Thread Title wrote:Short and Sweet Mafia - Night 1
*cough*
Also, I think skipping the random voting stage would obviously be the ost beneficial... but then we have nothing to go on.
Something of a joke, something of the truth -- assume I am town. If people assumed that I was town and made decent reads, I would have won like 75% of my pro-town games instead of 0%. I am town here.
You could argue it isGuardian wrote:We need to self deadline here. I recommend a 7 page 3 week deadline for day one, by guesstimation. Assuming we use all reasonable days, this setup isn't weird besides the post restrictions, there is no vig/sk/third faction, and that we get to lylo and then lynch scum from then on out, I would guess that we are in store for something like four or five days.
You couldn't elaborate any more than this?trumpezia wrote: The last point of Guardian's bulleted list gives me slight scummy vibes, but all the rest of his post leads me to believe him.
... I made a joke, pointed out a *cough* mod error and them commented on the matter at hand. You are suggesting I wastrumpezia wrote: I would like to point out that Xdaamno's post was rather content-less too, well I agree that random voting without content is bad, but if you are making a post anyway, you might as well stick in a random vote as well. In general, I feel Xdaamno was being a little bit too careful in his first post, which seemed scummy, but his second post feels much more townish.
Classic case of pretending to be the helpful guy. I thought it was be quite obvious we take a mafia game seriously.trumpezia wrote: In general, I feel that I agree that we should not spam, nor random-vote, and we should take the theme of the game rather seriously.
I never questioned your vote. I simply questioned your reasoning on your own defence.Guardian wrote: Why is it scummy when he does it but townlike when I do it?
Despite making a post you mostly agreed with, I have a heightened suspiscion? AndGuardian wrote: Xdaamno - Some inconsistencies...
VitaminR wrote: I don't like Xdaamno's trumpezia vote. I fail to see why trumpezia is scummy for pointing out that spamming isn't helpful in this game, especially considering how many others have done the same.
VitaminR wrote: I thought your first post was careful too (the only thing you really contributed was that we should skip the random vote stage, seems a very safe contribution). FOS: Xdaamno
Guardian wrote:You said my post was mostly pro-town, and liked my game theory. Trump agreed with the same game theory, now it is scummy to do so?Xdaamno wrote:I never questioned your vote. I simply questioned your reasoning on your own defence.Guardian wrote: Why is it scummy when he does it but townlike when I do it?
Guardian, I don't know what world you live in, but I don't scumhunt based on what the aim of people's arguments are. Scum players are often able to replicate a pro-town players views, so it's moot. I look for the way people say it, and the force they say it with. I didn't simply vote trumpezia based on 'You're Wrong'.
I disagreed with 3 things -- your inconsistent FOS of me, you finding trumpieza scummy and me not, and you asking for more elaboration on trumpieza's part when I didn't see a need for any. That is hardly "mostly agreeing".Xdaamno wrote:Despite making a post you mostly agreed with, I have a heightened suspiscion? AndGuardian wrote: Xdaamno - Some inconsistencies...onlybecause I was in a good mood at the time of writing my last post? If you wish to confirm my aggresive behaviour as universal, ther'll be evidence in a few other of my games where I made aggresive and usually logical posts at the same time.
I know you're supposed to find contradictions and whatnot, butreally. What exactly are you proposing? If you wish for me to change it to 'partly agreeing with', that's no big deal, ya know?
You seemed to miss my sarcasm. I was pointing out how ridiculous it is to 'pedantacize', as it were, my wording.Guardian wrote: How about instead of "mostly agreeing with" you wrote "mostly NOT agreeing with"? That would have been more accurate. You were making it seem like except for a little bit of your argument I was with you, whereas in reality I didn't like a lot of what you were saying.
CompletelyGuardian wrote: Your EBWOP is very anti-town, for the record. Bad taste in my mouth.
You may be right, but I feel his post was a little too spontaneous to be thinking about it in that depth at the time.Coron wrote: posts are a town resource, sure everyone loses when they are gone, but only the town hurts when they start getting rationed.
Also, I agree with this. As hypocritical as it may seem, I'll be posting a lot more from now on and I feel we should start stamping down on lurking from this point, because if we don't, we're almost certainly dead.MoS wrote: I have no reason to believe he is town, and I am not going to contribute to the stalling that people are causing under the pretense of waiting for enough posts to pass so that they are not "spamming". That's a bullshit excuse that the mafia have used to consume nearly 1/3 of our game time.
OSHIRishi wrote:Umm. Skruffs isn't in this game. Sorry to keep wasting posts, but time is more important than posts right now, and this needed to be said.Xdaamno wrote:Yes, but that's an 'if'. I guess I can't prove what you were thinking of at the time, so nevermind/this is a waste of posts.
Unvote Vote: Skruffsif I haven't done so already, putting my money where my mouth is.
I 100% agree with this post, save the bit where you suggest Vigging/Lynching me. Looking at everyone so far, I can't see much better.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Unvote, Vote: Kinetic
I actually feel that CTD and VitaminR always voting with what are now confirmed protown players is a point in their favor, because their suspicions were the same as a protown player's suspicions.
Lynch Kinetic
Vig VitaminR
I'll investigate CTD, Xdaamno, or Guardian
I would be willing to lynch/vig any combination of Kinetic, VitaminR, and Xdaamno. I could see them all as scum, but for very different reasons.
Though I hate to use the excuse, read any of my games, it's my playstyle (as scum or town, therefore it's null).Kinetic wrote: Xdaamno is very interesting. If you look in the vote counts, he's barely moved at all. I don't think at this time he is a good lynch choice, but for a vig choice he might not be too bad.
That's complete BS because scum don't hold grudges. They'd kill a RBer either way, if they knew their identify.Guardian wrote: Shadow-lover/lurker, ABR killed because he was RBer of Xdaamno(?), not much interactions with dead scum.
BecauseRishi wrote: Great idea. I'll vig myself.
Is that supposed to be insulting? I'm making an effort, but it's hard to memorize who's been killed in a load of games. Plus, that's not 100% confirmed. You could be a SK for all I know.Rishi wrote: There's only one scum left. It is really obvious that you're not paying attention to a damn thing going on in this game.
for a post that he didn't even point out any scum tells in is absurd.Rishi wrote: I was somewhat borderline before, but I'll fully for this lynch now.
No, I'm obviously playing this off the top of my head. If I was scum, do you think I'd expect you to go along with that?Guardian wrote: Xdaamno requesting lynching the 100% proven and not counter claimed NK-er (which all logic indicates is a vig -- he DIDN'T kill night 0) makes me even more comfortable with my vote.