Wagon gogogo.
Wait, I've already tried this before.
vote: Sensfan
Policy gogogo.
The Sens vote had nothing to do with reactions. Confidential = private.Kmd4390 wrote:This isn't a good way to play. "OMG I'm getting all these reactions" isn't a reason not to expand on why Sens would be a good policy lynch.Papa Zito wrote:Sorry, confidential.Elaborate please.
Glad you're amused. It's a game, after all.Budja wrote:Zito's lurker hunt amuses me. Your being alittlehypocritical there. So what you think of xvart? Jack? etc. (That kind-of grammatically sucks )
So I iso'd xvart.Budja wrote:xvart seems to compulsively misrep/generalise. Agree/disagree? Scummy or not?
A random cop breadcrumb (if that's even what it was) is null. I would say all the people talking about it are worse than the one who did it.Budja wrote:Jack made a random cop breadcrumb comment and and produces little content. I found that scummy. Do you agree?
It's a private matter, and as good a reason as any for an opening vote. That's really all there is to say about it.Kmd4390 wrote:I don't understand how it can hurt to tell us why Sens should be policy lynched. I don't see how it helps not to tell us. You are making no sense by witholding this.
This isn't the worst plan in the world.Jack wrote:If we aren't going to policy lynch CyberBob we should just lynch CKD and get to day 2.
Well hell. Less talking, more doing then.SensFan wrote:Drippereth wrote:I want to lynch xofelf real bad right now. All this out of game drama is a mega distraction, and scum loves a distraction. Possibly to distract from a buddy being in danger of being lynched.
? Looking forward to this.J-Scope wrote:starbuck might be scum too actually. might need to review that a bit later.
I've seen Sens participating somewhat in the game. I've seen elf do exactly 0. To me there's a fairly substantial difference between the two.farside22 wrote:I'm thinking those calling out elf and neglecting sens are using bs reasoning.Papa Zito wrote:So you're looking at elf and thinking "yeah, that's a townie" right?farside22 wrote:I'd like to lynch SPS, Sens or papa zito. Those calling out elf over sens who is pretty much doing the same thing all get myFOS.
Hey something happened. Where's Plum?Jack wrote:Kill:CyberBob
Hate to waste it this early; but it's for the good of the game.
Why, so the scum can sayCobalt wrote:seriously, think of a scum motivation to fake a daykill
andCobalt wrote:because I do it and I'm always town
andCobalt wrote:faking daykills is supertown
my dear Cobalt.Iecerint wrote:There's nothing anti-town or scummy about faking a daykill AFAIK.
I didn't say it was. I was just answering Cobalt's question.Iecerint wrote:^ Yes, it is possible for scum to fake a daykill to "look town." That does not mean that faking a daykill is anti-town or scummy, which is what SX is implying.
He voted me in 310.ooba wrote:316: @Papa Zito: OMGUS? Iecerint never attacked you?
Eh? Why's this directed at me?ooba wrote:366: @Iecerint\Papa Zito - "Secret towntell"?
Well, see above. I don't think anyone takes OMGUS seriously anymore anyway.ooba wrote:I also realized that Papa Zito did not replay to Iecerint's post 318 where he enquires about the OMGUS
Iecerint does not follow up here either
You (one of you?) has been something of an elf apologist. I wanted to see your reaction to elf's terrible post.Elmocrates wrote:?
Am I getting set up the bomb?
Based on your rather extensive back-and-forth with Sens. You posted several "she may think this" "she may think that" posts.Elmocrates wrote:Based on what? I don't think that's true at all.Papa Zito wrote:You (one of you?) has been something of an elf apologist.
Elmo
Elmo 487 wrote:Whether she actually does is irrelevant. She might mistakenly believe she does.
Elmo 491 wrote:Unless you think xofelf's meta skills are perfect, there is some reasonable chance that she genuinely thought she had a meta tell on you.
Elmo 496 wrote:It doesn't tell you which games she's read; she might have read previous games where you were scum.
These kinds of quotes are what I'm talking about. I found it weird that you'd make assumptions about xofelf while slamming Sens for making assumptions about xofelf. Or posting any of these at all and just letting xofelf dig her own grave.Elmo 507 wrote: I just don't see how "not being the type" can be so strong that you immediately think she's lying when she asserts a meta read on you.
Sure you can't, but I'd expect people to want xofelf to be the one to respond to it, not Elmo.Jack wrote:I agree with what Elmo was saying in those quotes. You can't just claim someone is lying if it's reasonable to say that they could just be mistaken.
I was using OMGUS in the literal sense. As in, I was saying to Iec "Oh My God You Suck" for voting me. I wasn't accusing him of anything.ooba wrote:Sorry I meant to ask "But how is it OMGUS if you never attacked him?"Papa Zito wrote:He voted me in 310.ooba wrote:316: @Papa Zito: OMGUS? Iecerint never attacked you?
If you don't see it I can't help you. I posted examples.Elmo wrote:I don't see where I've made any assumptions about xofelf or "slammed" Sens. I don't think I've said Sens is suspicious or even incorrect - I dunno where you are getting this from.Papa Zito wrote:I found it weird that you'd make assumptions about xofelf while slamming Sens for making assumptions about xofelf.
Obviously.Elmo wrote:I'm not sure why you think I shouldn't have posted the quoted.
You know what's totally, completely, utterly awesome about this post?xofelf wrote:I understand that there's many votes on me, but i'm sick of being in defense mode, so i'll just accept that they're there. And if i get lynched, then oh well.
No i am not replacing. I know that my participate so far has been shit, and singularly focused, but at this point i'm done with it and i'm not going to acknowledge it at the moment, as it does nothing to help this game at all. Mistaken or lying, whatever you want to say. It's done and over with and i apologize for bringing it up and wasting everyone's time. But please, let's back to this game as deadline is fairly close.
Also, i reserve my votes because i don't like to jump on wagons that i don't see any merit to, and because i don't have to be voting 24/7 to make any more validity to points that are apparent to others other than just me.
NONONONONONONONONONONONOSensFan wrote:Please give some posts where I'd insulted elf or brought personal issues into the game.
This again?Elmocrates wrote:@PapaZito: Why are you characterizing us as Xofelf apologists and not Jack apologists? The way Elmo has been interacting with Sens is pretty much the same as the way I interacted with Iecerint when he hopped on the Jack wagon.
Someone take care of this problem tonight plz.Kmd4390 wrote:Hmm. Started to read up and started getting tired. I'm through page 13 and probably won't go through responding to every little thing, but I'll finish reading and am here if anyone has questions.
Why did the xvart wagon die? Did he get run up to L-1 and claim or something? Where is the xofelf wagon coming from?
I don't suppose anyone else claims to have the silmaril?FeFiFoFum wrote:I didn't claim trackerwatcher upfront because I didn't want people to know that I have the silmaril which They get if they kill me unless im lynched.
Yeah, it sounds really goofy.J-Scope wrote:You take issue with THAT over this sort of shit?
.... wait.FeFiFoFum wrote:EBWOP 836: Look at posts 710-714 and look at Els call for role and then els goes hypocritical and says im role fishing. Terribad.
vote Elds
So you tracked him to Farside, and Farside died.FeFiFoFum wrote:But Since I have the Silmaril I am able to track as well.
I saw him Target Farside.
PLUSJ-Scope wrote:didn't target farside, reading back.
= Elds vote?Jack wrote:By someone. I assume J-Scope because he knew about it somehow.
Oh don't be so lame. If someone else holds it then he's caught in a lie that no amount of crazy role shenanigans can explain away.Steam-Powered Shovel wrote:Papa Zito, no Silmaril-fishing. If he does hold the Silmaril, then he could still easily be scum.
Game rule 2 says "The Silmaril". To me "The" = "One and Only".Iecerint wrote:Aren't there three Silmarils such that CCing would pretty much be useless?
(Since when are protective roles not in large themes?)
He was banned for violating site rules. That's something outside the game. Being the the Hall means he's still technically in the game. I'm hoping he's removed due to the ban (flip is bonus) and we can destroy someone else (hello Elscouta).xvart wrote:The point of destroy is knowing alignment/role name so I don't see how FFFF being banned would change anyone's opinion about destroying/knowing his alignment.Papa Zito wrote:@Mod: Given the Mufasa/FFFF ban, can we wipe those destroy votes plz?
xvart.
I'm being voted on a meta basis? I think that's a first.Budja wrote:vote Zito, said very little, hasn't given the pro-town buzz I would expect
Why?Budja wrote:Not so keen on the Iec hop.
THANK YOUCyberbob wrote:Yeah, it's everyone else's fault for your inability to derive quality reads from a game.
My Iec vote is because of his batshit insane reasons for wagoning xvart.Jack wrote:Isn't the Iec case based on the meta Socio brought up?
You're hard to wagon so the scumz want to buddy you instead?SpyreX wrote:WHAT DOES IT MEAN
Oh goddammit.Cobalt wrote:hi
is anyone else not feeling the usual minty-fresh obvtown aura spyrex usually exudes?
No, and this is why the editing thing sucks.curiouskarmadog wrote:is there an easier way to review passed vote counts that dont involve scanning page by page?
Hallelujah!SpyreX wrote:Papa Zito I accept the initiation of Unbreakable Alliance: The Anti-Meta Coalition
EhhhhhhSpyreX wrote:with the following terms and members:
2.) Sociopath
Done.SpyreX wrote:The only new term is this: No meta. None. This is a plague this game that must be removed even more so than normal.
Elscouta - vigcuriouskarmadog wrote:also spry, please assign the kills last night..you can guess, I am just curious.
Ok then.SpyreX wrote:@Zito:
I'm actually MORE confident in Socio being town than you or, well, anyone but Cyber.
Hay look an Alliance wagon.Grey Moddess wrote:Iecerint - 4 - SocioPath, Cyberbob, Starbuck, Papa Zito
lulzxvart wrote:Just a moment - what the fuckbucket is this unbreakable alliance nonsense? Are you chumps setting up voting blocks to instalynch people from this point on? Or is it a way to not so subtly mask your buddy buddy tenancies with the other scum by having most of them voting along "party lines" with the rest of these jokers who seem to only speak in half astute, half sentence accusations and other such garbly gook:
No.xvart wrote:are you certain that there is no scum on your "alliance?"
No.xvart wrote: Conversely, does it matter if there are scum on your alliance?
Magic!Budja wrote:Surprised you find me town Zito.
I don't hate meta .