In post 2086, Nobody Special wrote:goodmorning: can I get a quick recap on why you aren't interested in lynching viking?
I find that his claim is plausible and am holding off on deciding whether I believe it or not til I ISO him. I'm not going to want to lynch him if I decide I believe it.
In post 2093, dragonspawn wrote:In post 2080, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I have a burning question for this town.
Let's pretend for a moment that we accept the premise that you're told when you're protected.
If scum intended to nightkill viking, as he claims, why did they also roleblock him?
it's precisely this that makes his claim unlikely.
not only that to believe his claim we have to either accept three parties attacking one another last night or the idea that we have a doctor that gets killed in place or the target. I've never heard or a doc like that.
There is such a thing but it would flip "Bodyguard."
Why do you think it's unlikely that 2 hypothetical scumteams would gun for/block a claimed investigative in the same night?
In post 2095, SilverWolf wrote:vk's claim:
-requires 3 kill attempts last night
-required that someone tried to kill him and someone else tried to RB him
-requires he was told if he was protected
-required he was told that someone tried to kill him.
@Nobody Special/Wake or anyone who has modded Large Normals
Is this a possibility at all?
I've modded a Large Normal and it makes me sad that I've been left out here.
It's possible.
Your first two points are very possible.
Second two unlikely but possible.
@Wake: ABR has retracted his own claim. He meant that he himself is VT, not Tracker as he said before. Nobody scumreads him because he doesn't like VT. If they scumread him for anything involving the phrase "VT" it is his Tracker retraction.
p-edit: WW are totally possible, see masquerade etc