In post 1775, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: mirari
I thought about it and I don't want mala lynched. Grim's role suggests that being neighborized is bad, which means there must be a role that is hindered by it. Mala's role fits.
Interesting again, but I do agree with you on Grim's role.
I disagree. Whisker's claim doesn't overlap with my PM. If any of them are scum neighborizer I want to say Whiskers rather than Matt's.
Why would I have to wait to use a power N2 if someone can neighborizer AND have a QT on N1.
(Only thing I'm thinking is if this proves Whiskers is town. I don't know. This is really in outguess what the mod was thinking type thing.)
In post 1779, Wisdom wrote:I want to lynch mirari or nacho. If anyone disagrees with my points on them, I want to hear why.
I disagree on both really. I don't want Nacho gone that's for sure and for Mirari I'm still leaning town on her.
In post 1784, shos wrote:All town doesntmake sense. THe two are hardly disabled by gg, and they heavily disturb mala, who is really weak either way.mala has to suRvive through two lynches and two nights to even be able to get one single result, which may or may not be useful at all. Investing FOUR town roles in this scheme is waaaaay overwhelmingly wasting.
There is no way thats the situation.
Whiskers is my obvtown. Matt and mala are more likely scum than gg obviously.
I see no reason not to proceed.
It will be useful because if I hit someone with no QT - then obv it means they are town. If I hit someone with a QT it means they have some type of communication as town or they are scum. End of story. That's not really as weak to me.
In post 1785, Grimgroove wrote:
I don't. That's why I find it odd you're not voting for MattP.
I refer to your own
1739 for the further elabaration of the neighborizing being bad.
The only reason why I'm not voting MattP right now is because I want answers from Mala first. It's too soon to lynch her, but it's also too soon to derail that wagon completely.
I agree with your argument against Nacho he isn't really pushing anyone. The fact this is not consistent with his meta (based on what I heared about it) adds to the discomfort.
I haven't really taken a look at Mirari like. He didn't really stand out, but we can't all be standing out. Should go over your arguments against him.
Answered your questions, but they aren't at par with what you want most likely.
Point of this was?
In post 1789, shos wrote:Mirari might be a little scummy, but as i said in 1784, no way all town. So lynch pool ahoy - mala or matt.
No remove me from the lynch pool.
In post 1791, havingfitz wrote:OK...so I kind of believe Mala's claim. I think that is perhaps the worst crumb I've ever seen but I believe her nonetheless. Wisdom's point about GG having a role that affects the ability to form QTs coupled with the unusual nature (IMO) of a QT cop seems reasonable. If that is a fakeclaim Mala deserves to live a while just for that alone. Also...I reserve the right to change my mind on Mala at any time
That said...there was a reason I started my catch up post yesterday saying I suspected Mala and Matt. I gave my reason for suspecting Mala already. Since no one asked me why I suspected Matt...here 'tis.
When I opened the thread up yesterday I looked at the last page first just to see if anything immediately of interest had happened (or to see if anything had been directed towards me) and I saw that Matt had claimed Neighborizor. WTF? I then proceeded to start my catch up. I will also say at this point I did not realize there had been another neighborizor claim but regardless...I started my catch up with the preconception that Matt was scum (and therefore based on their interations...Mala was too). The reason I had that preconception was:
I'm Hermes. I'm a Neighborizor.
No restriction other than the fact the person I select N1 doesn't join my QT till N2. I can have as many as I like (@ 1 per night). Not sure if they get notified N1 that they were neighborized or not. I assume not.
Why am I claiming? Because my role is pretty much a direct counter of Matt's (vice Whisker's version of Neighborizor) and I think it's a pretty useless role anyway. I absolutely hate the Neighborizor PR. But when it's in ~direct conflict with another player's claim....maybe it's not so bad.
VOTE: MattP
Why didn't I vote Matt immediately? Because I wanted to finish my catch up first to see if there was anything else I needed to consider and that's when I saw Whisker's claim and was like...Whah? I still suspected Mala and someone (shos?) pointed out that if they were both scum..Mala and Matt...a scum neighborizor was probably better to keep around on the chance mala was something stronger. Her claim changed that for me hence my vote now.
So there you have it. Discuss.
This overlaps with my PM and makes sense with my delay, but blech. I don't really know why there are so many neighborizers.
I still don't see why everyone is condemming Matt, but not Whiskers.
In post 1792, shos wrote:Alright.
Qt cop.
In a game with lovers, scum, and THREE neighbourizers.
What the hell.
You still sound fake.
In post 1793, Grimgroove wrote: In post 1625, Malakittens wrote:It's not a fake claim, Wisdom. I'm a
huge threat to scum and a huge town power favor
.
This was before she claimed QT-cop.
I can't be the only one seeing how this doesn't add up?
In post 1794, Grimgroove wrote:havingfitz does confirm MAttP scum though for me.
I had trouble believing there to be two townsided neighborizers, but three really takes the cake. They can't all be town and MattP made the scummiest claim (both flavor and timing-wise).
Yes because I have a verison of a cop role. A cop role is ONE of the strongest roles for town aka why it's a threat to scum and a strong town power.
What do you not understand about it?
Again same question to you as I had for Fitz.
In post 1795, shos wrote:Dont know who to lynch first, lol. It makes no sense to have THREE neighbourizers in any alignment with malas claim, even without the lovers.
CONFIRM VOTE: MALAKITTENS
You're officially tunneling now yet you are calling me out about doing it to Peng.. Hypocritical much?
In post 1796, havingfitz wrote:^ I would think the more potential QTs there are the more likely there is a "QT cop"....no? And if you are wrong about Matt and/or Mala...which would you rather it be?
In post 1797, Wisdom wrote:Mala's claim is even more legit with a third neighborizer, shos. Why do you disagree?
Checking to see if Shos answered either of these.
In post 1798, Grimgroove wrote:Why is it more legit? Because it's even more useless than we first thought?
I don't think useless claims are more legit. Definitely not considering the fact Malakittens worked up to her claim by softclaiming a role that's a HUGE threat to scum and a HUGE power for town in
1625.
How is it more "useless"?