scum per VCA. And there was zero reason for a scum uzi to back off of a town me.In post 1844, Fro99er wrote:Uzi is conftown for the reasons I explained.
I prefer us lynching someone we naturally scum read.In post 1839, Fro99er wrote:sacrificing yourself for the good of town is a noble and worthy thing. I am happy to do so.In post 1835, Keyser Söze wrote:Stop saying 'sacrifice you' Frogger, that will only fuel people to want to lynch you
It's not a logical fallacy. Lynching me will be good for town so we can get on with lynching MBG then SheepIn post 1846, Keyser Söze wrote:You presenting us this 1 for 1 trade is a logical fallacy. It can be used as both town or scum.
EBWOPIn post 1845, Fro99er wrote:unless he and I are scum together, but you, Keyser, ruled out myself and Uzi as scum together because we are in the group of 4 where there can only beIn post 1844, Fro99er wrote:Uzi is conftown for the reasons I explained.a maximum of1 scum per VCA. And there was zero reason for a scum uzi to back off of a town me.
Hence Uzi is conftown.