I was mainly referring to his comment about random posting. He said
which seems much to reserved to me, it seems that he was kind of taking a stance in both directions, (even though the statement that we ought to skip random voting was rather weak to begin with)Also, I think skipping the random voting stage would obviously be the ost beneficial... but then we have nothing to go on.
To Guardian who asked me to clarify why I thought Xdaamno's second post was more towny:
Well, to be honest, it was mostly because he hold the same reservations about some lines of your argument as I did; and it seemed like he was genuinely analyzing your post assuming neither you innocens nor your guilt, (I believe that whilst mafia and town both try to find flaws in the others' arguments, mafia will most likely know that the person making the argument is innocent, and it tends to show through as more nit-picking rather than thinking about what play would be better for the town). Xdaamno seemed to do the latter.
Well, to me my statement wasn't really intending to be grasping, it was a summary of my feelings that I agree with Guardian about posting as condensed as possible, and specifically, the part about takeing the theme rather seriously was meant to disgree with Sarcastro's "I think some people are going a bit overboard with the theme.".Xdaamno wrote:Classic case of pretending to be the helpful guy. I thought it was be quite obvious we take a mafia game seriously.trumpezia wrote: In general, I feel that I agree that we should not spam, nor random-vote, and we should take the theme of the game rather seriously.
Grasping; or, more specifically, pretending to be helpful.
Xdaamno, you say that I was posting only for the sake of agreeing with everyone else, well first of all I was disagreeing with Sarcastro, secondly, would it have been less scummy if I made a post without saying a word about my opinion regarding the random voting / spamming?
To Guardian re: whether we should set ourselves a deadline:
Well, I just don't think that a firm deadline, which we all make public in the thread are good. I think we should get more lynch-happy as the day progresses; but everyone may decide for themselves how mucher quicker they are going to get lynch-happy. In the end, I think the problem will solve itself without need for any organised and firm deadlining. I might reconsider this later if I think day 1 has progressed too long (but I won't tell you what I think is too long)
Albert B. Rampage's vote was more clear-cut bandwagoning I think, hence why I think he is more scummy; He seemed to be throwing a vote in, advocating a quick lynch, and then hiding behind your reasoning, trying to make it sound like you wanted Sarcastro quickly lynched.Guardian wrote: Why do you find people scummy for voting Sarcastro if you think he is only middle of the road? The quickness of it only? Do you think they had valid reasons for finding him suspicious?
As for CTD, I said about Sarcastro's post was really too scummy to be scummy, and I think a town would have more reservations about Sarcastro than to throw a vote on that quickly.
VitaminR says he is inclined to see Albert as town because of the latter throwing his vote around; while I can see where VitaminR is coming from, I think there is a lot of danger of WIFOM here, but I tihnk in the end it is still beneficial for the town if we consider it scummy to vote without reason. (If everyone voted without justification, we would get nowhere fast.) Albert even admits to not justify his vote; to me, this seems like scum trying to save his skin (by hinting that he was only prodding for reactions) after realising that the previous attempt at bandwagoning had failed.
So, in short I'm still happy with my Albert vote.
Mastermind of Sin is very much ignoring the calls for him to stop spamming, I think. I would like to consider him a little more scummy.
Could you clarify what you are referring to by this? Maybe I'm being thick, but I can make neither head nor tail of this.Xdaamno wrote:I never questioned your vote. I simply questioned your reasoning on your own defence.Guardian wrote: Why is it scummy when he does it but townlike when I do it?
I very much like VitaminR's last posts. He and Guardian seem to be questioning everyone, genuinely trying to find scum.
Xdaamno seems to be a little defensive, (it is only me who thinks his vote on me smells OMGUS?), so he is gaining a little more scumminess in my book.
Pooky's posts are still too opaque for me, I think he always plays like this.
Albert (3): MoS, Pooky, trumpezia
Pooky (1): Guardian
Guardian (1): Sarcastro
trumpezia (1): Xdaamno
11 living, 6 to lynch