Committee Mafia - GAME OVER

Mariyta · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:23 pm

VOTE: GLORK

Mariyta · Post Post #6 (isolation #1) » Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:28 pm

Glork all the way!! He's the mayor!

Mariyta · Post Post #14 (isolation #2) » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:19 pm

Glork will legalize prostitution! Vote for Glork!

Mariyta · Post Post #39 (isolation #3) » Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:59 pm

lordy wrote:Vote Lordy For Mayor!
I will legalise public nudity!
Dont beat around the bush, show Bush your bush!

I don't think I want to see most of these people naked.....

Mariyta · Post Post #41 (isolation #4) » Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:10 pm

Glork wrote:
Mariyta wrote:
lordy wrote:Vote Lordy For Mayor!
I will legalise public nudity!
Dont beat around the bush, show Bush your bush!
I don't think I want to see most of these people naked.....
...but some of them....

<3

I see you naked all the time, so it doesn't count. <3

Mariyta · Post Post #47 (isolation #5) » Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:58 pm

Glork is the cutest of all the candidates. Trust me.

Mariyta · Post Post #82 (isolation #6) » Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:41 pm

I will be gone July 2-8. My vote remains solidly on GLORK FOR MAYOR!!!

Mariyta · Post Post #157 (isolation #7) » Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:24 pm

Vote: Coron

for voting the mayor!

Mariyta · Post Post #174 (isolation #8) » Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:35 am

Unvote, Vote: Max

Bad form, buddy boy. Is the person you chose dead right now? Or are they still alive?

Mariyta · Post Post #194 (isolation #9) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:10 am

He's not allowed to claim flavor. Mod rules. It's pretty apparent who he killed though. The question now becomes whether his kills are meant to be helpful, or hurtful.

Mariyta · Post Post #200 (isolation #10) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:22 am

Mastermind of Sin wrote: ......As he turns onto Main Street, a molotov cocktail comes crashing through his car window, exploding before he has time to react.
Colonel Kurtz
is no more...........

NOTICE: NO FLAVOR IS ALLOWED TO BE CLAIMED. YOU MAY ONLY CLAIM YOUR ROLE SIMPLIFICATIONS (OR FAKE ONES, OBVIOUSLY). SINCE YOU ALL LIVE IN THIS TOWN, EVERYONE "KNOWS" THE "FLAVOR" BEHIND THE ROLES, SO NO FLAVOR CLAIMING IS TO BE ALLOWED. ANY BREACH OF THIS RULE WILL RESULT IN A MODKILL IMMEDIATELY

A) He can't tell us much more about his role w/o being modkilled (which would achieve the same goal as a lynch I guess...).

B) Read the scenes. They give clues as to who did the killing.

Mariyta · Post Post #203 (isolation #11) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:29 am

I'm not. I just don't like to see people modkilled for stupid reasons. If he can explain more of his role w/o revealing flavor, I'm all for it. I would rather see him lynched than modkilled though.

Mariyta · Post Post #209 (isolation #12) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:17 am

The more I think about it, the more I scum wouldn't want to draw attention to themselves the way Max did.

Unvote

for now.

Mariyta · Post Post #213 (isolation #13) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:24 am

pablito wrote:cool, I foresaw the "I scum" statement the second it happened.
confirm vote: Mariyta
for that slip

Wow. I have no idea why I wrote that. I do deserve to be lynched for that. If I were scum, I'd feel pretty stupid right now. Hell, I feel pretty stupid as it is. I'm trying to remember what I was actually going to write, but it's just not coming. /shrug

Mariyta · Post Post #215 (isolation #14) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:29 am

Maybe I meant to say the more I THINK scum..... or the more I BELIEVE scum.....
Yeah, I don't know. And now it's gonna drive me nuts.

Mariyta · Post Post #217 (isolation #15) » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:38 am

If it was anyone else who made that slip, I'd vote for them, so yes, I do think I deserve to at least be voted by a few people. It was a dumb mistake. I have no excuse for it.

Mariyta · Post Post #232 (isolation #16) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:28 am

pablito wrote:Mariyta's overraction may just be the way that she usually reacts though. It's a path worth pursuing.

It wasn't an overreaction at all.

Mariyta · Post Post #236 (isolation #17) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:03 am

petroleumjelly wrote:Did you target Pooky, Max?

I would like to know the answer to that question as well, cause that's not who I was assuming.....

Mariyta · Post Post #238 (isolation #18) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:46 am

Interesting.... I'm pretty sure he didn't kill Pooky....

Mariyta · Post Post #240 (isolation #19) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:18 am

Well, the descriptions for one. Although I guess "blow up" could somewhat hint at a shot gun, but I'm not sure about that.

Mariyta · Post Post #245 (isolation #20) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:30 am

He couldn't have killed Pooky. I did.

Mariyta · Post Post #249 (isolation #21) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:38 am

You're going to kill me tonight? Are you SK? I'm sorry, but I refuse to go along w/ the Max kill. I think it's a bad idea.

Vote: rajrhcpfreak

Mariyta · Post Post #251 (isolation #22) » Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:40 am

I didn't have a choice. I have to kill.

On another note, could our first mayor be a member of the mafia? What an interesting twist.

Mariyta · Post Post #265 (isolation #23) » Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:57 am

@Glork: I don't know why I chose Pooky. MoS was asking me for a target, so I looked at the list and he's the one that stood out. At that point, I had no way of knowing who was scum and who wasn't.

@PJ and Yaw: Don't forget, this is an MoS game. Yes, it's odd that a vig would be forced to kill, but I am. Nothing I can do about that.

@Nightson: I really don't think it was an overreaction. Everyone keeps saying that, but I don't feel it is. It was a mistake, yes, but it was a stupid mistake.

@Everyone: I wouldn't put myself out here like this if I wasn't pro-town and feeling strongly about Max's innocence. Make whatever decision you feel you need to make, but please examine everything before you do.

Mariyta · Post Post #271 (isolation #24) » Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:01 am

mudbuck wrote:
Mariyta wrote:@Everyone:
I wouldn't put myself out here like this if I wasn't pro-town
and feeling strongly about Max's innocence. Make whatever decision you feel you need to make, but please examine everything before you do.
Wait, a person does not think about boundaries in writing unless he or she has an agenda. In this case, it is going past that boundary, so the writer would have to be doing something against routine, habit, or the norm. I suspect, then, that Mariyta is scummy.

Yes, dear, I do have an agenda. It's to keep myself alive another day.

Mariyta · Post Post #274 (isolation #25) » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:04 am

rajrhcpfreak wrote:
Mariyta wrote:
mudbuck wrote:
Mariyta wrote:@Everyone:
I wouldn't put myself out here like this if I wasn't pro-town
and feeling strongly about Max's innocence. Make whatever decision you feel you need to make, but please examine everything before you do.
Wait, a person does not think about boundaries in writing unless he or she has an agenda. In this case, it is going past that boundary, so the writer would have to be doing something against routine, habit, or the norm. I suspect, then, that Mariyta is scummy.
Yes, dear, I do have an agenda. It's to keep myself alive another day.
if you were wanting to live another day then you would be voting max. i dont buy your vig claim.

That's where your downfall will lie. I won't vote for Max, and I can't say anything more about my role w/o going over the line into flavor. /shrug Do what you will.

Mariyta · Post Post #283 (isolation #26) » Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:44 pm

Yes, I did. I fully admit to it. And I admit to any more I make while I'm in this game. I'm a vig, I have to kill. It's my job.

Mariyta · Post Post #300 (isolation #27) » Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:27 am

slaking_master wrote:ok, Max seems to have a reasonable explanation, so i will
unvote
for now, but i will
FoS:Max and Mariyta
due to avoiding questions untill recently for Max, and dwelling over a typo for Mariyta.

It's no longer about the typo. Please catch up.

Mariyta · Post Post #314 (isolation #28) » Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:51 am

I didn't "go berserk". I think people who are voting me based on my "reaction" to my typo are either stupid or scum.

If the TOWN feels they need to off me to limit kills, so be it. I would be a very useful tool though, with the town knowing who will be NKed before it actually happens.

@Drummer: Please read the thread. You'd know who had a shotgun.

Vote: Yaw

Mariyta · Post Post #339 (isolation #29) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:40 am

I'm all for being stifled or directed. My goal is to help the town, and that's what I intend to do. Right now, if approved, the players I would target would be Yaw and/or Raj (assuming one isn't lynched). They are the ones I see as most scummy. Once we get closer to a lynch, I would love discussion about who I should kill.

Mariyta · Post Post #341 (isolation #30) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:46 am

rajrhcpfreak wrote:
unvote
vote: Mariyta

i think i agree with Yaw.

my top 3 scummist people is mariyta, glork, and pj

and if you look at glork's post you see him only fosing mariyta and pj and agreeing with mariyta being mayor.

Sounds like scum buddies trying to not look like scum buddies.

Mariyta · Post Post #364 (isolation #31) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:13 am

Confirm Vote: Yaw

for clearly being scum, and

FOS: FA

for flying off the handle and completely overreacting before reading the entire thread. Max DIDN'T KILL POOKY. I DID.

And Yaw, don't tell people to not outguess the mod when you clearing are doing so by trying to convince people that I'm SK, regardless of what the mod told me.....

Mariyta · Post Post #366 (isolation #32) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:41 am

Nightson wrote:
FATty ACid wrote: Therefore, Max is lying, Max is scum, and Max should be lynched.

QED
Max,

Give FA an item tonight in order to prove your role.

Preferably not something that would give her too much power, since she seems a bit like a loose cannon at this point...

Mariyta · Post Post #367 (isolation #33) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:43 am

Damn. Just looked. For some reason I thought I was voting Yaw.

Unvote, Vote: Yaw

Mariyta · Post Post #376 (isolation #34) » Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:21 pm

I'M NOT ANTI-TOWN IF THE MOD SAY'S I'M PRO-TOWN. STOP "TRYING TO OUTGUESS THE MOD".

Yaw, you're absolutely full of crap.

Mariyta · Post Post #389 (isolation #35) » Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:52 am

I'd like to point out again (and yes, I know it will most likely be considered wifom)...

Why on earth would I put myself on the line like this if I were scum or an SK? No one had any suspicions of me. It would be a dumb gambit to try to make this play to be safe later in the game. Think, people. Does it really make any sense?

I noticed the possible importance of Max's role, and when he said Pooky, I realized losing him could be very bad.

Mariyta · Post Post #393 (isolation #36) » Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:13 am

Yaw, you are going to be responsible for the town losing this game. I can see it now.

Mariyta · Post Post #395 (isolation #37) » Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:24 am

I don't know if he's scum yet or not, but he's playing pretty poorly either way.

Mariyta · Post Post #403 (isolation #38) » Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:36 pm

First off, screw you, armlx. Trying to imply I'm a bad player just because I'm not on your special list is shitty.

Second, Yaw, stop acting like an idiot. Your play is horrendous, and you're going to lose this for the town. If your scum, good job. If you're not, get your head out of your ass.

Third, I can't go into the committee thing, because it would involve bringing out flavor to explain it enough so people understand, and I can't do that. I'm sorry.

Mariyta · Post Post #415 (isolation #39) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:33 am

Yaw wrote:2 -- I'm absolutely positive I've never seen at least the bolded section before. I think I would have remembered something that far out of context. Why is that there?

Pretty sure he's using it to explain why he didn't respond ASAP..... Are you purposely trying to play dumb?

Mariyta · Post Post #417 (isolation #40) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:05 am

I'm pretty sure almost everyone else got what he was saying.....

Mariyta · Post Post #422 (isolation #41) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:27 am

Is it just me or does it seem like Glork's done a 180?

Mariyta · Post Post #434 (isolation #42) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:29 pm

I like your vote for the mayor too, but since we elected the mayor before roles were sent out, would MoS make the mayor scum?

Mariyta · Post Post #443 (isolation #43) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:32 pm

People are clearly not bothering to read previous posts before they put in their thoughts....

Mariyta · Post Post #449 (isolation #44) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 5:13 pm

Yeah, I'm not seeing what you're trying to get at.

Mariyta · Post Post #451 (isolation #45) » Sun Jul 23, 2006 5:22 pm

Yeah, I would think it would depend on the committee. /shrug

Mariyta · Post Post #515 (isolation #46) » Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:56 am

Unvote

I believe the claim.

If people could start discussing who they want vigged as well, it'd be much appreciated.

Mariyta · Post Post #537 (isolation #47) » Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:43 pm

Here's a theory, not really sure what to think of it, but it popped into my head just now, so I figured I'd throw it out there. We assume we have a committee of cops... what if we also have a committee of recievers (sheriffs or whatever) to receive their results? Or at least a group. Maybe not a committee in its purest form, but a group of them.... Again, just a thought.

Mariyta · Post Post #545 (isolation #48) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:48 am

I like the Masterchief lynch idea.

Unvote, Vote: MC

Now, who do I vig tonight? Or do we want to have an RB block me?

Mariyta · Post Post #547 (isolation #49) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:12 am

He won't get the results though, so they'll go to waste. Or is that not considered a night action?

Mariyta · Post Post #558 (isolation #50) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:04 am

I chose Pookie kind of at random. MoS was asking for a choice, so I looked at the list. Pookie is one I can never read, so I picked him. /shrug

Mariyta · Post Post #563 (isolation #51) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:40 am

Isn't there anyone (aside from Bogre) who DOESN'T support a Bogre vig?

Mariyta · Post Post #570 (isolation #52) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:29 pm

Bogre wrote:Oh...and Mariyta...how sure are you that you killed Pooky?

Pretty darn sure. I wasn't blocked, he wasn't killed in more than one way, and it follows the flavor of my role.

Mariyta · Post Post #571 (isolation #53) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:32 pm

Bogre wrote:Oh...and Mariyta...how sure are you that you killed Pooky?

Pretty darn sure. I wasn't blocked, he wasn't killed in more than one way, and it follows the flavor of my role.

Mariyta · Post Post #573 (isolation #54) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:47 pm

How can I make it any clearer to you?

Mariyta · Post Post #577 (isolation #55) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:44 pm

I don't think I can answer the question about the gun w/o going into flavor. As I said before, it follows the flavor of my role.

Mariyta · Post Post #578 (isolation #56) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:49 pm

I'm not sure I believe Bogre's claim. I mean, it's possible, but if he wasn't roleblocked, I would think Pookie would be killed twice, not once.

Mariyta · Post Post #580 (isolation #57) » Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:59 pm

I am told what mine is, and it does match Pookie's death.

Mariyta · Post Post #605 (isolation #58) » Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:57 am

I agree w/ no mayor, maybe some lurker for a vig?

Mariyta · Post Post #614 (isolation #59) » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:45 am

I would really like some more input on who to vig. If no one but Sarcastro gives me a target, I will gladly vig Sarcastro himself for jumping on the chance to get rid of Vaughn so quickly (may be innocent, but may also be scum jumping at a chance to get rid of more town.)

Mariyta · Post Post #619 (isolation #60) » Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:45 am

No, Slaking, I don't know.

Mmk, right now, my vig target is Vaughn. It may change based on developments though.

Mariyta · Post Post #643 (isolation #61) » Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:33 pm

I'll vig either MC or SM, whoever is alive when we go to night.

Mariyta · Post Post #659 (isolation #62) » Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:05 am

If we lose another possible lynch to a mod-kill because they didn't follow the rules, I will be so not happy.....

PLEASE DO NOT GET YOURSELVES MOD-KILLED AND REVEAL FLAVOR. PAY ATTENTION!!!!

Mariyta · Post Post #673 (isolation #63) » Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:19 am

Ok folks, seriously, stop getting yourselves killed. It's like people are trying to avoid a lynch or something.....

Mariyta · Post Post #677 (isolation #64) » Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:51 am

Vote: Sarcastro

So far, I haven't seen much in the way of helpfulness from him.

Mariyta · Post Post #681 (isolation #65) » Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:30 pm

Sarcastro wrote:Could you be a little more specific, Mariyta?

Nope, not right now.

Mariyta · Post Post #703 (isolation #66) » Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:52 am

mmk.

Unvote, Vote: slaking_master

Right now, I'll vig Blackberry or Mudbuck. Who is mudbuck anyway? Has he/she even posted?

Mariyta · Post Post #712 (isolation #67) » Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:47 am

Just a note: I didn't list him because of what he said in his post. I don't remember that post and I didn't remember hearing from him at all. I listed 2 people I felt had contributed little or nothing to the game.

Mariyta · Post Post #716 (isolation #68) » Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:38 am

slaking_master wrote:Well, since the scum know each other (or so ive inferred from reactions to my post), they know who is pro-town and who isnt (assuming only 1 scum group, but even still killing other scum groups is fine). Therefore the scum already know if he is pro-town. i do not wish for you to claim for either of them, but i think it would help the town simply for you to show us which post(s) lead you to be so sure of their (Vaughn and Mudbuck) innocence.

You seem to be doing everything possible to avoid having to give us any information, yet you expect us to follow you blindly? I just don't buy it.

I understand Glork's reluctance to give out their roles (and I'm sure they're very glad he won't). Yes, the scum know everyone who's most likely pro-town, but what they don't know is how useful that person's role is. It's best to keep from revealing roles at this early in the game.

While Glork may possibly be scum, I still trust his instincts this early in the game. He's been playing a lot longer than either of us have.

Mariyta · Post Post #723 (isolation #69) » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:36 am

But there is incentive for Blackberry to step forth and participate.

Mariyta · Post Post #737 (isolation #70) » Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:18 pm

Glork wrote:
Я думаю что, если Vaughn чувствует, то шансы его будучи убиванным всю ночь значительно достаточно, он имеют значительный стимул, котор нужно востребовать получить "защитников Vig Vaughn" его назад. Я чувствую этой дорогой потому что я думаю Vaughn будет про-gorodok и не хочет увидеть он убило.

Dude! I think you just called Ibby a rhino with an elephant stuck to her butt!!!!

Mariyta · Post Post #743 (isolation #71) » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:28 am

Just to be clear, right now I'm looking at Blackberry because we have no reason whatsoever to believe he is a good guy, and he hasn't bothered to come forward at all. Mudbuck and Vaughn at least both spoke up. No one has bothered to put forth any other suggestions (and I will not vig Max or Yaw at this point), so Blackberry is my best choice.

Mariyta · Post Post #744 (isolation #72) » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:29 am

And to try to get things moving a bit faster.....

Unvote, vote: slaking_master

Mariyta · Post Post #750 (isolation #73) » Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:07 am

Well, right now I think the process is: I tell you who I'm going to vig, people weigh in and tell me whether they think it's a good idea or not. Whoever, at the end of the day, I have suggested, and either hasn't weighed in themselves, or has been a target of "I'd be ok w/ a ________ lynch" will be the one I kill. It's not so much directing my vig as me asking opinions so the town as a whole doesn't lose someone they see as valuable. Sound fair?

Mariyta · Post Post #752 (isolation #74) » Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:17 am

I don't understand your post at all, PJ, but my own analysis of Pab's posts determined Pablito is a) ripe for a lynch, or b) ripe for a vig. He's vig target #2.

Unvote, vote: Pablito

Mariyta · Post Post #771 (isolation #75) » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:17 am

Slaking, the "I'm a newb" claim doesn't work. Trust me, I tried it my first game, no one bought it. Just admit you're scum and be done w/ it.

Mariyta · Post Post #773 (isolation #76) » Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:12 am

I'll vote/vig Slaking and Pablito. Whichever way it goes, I don't care. Lynch one, I'll kill the other.

Mariyta · Post Post #783 (isolation #77) » Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:27 am

Can we just lynch Pab so I can vig slaking, s'il vous plait?

Mariyta · Post Post #794 (isolation #78) » Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:10 pm

If you're really a cop, Pab, you should know how the cops work. You should be able to at least give him some thoughts as to why he only got one result. You refuse to answer that question though. My vote stands.

Mariyta · Post Post #799 (isolation #79) » Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:15 pm

I don't think revealing the result would be a good idea if it IS an innocent result. I would prefer to keep that person safe for as long as possible. It's not fair to throw a confirmed innocent to the wolves this early in the game.

Mariyta · Post Post #803 (isolation #80) » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:50 am

Nah. No way. Can't be.

Mariyta · Post Post #835 (isolation #81) » Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:31 am

I have to agree w/ the Pablito sentiment. I would rather not lynch a claimed cop day 1.

Unvote

Mariyta · Post Post #837 (isolation #82) » Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:33 pm

I"m ok w/ lynching Slaking, but I don't want it to happen before we can figure out who I'm vigging. I'm not ok with vigging blindly.

Mariyta · Post Post #846 (isolation #83) » Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:13 am

Throwing Blackberry back out there for a vig target.

Mariyta · Post Post #848 (isolation #84) » Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:47 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
Nightson wrote: Why would it be less likely with more people for two votes to coincide? Wouldn't it be mor likely?
Huh...I was thinking that with 4 or 5 cops, there would have to be a majority of 3 votes to have only one target, but thinking about it now, that probably dosn't make sense; probably the person with the MOST votes gets picked, so if there were 2 votes on person X and 1 on everyone else, it'd be person X.

Ok, never mind.

I think that's what Pab said before. Not majority, person w/ most votes.

Mariyta · Post Post #871 (isolation #85) » Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:43 pm

He's the mayor. The power and hookers have gone to his head.

Mariyta · Post Post #914 (isolation #86) » Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:50 pm

Should I just vig Blackberry? Or Mudbuck or Nightson be a better choice?

Mariyta · Post Post #926 (isolation #87) » Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:46 am

Unvote, Vote: Slaking_master

Let's kill him, I'll vig mudbuck.

Mariyta · Post Post #950 (isolation #88) » Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:37 pm

Mmk, Glork, PJ, NO MORE NOVELS!!!!!!!

And PJ, "acting like open masonry" is only going to make people more suspicious of you two. Sorry.

Mariyta · Post Post #979 (isolation #89) » Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:57 am

I could go w/ a Vaughn vig. I won't vig Coron or Lordy, sorry. I would also be ok w/ a Nightson vig. He was pretty silent up until recently (when I mentioned him as a possible vig target).

Mariyta · Post Post #984 (isolation #90) » Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:55 pm

Nightson wrote:
Mariyta wrote: I won't vig Coron or Lordy, sorry.
Is there a specific reason for that that you can reveal?

No spectacular "I know they're not scum" reason, sorry. I just feel at this time, Coron would be a good person to have in the game. He hasn't stuck out to me as scum yet, so I'm not going to lose a potentially valuable player. Same for Lordy.

Mariyta · Post Post #999 (isolation #91) » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:01 am

I'm vigging Nightson. At this point, he seems like the best target.

Mariyta · Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:30 am

For the record, Pablito was the one who said your opinions are advisory (he was referring to me though). If you all want lordy vigged, consider him as good as dead.

Mariyta · Post Post #1045 (isolation #93) » Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:43 am

Yes, PJ, as soon as I saw we went to night, I sent it in.

Mariyta · Post Post #1046 (isolation #94) » Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:48 am

I'm afraid to speculate too much, as it could delve into the realm of flavor, but it's possible me and Yos were on the same committee, but didn't know it. This also means there could be others out there. Possibly Bogre was a part of it too, but he was modkilled, so we won't know until the end.

Mariyta · Post Post #1049 (isolation #95) » Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:55 am

Or to figure out who you think seems innocent enough to pull it off?

Mariyta · Post Post #1056 (isolation #96) » Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:22 pm

I wouldn't be too surprised if I was blocked, since everyone knew what I was going to do. Especially if the scum have powers, which I'm not willing to rule out.

Mariyta · Post Post #1123 (isolation #97) » Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:58 am

WAIT!!!! Did I miss where Vaughn was 100% cleared? Or is everyone just assuming he is because Glork says so?

For those who seem to be following blindly: Glork and PJ talk a lot. That's doesn't mean they're not scum. Make sure you're finding out the facts for yourself and not just following their lead.

Mariyta · Post Post #1140 (isolation #98) » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:02 am

My biggest concern with the Glork/PJ thing is not that I think they're scum. I don't know if they are or not. But it seems people are following them blindly, and Glork A) tells people "trust me, they're not scum, then B) accuses people of following him blindly. It would be quite a game to have 2 scum lead us the entire game only to have them blindside us in the end.....

Mariyta · Post Post #1153 (isolation #99) » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:41 pm

Yaw wrote:
Glork wrote:Why do you think that Slaking presented the theory he did, judging from his relative inexperience and the unusual nature of such a theory?
I don't know. I don't
care
. He was scum and he was
lying
. Why bother with the WIFOM game trying to figure out why he lied? It's not likely to be relevant even if we could figure it out. Running around in circles isn't going to lead us to scum.

While I agreed that going into whether he was lying or not is stupid since he's dead, I do think we can get some information to peoples' reactions to his statement. Some questions to ask when we're looking back:

-Do any reactions seem overboard in one direction or the other?
-Does it look like anyone could be trying to covertly coach SM's comments?
-Does anyone seem overly upset by his comments?

Mariyta · Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:14 am

Drummer seems to be caught in a horrible inconsistency. Do you care to respond?

Vote: Drummer

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:41 am

Before we decide on a lynch, I'd either like a vig target, or be made mayor so I don't have to do anything. Up to the town as to what direction to go, but I'd like it settled before we off someone. Right now I'm leaning toward Vaughn again, since he seems to have disappeared. Coron would be another choice.

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:01 am

Of course someone saying you're scum doesn't sit well with you.....

For the record, Glork is on my vig list too.

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:57 am

So Drummer is at lynch-3. If we go to night soon, I'll be vigging Glork and voting myself mayor.

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:55 am

Well, the vig situation won't change tonight. I wouldn't become the mayor until tomorrow. It would just be nice to not have to beg for a target every day.

Just fyi, I'll always vig the way the town wants me to as a whole (not just one or 2 people). I won't follow my own instinct unless I feel very strongly about it.

And I know some people are worried about the 2 votes for mayor thing, but if I were the mayor, I promise to never place the lynching vote (Damn, I've become a politician. I need a shower).

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:18 am

I'd vig chamber.

Mariyta · Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:22 pm

I don't think Pab said that, I think someone else was talking about that. I remember seeing that and being confused.

Mariyta · Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:59 am

Before the lynch, I need a vig target.

Mariyta · Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:55 pm

Glork, you need to get off Yaw. Do you really believe that we'd only have 1 person w/ the ability to receive cop results, yet have a committee of cops?

Unvote

How sure are we that Mudbuck and Glork are really RBs? Glork "caught" some breadcrumb that Mudbuck laid, when no one else could. If we go with this theory that scum don't know each other, couldn't he have cooked the RB thing up to cover his and his buddy's tracks?

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:56 am

Who's my vig target? I need a town consensus

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:38 am

Wait, didn't Glork insist I not kill Vaughn before?

And I will not make a kill simply based on one or two peoples' opinions. I want a solid verdict by the town, or I will pick completely at random and hope Glork blocks me.

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:41 am

Pab, you'll get my night choice tonight. Mayor doesn't take effect until the next day.

I will vig Vaughn. I think I'm still voting Drummer. If not

Unvote, Vote Drummer

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:22 pm

Let's just lynch and get the day over with. I don't think we'll learn anything new.

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:23 pm

Um, I had a thought. Everyone knows what I am. What happens if I'm voted mayor, but I die tonight?

Mariyta · Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:16 pm

I will vig Vaughn.

Mariyta · Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:46 am

I sent in the choice right after I said I was going to do it. I didn't get anything saying I was blocked or anything like that. I don't know what happened. I have theories, but I'm not ready to share them, in case someone wants to use them as an excuse or cover.

Mariyta · Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:34 pm

One thing we don't have to discuss is who I'll vig!! (I think.... We're certain that the inability to perform a nightchoice is the night after, not the night before, right?)

Mariyta · Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:38 pm

Thanks MoS!! <3

Mariyta · Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:22 am

Have we confirmed Pab? Is he really a cop and is just being a jerk for some reason? Or did he want to wait for Yaw to give a solid answer so he didn't get caught in a trap? My vote is going on Raj today, and Pablito tomorrow, unless I'm given any other reason to not do so. His play today is horrid.

Vote: Raj

Mariyta · Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:22 am

I don't know. Sounds like a bit of crap to me. I guess we'll see how it turns out.

Mariyta · Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:52 am

If Vaughn won, that means he no longer has to play, right? He said he'd "help" us find scum or whatever. But if he's won, and he can leave, he's just wasting a lynch/vig for us.

Mariyta · Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:27 am

That's usually one of the conditions of a win. You're done playing

Mariyta · Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:27 am

If you blocked me, protected him, or did something else to insure his survival in this game, it does indeed

imply that you intended to protect him

. Chamber, your previous comment implies that you had no control over your actions....

I hope you realize that refusing to explain anything at all at any point in any game will lead to your lynch in every game, regardless of being townie. Let's not have a repeat of Charmed, please.

Mariyta · Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 am

I discussed something that already happened....

Mariyta · Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Pablito is acting so scummy.

Mariyta · Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:41 pm

I like being named mayor again. It's nice not having the pressure of a forced kill.

Mariyta · Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:27 pm

I'll be on vacation Friday 9/29-Monday 10/2, then limited access until 10/8. Replace me if needed, but I'll do my best to keep up.

Mariyta · Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:59 pm

Sarcastro? Nice. I guess he is always scum.

Mariyta · Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:26 pm

Do we have an MBL claim? With only one death and Vaughn claiming he was blocked,might be something to look at.

Mariyta · Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:13 am

Wasn't asking for a claim. Just asking if we already had one. I think the MBL/Vaughn situation should be looked at closely, as it could give us clues.

Mariyta · Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:50 pm

Are we going to make me mayor again? Or am I vigging someone tonight?

Mariyta · Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:21 am

Hell, I like being uber-protected, 99% confirmed. Makes my life easier. But if we need the vig, I'm willing to risk it.

Mariyta · Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:59 am

I agree w/ Goat. I don't think that cop should come forward yet. Why risk having all our cops knocked off in one night?

Mariyta · Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:59 am

Ok, ok. I admit it. I'm the cop.

**Kidding!!!!**

Mariyta · Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:39 am

Could Pab be lying and going on luck and what he's gleaned from other people's actions? Could he have figured out who the other 2 cops are and be making things up?

For the record, I will not vote at all today. Having 2 votes, I'm afraid I'll accidently lynch.

Mariyta · Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:39 am

I actually buy that. Makes a lot of sense.

Mariyta · Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:46 am

I said I wasn't going to vote, but Pab put out a really good case that I hadn't seen before, and since I'm the first 2 votes on him....

Vote Eon

Mariyta · Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:48 am

Maybe Rosso had the night choice of "investigating" someone and he found out a) if they were a cop/receiver and b) their sanity?

Mariyta · Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:33 am

I think we should lynch Eon since he's more questionable than Sacastro. We know Sarcastro is scum.

Mariyta · Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:39 am

I'm ok w/ taking out of few of the scum.

Mariyta · Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:40 am

Question: Would I get to kill tonight, or do I have to wait til tomorrow night?

Mariyta · Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:34 am

What about one of the cops? Like Goat or olio? If Pab's theory is true, we're safe putting one of them as mayor.

Mariyta · Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:45 am

That's a very good point. If there are any docs left, let's hope they protect our boys.

Mariyta · Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:34 pm

Pab doesn't read my posts.

Mariyta · Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:48 am

Was I the one who killed Lordy (I did target him, but was I blocked) or was it the other vig who is now dead? I remember some debate over why he was only shot once.

Mariyta · Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:22 am

I'm pretty sure Yosarian was the one who killed lordy, based on special knowledge that I have that I can't reveal due to a possible anvil drop that I'm not interested in.

Mariyta · Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:56 am

Yay!. Remember, don't vote me mayor. Vote Olio or Nightson.

Mariyta · Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:40 am

Oh. Woops. Ignore me then.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:25 am

Glork, how could you?

Mariyta · Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:58 pm

Wait, did Yaw say only one kill last night? I've reread that a couple times, and I'm confused. There were 3 kills last night. Probably both scum groups and maybe an SK? Just to refresh everyone's minds, I did NOT kill last night.

Mariyta · Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:03 am

Who should I vig?

Mariyta · Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:18 am

I really hope we find out who's mayor and stuff so we can get going. This was a very active game before the crashes.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:20 am

Who were the other claimed roleblockers aside from Glork? Mudbuck and who else?

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:39 am

We pretty much know who our lynch is. But we need more than that before we go to night. Glork was the one who was pushing the cult thing, so I'm not believing that theory. Is there a list of people still living? The first post doesn't help me at all.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:45 am

Nevermind. I found it. Here is my sure townie/not so sure/scummy list.

Town-Olio, Mariyta, Yaw, The Goat, pablito
Not so sure-Nightson, Starkmoon, MBL, Al_kohaulec, TSQ
Definate scum-Sarcastro

Nightson has posted a decent post since day started. The rest have been pretty much useless. I do believe we need to lynch Sarcastro today, but we also need to discuss the others. Stark said she'd read, never got a result from her reading. I'd like to hear what the others have to say as well. They've all been pretty inactive.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:30 am

We actually don't really need a mayor for this. We know who the two options were. We know who's in question. We can start the discussions now then work from there.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:38 am

It was The Goat and Olio who were confirmed by being cops together. They can confirm each other's results. Pab is the one who's results are received by Yaw. Sarc is the one w/ the guilty investigation. And we did decide the mayoral vote in a way. It was one of The Goat and Olio, but we wanted to make it somewhat random so the scum couldn't off them last night.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:46 am

What did armlx claim?

Mariyta · Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:04 am

Well, damn.... it sounds like a reasonable role that MoS would make up... I think I would rather save that one for later in the game if it comes down to it....

Isn't MBL usally a lot more active than this? Possible scum tell?

Mariyta · Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:11 am

Yeah, I don't want to go into this blind. Consider my vig as another lynch.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:16 am

Correct, I couldn't kill last night. But I can tonight.

I don't think we have 4. It is possible we have another vig, but considerring 2 are already dead, and we (or at least I) assume they were forced vigs, I am more apt to think it is an SK. Sarcastro is definately the lynch for today. We just need to decide who to vig tonight.

As per your questions, I submitted Lordy as my target that night. The town wanted me to kill him, I said I would. As I've said many times over, my vig is like an extra lynch for the town. I will not kill anyone of my own accord without getting the approval of the rest of the town. I do believe Yos was the only one responsible for the kill. I did not receive any information that I was blocked or anything, so why his went through and mine didn't, I have no idea.

I submitted no kill last night because I was already informed that it wouldn't work. As per your theory, we know Sarcastro has to be either a thug or goon. That would put that scum group at 4, indicating that the other group probably has 4 as well, so that's another scum. An SK would make sense as well. And there's our 3 kills.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:16 am

I would like to vig MBL.

Mariyta · Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:40 am

Just letting you know I've heard both your cases, and I would like input from others before I make a decision. If I haven't already,

Vote: Sarcastro

.

Mariyta · Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:15 am

Ok, let's get this lynch done with. I'll vig Starkmoon. Who's mayor? We can stick with the same plan as last time since we never got our mayor this time.

Mariyta · Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:56 am

Go for it. It'll give them a chance to defend themselves if there is indeed another vig instead of an SK.

Mariyta · Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:24 am

That's a pretty solid case, but I'd still like to hear a defense from Nightson, and then some input from the other 2 (who have been just sitting back so far).

Mariyta · Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:07 am

pablito wrote:I'm pretty sure that Nightson is scum and is avoiding the thread, but for his benefit of a doubt he did post this in limited access:

Nightson wrote:Finals are killing me, I'll hang out in scumchat but don't expect anything from me in games for at least the next two days.

Also I'll be on vacation from December 26th-January 2nd

Yeah, that's lame. Finals have been over for a week.

Mariyta · Wed Dec 27, 2006 12:25 pm

I agree. We need to get this over with. I will be vigging Starkmoon tonight.

Unvote, vote Sarcastro

if I need to.

Mariyta · Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:02 pm

Mmk. We have our mayor (I think we should elect him again), and we can kill Sarcastro. I'll vig Starkmoon. Someone lynch.

Mariyta · Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:20 pm

*cry*

Mariyta · Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:57 am

Hi! I have a paper due today, but I should be able to catch up by this afternoon. I've been semi-watching the thread, so it shouldn't take too long.

Mariyta · Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:46 am

Simplification is doctor. I don't have who I protected each night. I'm supposed to talk to Nightson to get those and he hasn't responded yet.

Mariyta · Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:20 am

That's not possible.

Mariyta · Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:26 am

Alko's claim. I just don't believe it. He's either full of it and trying to frame me, or the mod screwed up (which I doubt).

Mariyta · Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:21 am

It's not lynch or lose, so that's a good plan.

Mariyta · Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:02 am

Vote: Mari

Just to speed things along. Good job guys.