Pick Your Power - Game. Set. Match.

[Budja]

vote: Fishy

, because bandwagons are good.

[Budja]

^ I agree with EK above.

@BC, I still think context matters here. There probably is scum on the Fishy wagon just by probability anyway.

[Budja]

Freudian slip? do you mean the seacore wagon?

Yeah, the aquatic theme must have tripped me up there .

vi's pre-emptive vig direction ticks my scumdar. as an experienced player, Vi should know that random death helps town.

But if the vig is scum, thats an extra (non-random) mafia kill.

[Budja]

^This, for the framer anyway.

[Budja]

^bad idea.
Bulletproof is much better unknown as is bomb. This just helps scum.

unvote, vote Seacore

(not just for this obv.)

[Budja]

Simulpost there.

Seacore's idea = bad.

[Budja]

@Vi, SC's idea was good (I nearly chose Framer myself to stop scum getting it, or to narrow down the players who did).
Seacore's expansion of the idea was bad.

[Budja]

I disagree about Tony. I have had very simular lines of thought, especially re. Framer.
I agree with Cobalt.

unvote, vote DGB

[Budja]

Yeah, I can see anything vote-worthy with Elvis TBH.

FoS Dram, BC

, seriously guys, that's ok in the RVS but not now.

[Budja]

EBWOP: can't

[Budja]

Because Cobalt's vote was just unexplained, Dran/BC's vote were explicitly clueless following.

[Budja]

Cobalt isn't scum.

unvote

vote Dramonic

EK, BC are a rung below.

[Budja]

Well, I have played with dramonic too and this behaviour isn't too far-fetched for him to do but I still think he deserves a vote.

[Budja]

EK's attack on Cobalt looked pretty false to me.
We had already covered that ground.
That was the change.

[Budja]

*jumped on at the peak of the Fishy wagon (for what it's worth) and tried to say "oh there may already be scum on this three-person wagon"

1. I meant seacore not fishy as I corrected later.
2. I tried to say "BC, your theory is wrong, their probably is scum on the wagon by only by probability." 7 people had voted.

*jumped on at the peak of the Seacore wagon (seventh vote) for unsatisfying reasons

They were better reasons that the ones which started the whole wagon IMO.

*jumped on at the peak of the Goofball wagon (fourth vote) piggybacking on Cobalt's reason

Yes I did, is this really a bad thing?

*just now laid an egg on dramonic for laughable reasons

Clueless bandwagonning = scummy is a good enough reason for me.

And I would like to know what changed between this post and this post re: elvis_knits.

The case on EK mostly sucks but her reaction didn't feel very townie and I disliked the Cobalt attack. I'm believing the claim now.

---

Still happy with dram ATM.

[Budja]

@Seacore, both are true, neither are lies. I voted for you for both. The second part I pointed out was just a stronger tell IMO.

[Budja]

Which is it?

I think EK's cop outburst was townish. (I will admit my opinions are flipflopping a bit ATM)

---

DGB is not entirely logical , but I don't feel any scum motivation here.

[Budja]

I'm not absent, just a little overwhelmed.

---

Xyl is a bit scummy (I dislike the word choice thing with DGB) but Dramonic/BC are both a lot better choices.

[Budja]

@Plum, Budja-weak = Budja-lost/confused not Budja-scum.
Now a reread to rectify that.

[Budja]

Ok, I looked at the past couple of pages.

I agree with DGB 421/422. I disagree with Xyl.
Vi 424 makes a good point about Cobalts OMGUS against Fishy. Not really so townie . I think this will solve itself, not for a Cobalt lynch.

Devotress's recent vote/posting seems more town-motivated. I think I feel a bit like Crucaire on this. A little gut-scummy but posts seem reasonable. Not a good lynch.

DGB is not scum any more. I'm liking her recent posts.

@Xyl 451, I still don't get the reasons behind the EK wagon, but I don't think she reacted well but the claim felt townie. That is what I meant.

Xyl's attack of DGB is overplaying a null tell on word-choice. Still dislike this. On a reread Xyl is promoted to scum #3.

In post 455, Dram explains why he is scum #1.

Iffy on SC. Seems like his regular play to me.

And BC is still #2 fyi.

[Budja]

I agree with all who say Benmage's answer sucks and Devotress's unvote sucks.

I dislike Cobalt's vote for Deathnote. Any reason for that vote at all?

unvote, vote BC

, noone else seems that interested in voting dram.

[Budja]

Semi-V/LA until the 26th.

[Budja]

Bulletproof should certainly not claim but I'm not feeling SC-scum either.

vote BC

[Budja]

I see no advantage in lynching EK regardless of alignment. We have a resource here who is extremely unlikely to make near endgame and can help us. We lose nothing by keeping her around.
---
Ironically, Devotress makes the most compelling case against EK no far. I like your analysis there.
---
BC fails to convince me at all.

[Budja]

I've been far too lax with this game.
I'm had a busier time than I thought.

Expect a post within 12-24hrs.

[Budja]

My 2c for now.

With DGB going on about the watcher, I think we are likely to catch scum or have a scum-watcher. [/speculation]
---
I suspect scum can daytalk with EK's slip. Xyl scumtalk theory with DGB gets cred.

More reading...

[Budja]

Last thoughts:
I take DGB to be Elvis's partner. Xyl had a good point, scum as he is.
The big caps about the watcher was a good warning to stop her from been NKed.
---
Anyway, your wish is my command.
hammer

vote Xyl

[Budja]

Feh, someone else can hammer then.
@chamber, if seacore lied, he dies tomorrow anyway.

[Budja]

Farside's 1168 is very good.
Also note the day-talk slips by both DGB and EK. Xyl-scum was also the one who originally noticed this link.

vote DGB

---

I can't see the Chamber case. Not helpful but not scummy.
I still dislike BC but I've kind-of forgotten why . Going to reread and make sure I'm not mixing feelings from another game.

[Budja]

Ha, simuled Cobalt .

[Budja]

^ bad idea.
Tracker basically = cop at this stage.

Could someone point out where Chamber claimed?

[Budja]

Must I really have to claim my result right away .

DGB targeted SC last night.
Chamber targeted noone the night before. (prob town IMO)
Vi targeted noone.