In post 1121, KatieB wrote: In post 1104, llll wrote:Neither KatieB nor sthar appear to have any other games going on,
The logical leap here is astounding. I am alive in other games.
Provide a link, then. This is KatieB's only game. Sthar8 has not been posting in other games. I have no way of knowing your other alts, which is not my decision and therefore not something you have any right to blame me for.
KatieB wrote: In post 1073, llll wrote: are a one line incomprehensible insult about short pants
having just admitted that you didn't understand it, what makes you think it's an insult?
I thought you meant it as an insult. I suppose I could be wrong - maybe it's one of those non sequiturs you write when you see people mistrusting you (
in a mafia game!
) that you say frustrate you so much.
KatieB wrote:I have failed in my objective of being polite
maybe
three times in this thread. Have you meta'd my main?
If you fail multiple times at being polite, then maybe you should not describe yourself as polite. I have not read your past games - that's too much effort for a game where other players write stuff like "This might help restore some of my motivation for the game." I did read your posts in the St. Nick's thread while I was checking if you were playing in other games, and I liked you a lot more in that thread.
KatieB wrote: Let's be clear: I don't like you. I find it hard to address you without using profanity. As a result, I care very little about how you feel about me.
I already thought you didn't like me despite your alleged politeness, so I am not about to go off and
buy a pillow to cry into.
@Aeronaut
I think you're reading way too aggressively into Pacman's post.
Pacman's "Monkey gets close to lynch for the first time here but then both Anen and llll unvote" does not deserve
Aeronaut's "Are you asserting that they are scum because they unvoted? Because one flipped town, and you said llll was town like three sentences ago."
Pacman did not assert Aneninen or llll is scum. I think he was just commenting on the events that transpired, instead of judging them. You also say that Pacman called me "certain scum" later on, but I did not notice that.
I think our different responses may stem, at least to some degree, from the different reads Pacman gave us. I don't agree with a lot of the stuff Pacman's been saying about you, but to be fair, you've been doing some misrepping back. I feel a lot more comfortable lynching Katie, especially since if she's town,
KatieB wrote:I've said multiple times that I have trouble separating bad town players from bad scum players.
then I'd rather mislynch someone who is self-admittedly bad at scumhunting than someone who is not.
I'm not saying Pacman's post gives me a townread on him, but I definitely consider Katie scummier than Pacman at this point.