Parama wrote:vote: Nicodemus
because he said his town meta is scummy
So did Starbuck. Why be selective here?
animorpherv1 wrote:Nachomamma8 wrote:Vote: animorpherv1
For the weak FoS comboed with a failure to vote change. Isn't my being the only person to refuse to answer your random questions a better reason than the one behind your random vote? If not, why the FoS?
Lnyhcing players who call their town play scummy is not a random vote.
Just to clarify, are you pushing for a policy lynch? Also, as above, Starbuck said this too. I'd accept it as a reason to vote if you were consistent, but here it just looks like you're aiming for me specifically.
Parama wrote:You wanted to take the leadership role so you can get a lynch wagon going. It's
likely
a ML.
Unless I'm misinterpreting, you already have a strong town read on ani? Could you confirm or deny this?
kunkstar7 wrote:Slaxx wrote:That is just the way Nacho plays. I have played with him before and he is pretty good at picking out mafia. He is a very striaghtforward player who isnt afraid to throw around his vote and use it to his advantage.
Nacho's thought pattern is clear. He was using his vote as a means of pressuring people who haven't contributed or contributed in a while. He was satisfied with the answer and moved on to the next person. When I feel his vote is uncalled for or I start feeling he isnt contributing, then I will ask him why.
I got Nacho's vote after he posted that, I'm an idiot...
Yeah, backtracking is never a good move. It just makes you look like you were BSing and now want to appease everyone by backing down. While I don't think that you were scummy for the earlier discussion with slaxx (because theory discussion is always nothing more or less than a null tell) this latest development is pretty bad.
FoS: kunkstar
, because L-2 is a little too hot for me right now.
Other scummy peoples:
muh
looks scummy for only RVing when called out on it.
ani
is suspicious for advocating a policy lynch when another player is equally applicable for that same lynch, based on the criteria of the policy. Why me instead of Starbuck?
Nacho
, while not scummy per se, gets a spot here because of his playstyle. I'll accept slaxx's meta of him for now, but I hope that he'll start playing more transparently soon.
Vote: muh
Ythan, on my play: "Scummy and bad are not the same. Some players manage to keep them separate, though I applaud how masterfully you blend them."