responses in blue.
PaltryExcuse wrote:Ze Case on Light:
A) He doesn't participate unless you ask him questions directly or pressure him.
At the start of the game I asked him 2 questions to try and get some sort of opinion out of him. He didn't give any answers, and so I voted him. Then he starts responding...
[color=dark blue]So I'm suppose to say nothing when im pressured by a vote?[/color]
B) When he finally gives an opinion on something, it is extremely wishy-washy...No explanation needed. Just read.Light wrote:alright then paltryexcuse, i will get more involved. tbh the other mafia game i've been participating in seems much more interesting, which is why i've diverted a lot of my attention to it rather than split it 50-50.
I do not think Exedrin is scum, however i may be swayed to vote for him if evidence is presented.
Right now my 2 suspects are:
water_foul - this is just my intuition playing in, but i think we need to check him/her out more.
pwnman - lurking
[color=dark blue]?; So your basically thinking that my input is shit?[/color]
C) And it also targets the guy (pwnman) who has said NOTHING all game beyond responding to a prod and answering some RQS question.
This is disturbing because up until this point pwnman had said nothing, so it was a policy/easy lynch on the player with 3 votes at the time. Secondly, I would argue that Light was active lurking. It takes him less than a day to respond, however he still provides zilch.
[color=dark blue]I don't see how this is not a valid reason not to vote pwnman? He was lurking. When you say i'm "actively lurking", you realise that i have told you i did not pay too much attention to this because my other mafia game was much more interesting? Not some scum-thing you've got goign on in your head.[/color]
D) He alludes to giving an analysis in this post, and his defense is only "this is the way I play" and "town would suffer a mislynch".
He's defeatist and appeals to emotion. He then defends himself a couple more times without an analysis still. The pressure dies down on him (a.k.a Disco makes his 'Don ain't a mason remark') And then he pops in two days later to go on V/LA. The V/LA I can't dispute as being legit (and I'm not), but he had two days between his last post and the announcement of his V/LA to saySOMETHING.[color=dark blue]Light wrote:But not being open is also a shit thing.
My ease of being swayed? i said i could be swayed to vote for exedrin if enough evidence was presented. It wouldn't be "regardless of it's true merits" because im voting based on evidence presented.
So what would you have me do to prove my innocence then? be less ambiguous? Narhh, i play the way i play.You cannot change my core playstyle, i will always be open. always, regardless of faction.The defense of 'you don't know me'.
I also stated at page 7-8 that i would start paying more attention.Did you not conclude that i have yet to fully analyze the pages and posts before it?The promise of a future analysis.
If you believe me to be the scum, then vote me out. i have absolutely nothing to lose. However the town would have then suffered from a mislynch.Appeal to emotion.D) He alludes to giving an analysis in this post, and his defense is only "this is the way I play" and "town would suffer a mislynch". He's defeatist and appeals to emotion.I don't back down from a fight. Also lol; your right on the appeals to emotion; however i've been doing ti subconciously so lol. Since you are insistent on my analysing shit, give me shit to analyse then. [/color]
Overall: It's anti-town, and scummy to me. There is nothing good to be gleaned from this.
However, Light's V/LA is also why I want to know if we're going to be assuming that the (new?) mod is going to extend the day (or we're going to say s/he is going to due to extenuating circumstances). I want at least an answer before the end of the day, but if Light can't get on in time... my vote is on a guy who can't defend in time which sucks.