In post 632, Scripten wrote:I know I'm campaigning for a meta defense on someone whose sig says to "Stop relying on meta," but I've played with BBT as town and on a scum team with him. When he's town, his reads are all over the place, swinging from town to scum all game. When he's scum, he's much less organic and a lot more consistent. He tunnels pretty hard in either case, including when he's an investigative role like cop. It's a playstyle thing. Granted, I may be wrong about his play in this particular game, as being aware of one's meta is the surest way to subvert it, but I don't think that the case on him is strong enough to justify his lynch
That said, the way Grib presents his case has cast some doubt on my scum read. It's a fairly well-made case, if not one I can get behind, and it seems to come from a town mindset.
BBT's voting and reads jumping about is something that jumped out to me reading over. I was finding it suspicious. But now you've spoken about how this is more in line with his town meta.
Originally, I did also like Grib's argument highlighting the hypocrisy, and then I did find his wishy washy voting and reads as suspicious and was starting to lean slightly scum but now taking what your saying into account I'll now view that part as more in line with town. I don't think he was tunnelling as Beck views it. If you want tunnelling look no further than Beck himself, that's tunnelling. So I right now I'm not sure on a BBT lynch.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
<<