#288
Actually, I need to think about this. I've only ever seen a jailkeeper live past N1 in one game, and it turned out to win the game for town.
This seems like a weird reason to unvote. I know you had other reasons to unvote that you could have said,but why did you pick this one?
#299
vollkan wrote:
Makes perfect sense. Sure, it doesn't count for much at all, since scum is very very unlikely to target a claimed miller, but it's legit, if not very powerful.
Scum will never target a miller. Find me even one case where it has happened. No town protective role is wisely spent on a miller. There are virtually no roles worse than a miller. No other town power is well used on a miller.
The problem with that which makes this case utter rubbish (unless I've missed some important fact) is that there's nothing proving he's a jailkeeper in the first place. We practically have to trust him and hope for that he's town.
Also,
ABR seemed like a really good choice because it eliminates lots of possibility for collateral damage because:
1. No investigative role is going to waste their time with ABR. I get to avoid blocking results
2. If he was scum, obviously, he might have sent in the NK and be blocked (this is partially why I was resistant to the lynch, though he probably wasn't going to send in the kill anyway even if he did live)
I'm not really getting you're resistant to a lynch of a scum. Why would you not want to try to lynch a scum because you block him? You don't even have to worry about a kill at all if he's gone. (Also, you could say that you might have wanted to focus on the vollkan bandwagon, but there was barely any evidence stacked against him).