Fiasco: 2 (Max, SomeStrangeSimenon)
Max: 2 (Fiasco, Xdaamno)
kabenon007: 1 (WaterboyWaldo)
PookyTheMagicalBear: 1 (Thorned Rose)
Sammich: 1 (ryan)
WaterboyWaldo: 1 (kabenon007)
This doesn't read to me as "yeah let's definately kill max today, yeah?"WaterboyWaldo wrote:I am not voting at random; I believe Max to be acting suspicious. Also, the deadline isn't THAT short. It's pretty much a whole week. We have plenty of time to kill him.
Waldo wrote:Well, I did have the day planned around lynching Max. At least, until I became more suspicious of you.
A direct, and I mean direct as direct can be, contradiction. Within like four posts!Waldo wrote:I didn't have the day planned around killing specifically Max
Hm. You do realise that full second statement was:kabenon007 wrote:Waldo wrote:Well, I did have the day planned around lynching Max. At least, until I became more suspicious of you.A direct, and I mean direct as direct can be, contradiction. Within like four posts!Waldo wrote:I didn't have the day planned around killing specifically Max
, and therefore you took it out of context, and there's no contradiction at all...?Waldo wrote:I didn't have the day planned around killing specifically Max, but rather the most suspicious person, who just happened to be Max at the time.
More '~', less ''SomeStrangeSimenon wrote:I really don't like this:1. He's scared of ryan's vote, but awkward is a "safety word".Sammich wrote:It's rly awkward that ryan voted me without any explanation.
Didn't anyone notice that?
2. The question is a lot less assertive than it should be at this stage.
Unvote
Vote Sammich
Right. And when both you and kab7 started questioning me, I respondedFiasco wrote:Not sure I buy the "it was meant as humor". If people attacked me for saying something I didn't really mean, I'd make that clear immediately.
Apparently it wasn't clear enough, as I'm still explaining myself a full page later.Well, I did have the day planned around lynching Max. At least, until I became more suspicious of [kab7].
I don't have a problem with her FOSing somebody instead of voting them, but this is a weak argument. She's worried that her suspicions are there for everyone to see? That's what happens when you FOS somebody too. Heck, just stating your suspicions allows people to see them. This is a poor explanation for her lack of vote.adele wrote:when you vote your suspicions are right there for everyone to see, and that might bite you in the ass later when you contradict yourself out of convenience.
lessXdaamno wrote:More '~', less ''SomeStrangeSimenon wrote:I really don't like this:1. He's scared of ryan's vote, but awkward is a "safety word".Sammich wrote:It's rly awkward that ryan voted me without any explanation.
Didn't anyone notice that?
2. The question is a lot less assertive than it should be at this stage.
Unvote
Vote Sammich
It's still a contradiction. If he meant whoever was most suspicious, why didn't he say that instead of saying he was focusing on Max? Everyone targets who they think is most suspicious!Xdaamno wrote:Hm. You do realise that full second statement was:and therefore you took it out of context, and there's no contradiction at all...?Waldo wrote:I didn't have the day planned around killing specifically Max, but rather the most suspicious person, who just happened to be Max at the time.
Because I was screwing around and making....brace yourself.... a joke!If he meant whoever was most suspicious, why didn't he say that instead of saying he was focusing on Max?
See post 117.why did he wait to post that it was a joke? Why didn't he say it right away when it came under suspicion?