Lawls wrote:I haven't read other games that she has been in so I wouldn't know.
I'm going to multiply your opinion by the "relevance coefficient" then. Currently it's equal to the limit of 1/x as x -> infinity.
Panacea I don't see how my post isn't helping town, you tell me to post more I do, most my thoughts on players I do. Yet you still criticize me for not being helpful enough.
Your thoughts on players were the recycled, reworded, and logic-deprived thoughts of other players on those players.
Panacea wrote:Oh,
definitely
not. It may seem simple-minded, but I was honored. It made me really happy to be the N1 NK, because there was a chance it meant I was a threat to scum.
It was being NK'ed in that game that first woke me up to the thought that my talkative nature could actually be used to help.
Actually, I sort of understand. In my first game, a theme game, the mafia discussion (opened postgame) revealed that the mafia nightkilled me because they thought I was a cop. As I was a vanilla townie, this was a pretty good thing. And the town eventually won, so I did my part!
Oh, very. How could I not be? It's mentioned as scummy in every game I play. -.-
Well, some people don't have the time like I do to look through your games and find the patterns to the chattiness. So, they notice you've been scum fairly often, and they see a loose correlation between
your
chattiness and scuminess. Then they judge you via the general rule that spammy posting is hiding something, and the scuminess judgment is solidified. For what it's worth, I don't see it that way.
And these were unsatisfying? Why, if you don't mind my asking?
My first game was at a location infamous for clever, original roles and lots of flavor. I'd spent considerable time reading old games there before finally signing up. And then I was just a vanilla townie. It wasn't a huge disappointment, and, to be fair, I would have felt overwhelmed if I had had the responsibility of playing a town power role, but it began inculcating a sense of indifference to role PMs in me.
My first game here was as a mafia goon. Perhaps being in the know is less exciting because there's less mystery, but I don't recall being particularly thrilled about that role either.
At this point, I think I'd like to see what the vigilante fuss is all about, though obviously that can't happen in Newbie games. I'd like the chance to go directly from problem (scum detected) to solution (scum eliminated). You might ask why I'm playing a Newbie game...well, I still feel pretty lost trying to work through games, so I wanted to continue getting my feet wet before diving in.
I've only played with him as town, yes. I've read two of his scum games before, but it was for entertainment purposes. I intend to run a Ray-meta over the next two days. I can definitely tell you then.
I think that would be useful for several purposes. Some people have brought up the theory that you two might be working together...since I
have
read some of your and RayFrost's games, I'd be in a position to spot misrepresentations if they pop up.
Excellent!
Oh, and I'd like to add to the prospect of my being swayed by flattery, or whatever: Ray said I was obv town here. He's told me that before, when both of us were townies.
Good to know.
Mm, that's a good point... Maybe not. But it's not overly pro-town, either.
Fair enough.
@ Bridges: I don't think I ever addressed this, but it's been bothering me. When Acosmist had mentioned meta-ing me, you promptly asked him what were his conclusions. It's odd to me that you never did so yourself, or offered your own.
My gentle prods to people were apparently too subtle. I don't think anyone else is reading your games, which is fine, but making judgments about your quirky posting style without seeing how it's reflected your alignment in previous games is fruitless.
I made this post long to annoy Elementary Fermion.
Unvote; Vote: Lawls
. It looks like you're unhappy someone called you on your spammy, recycled "analysis" post.