Max: 3 (Adele, Fiasco, Xdaamno)
Sammich: 2 (ryan, SomeStrangeSimenon)
Fiasco: 1 (Max)
kabenon007: 1 (WaterboyWaldo)
PookyTheMagicalBear: 1 (Thorned Rose)
WaterboyWaldo: 1 (kabenon007)
Did anyone notice it was the first day and my vote was a random one for discussion and THANK YOU for starting a little discussion about you. Why so jumpy about one vote?Sammich wrote:It's rly awkward that ryan voted me without any explanation.
Didn't anyone notice that?
But why share that info anyway? When it might somehow damage the town, discretion being the better part of valour and all?Max wrote:For people who do not understand semi-random votes heres a small explanation, Firstly you use a reason that is not true for example claiming that they told you they were scum.
It was a random vote,
Definition of Random:
A process where the outcome is not decided by normal decisions and is instead, for example, by the roll of a dice. See Chance
WaterboyWaldo wrote:Adele is confusing me.I don't have a problem with her FOSing somebody instead of voting them, but this is a weak argument. She's worried that her suspicions are there for everyone to see? That's what happens when you FOS somebody too. Heck, just stating your suspicions allows people to see them. This is a poor explanation for her lack of vote.adele wrote:when you vote your suspicions are right there for everyone to see, and that might bite you in the ass later when you contradict yourself out of convenience.
Did I miss the portion of the program that stated this was a "GAME?" Settle down there texSammich wrote:THEN SAY IT WAS A RANDOM VOTE.ryan wrote:Did anyone notice it was the first day and my vote was a random one for discussion and THANK YOU for starting a little discussion about you. Why so jumpy about one vote?
ASDF;
That's not the point; the point is he could have said it when people called him on the statement.Adele wrote:That's why waterboywaldo didn't say in the post when he was kidding around that he was just kidding around.
...Fiasco wrote:Everyone, do you think Adele's "let's all say whether we have the same role" suggestion was scummy?
That one? Where I state it's an IDEA, that it might beAdele wrote:Hmm. An idea occurs, a precipitate to a mass roleclaim down the line; if everyone stated now whether their role is the same as first time around. May be useful for catching folk in lies down the line... may be unutterably stupid. Thoughts?