tee-hee
In post 7, AxleGreaser wrote:
Speaking of Stalking...
Keyser whats your
general
opinion of fake claiming?
I know people got onto the emphasis he put on 'general' fake claiming. If somebody asked me that I'd give them the textbook answer, and I have to admit Im not sure wht he hoped to gain from it. Maybe he thought that Keysor can appreicate explicit detail and would have produced a short wiki article worth of theory?
Nothing to write home about, but likely part of axle's personality.
9 The whole thing looks pointless to me. It still doesnt tell what he hoped to learn. And don't tell me he hoped to learn if Keysor was more opposed to them. Possibly written off as asking a detail-oriented poster about a topic, but I dont see the need to so early.
51 He asks why people are taking 7 as alignment indicative. For a person who claims to be used to dealing with 'the masses' (my term) and seems to recognize that he is often misunderstood he's sure not interested in either explaining himself so they can understand it or simply exercising proper judgement. It was a rather random question asked for unknown reasons early in the game. RQS? Maybe possible, however most RQSers I know tend to ask several questions or ask several people. Seems inefficient at the least.
Again, RQS?
If I had caught this early enough I would have followed up on it. As it sits its evidence he wasnt engaging in RVS proper or he isnt opposed to it.
@Keysor: What is your read on Axle again?
Dont call it stalking; just call it reading other games out of interest or meta-ing people.
BUT WHY WAS IT A QUESTION YOU CHOSE TO ASK IN RVS? The motivation for doing such a dubious thing is in question.
I'm having a hard time seperating the wheat from the chaff with Axle. I guess I should 'stalk' him a little . . .
Wonder if this happened . . .
It kind of did, in
118. He gave a decent assessment of him, and seems to have read up on the game in question. Which I frank;ly dont know if he would be as scum.
In post 116, AxleGreaser wrote:meme lords like pro.
reasons like buzz saw.
As scum: has no scum meta.
As town: while hes on the money, with some observations about intent etc(33), like hes a seasoned player from elsewhere that has come here. (hence scary the first time he rolls scum), I also see signs hes relatively new to the game as a whole(but that is more a feeling).
As a player that reasons like buzz saw, when he rolls scum he may be scary. Maybe not the first time he does, but before long.
his is good stuff. I cant call it town stuff, but its a good assessment of Keysor.
Im losing interest and Id have to committ myself to a metadive of Axle, but
282 felt weird, like a restating of my posts which he had just quoted. My initial impression is that they went through a translator into 'his language', so I thought maybe he was trying to assess me or that I was hereto misunderstood or even trying to sympathize with me. *shrugs*
288 is his meta on me. The gist seems to be that Im ornery and that I ignore 'bystanders' to attack 'insiders'. Actually the impression I got was that he compared me to scholars debating in a forum while bystanders occassionally pipped up to incorrectly add their 2 cents and get ignored. I prefer the idea of being a 'civilized barbarian'
. Analogies aside, its clear he used meta information and apparently read enough to pick out highlights.
Effort is not alignment indicative, but its easy to think it is.
I think one of the largest problems Im having here is determining his motivation. Why is he doing what he does?
Did he do the above, or was what he did sufficient? If he didnt do it because he didnt have to I cant call that outright scummy because its always optimal to do the least amount of effeort required to reach your goals.
Other posts like 327 have some info, but meh . . .
412 is a push on Ras, and thats something we can contrast him to later. So Im okay with it even if I thinks its mostly based on nothing strong.
He confuses me with his take on droog in 438. Did it not suffice to say that Droog was nullreading me, voting me, and then defending me by using AIs posts about me to challenge AI?
I think he's pushing to hard on Ras for unvoting in RVS. Its a compliment to a full case, but hardly strong enough to be the case by itself.
