In post 5301, ProHawk wrote:This vote count is depressing. Couldn't lynch Shroomish last game day. Can't lynch him today, I wonder why....
Who would you prefer between the other wagons?
In post 5301, ProHawk wrote:This vote count is depressing. Couldn't lynch Shroomish last game day. Can't lynch him today, I wonder why....
In post 5308, The Goat wrote:
For whatever reason. this scared the fuck out of me. Yes, I'm drunk.
Are you scum?
In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.
In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.
Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.
In post 5385, beastcharizard wrote:I vote me. Considering I am unpoiaonable and I think that is how the kill works. With that I can just stack up on shards and not die. Giving town the most power. Over the shards.
In post 5562, notscience wrote:I don't have my shard anymore.
Fan-fucking-tastic.
Scum can steal it without killing me.
In post 5582, Nero Cain wrote:I guess you should claim your other results too
In post 5724, shos wrote:Axtually in closely reading there IS an explanation. The scum JK made both fail, and I did not see him because he is HUMAN. The ability says I will be told id i was targetted by demon or undead - so I misinterpretted it earlier and now weknow what that means, and it has no mention of humans.
Majiffy, fix your shit to 3 days, since dq was a scumlynch. Wonder how you will react when I am copped or dead..
In post 5762, Majiffy wrote:EM jk is what youre describing shos.
In post 5809, Birds of Prey wrote:VOTE: Young and Beautiful
Yeah, this head needs to catch up majorly. This dies unless it got confirmed.
In post 5829, Birds of Prey wrote:In post 5826, Egg wrote:Are you really saying I haven't scum hunted this game. My result on you is a possible guilty. I usually vote those.
Who is this to?
In post 5837, Birds of Prey wrote:
I think the opposite. If we have two vigs, that makes no sense. If the killer of Serene doesn't claim they can't claim vig under duress.
In post 5838, Birds of Prey wrote:In post 5832, Egg wrote:In post 5829, Birds of Prey wrote:In post 5826, Egg wrote:Are you really saying I haven't scum hunted this game. My result on you is a possible guilty. I usually vote those.
Who is this to?
Prohawk.
Also, Abom's flip is interesting
Explain this please.
In post 5848, Birds of Prey wrote:In post 5845, Egg wrote:It's actually not a bad question for a yes/no.
How did you get a "guilty" on ProHawk?
In post 5849, Birds of Prey wrote:Also, how could shos have made the vig kill? If shos gets an ability to use on the next night related to flavor, how could have serene given shos a kill when he seems to be a VT?
In post 5991, Birds of Prey wrote:How does it make sense that Mhork is a one shot watcher and we have a multiple shot tracker?
In post 6021, Birds of Prey wrote:
Because they are likely scum. They are still pissed at my suspicion and the fact they'll have to keep handing out their friendly neighbor to people when it likely doesn't exist. As long as I'm here, they aren't conftown. A real town wouldn't be bothered by me suspecting them.
In post 6023, ProHawk wrote:I personally think the hammering=gets shard thing is bogus, but that could just be me.
Also, random thought while I was doing some re-reading... if you knew you were the person doing the poisoning, would you early-claim poison-proof?