Welcome back. I'm going to be gone until saturday as well with no access. Don't kill youselves while I'm gone
Green Crayons - 1 (Empking)
Mizzy
Ether
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch!
I'm the smart one.Green Crayons wrote:The similiarity between crywolf's and myk's pictures will now cause immense confusion when I skim the thread.
Boo. Both of you. Boo.
Also:You aren't exactly helping the cause.myk wrote:oh, sure. It is not like anyone here is very active, so waiting is not such a big deal.
So you think that the totality of scum is only two and therefore don't want to look elsewhere where scum might be just in case if 1) you are town (which I'm not too sure of) and 2) you get killed before you can voice/explain additional suspicions you may have?myk wrote:and I rather wait for some reasonable input I can react on then to do nothing except to decide between empking and fuzzy.
I read myk's post as saying "I'd rather wait for input than decide between emp and fuzzy" but I could be wrong. Grammar does change everything.Green Crayons wrote:So you think that the totality of scum is only two and therefore don't want to look elsewhere where scum might be just in case if 1) you are town (which I'm not too sure of) and 2) you get killed before you can voice/explain additional suspicions you may have?myk wrote:and I rather wait for some reasonable input I can react on then to do nothing except to decide between empking and fuzzy.
That's the only reason I can think of as to why you believe the only thing you can do at this time is to decide between emp and fuzz and wait for others to speak up. I didn't know conversing about other suspicions was antithetical to getting activity to liven up.
He didn't just say that, he said all he could do was either wait upon other player's imput so he could react to that imput, or decide between Emp and Fuzz (which he already has decided, putting himself behind an Emp lynch). While bemoaning the lack of activity in this thread.Mizzy wrote:I read myk's post as saying "I'd rather wait for input than decide between emp and fuzzy" but I could be wrong. Grammar does change everything.
Post 484, Fuzzyman wrote:As y'all have probably figured out, I'm willing to go to Simp if we're deadlined.
Fuzzyman picked up his flak in the first place because he kept edging out of the Simpwagon in shady ways...it's fairly obvious that that's not the direction he was hoping to go in.Post 564, Mykonian (emphasis mine) wrote:k) 484: states he alsowants tolynch simpor (do you really think we don't know that you don't care who is the lynch, as long it is not you?)
I think my track record is secretly below average. I'm just really good at making sense.Post 717, Canary wrote:Ether is an above average scum hunter. She is obvtown.
I´m afraid I don´t completely understand what you are saying. I don´t see the point you try to make with that completed game, I know what game you are talking about. Also, I don´t know what "bloated" and "egregiously" mean, so I'm not getting what the problem is with that point against fuzzy. It is just one of the more points that show some kind of pattern that fuzzy was always able to go onto the biggest bandwagon, that he always kept his options open. And about corporate... well do you know what to make of him? I don't. Do you want a policy lynch? On the moment, I think there are better options, scummier people.Ether wrote:Prod acknowledged.
Filtered Mykonian in some completed newbie game; was annoyed to find that he seems to be competent as scum. (I'm horrible at filter metas; when I say "competent as scum," I mean, "cares enough about a game to bump it when it's inactive." Hey, I can't do that myself.) Regardless of Fuzzyman's alignment, it bugs me the degree to which he bloated up the case on Fuzzyman in 564. Most egregiously:
Post 484, Fuzzyman wrote:As y'all have probably figured out, I'm willing to go to Simp if we're deadlined.Fuzzyman picked up his flak in the first place because he kept edging out of the Simpwagon in shady ways...it's fairly obvious that that's not the direction he was hoping to go in.Post 564, Mykonian (emphasis mine) wrote:k) 484: states he alsowants tolynch simpor (do you really think we don't know that you don't care who is the lynch, as long it is not you?)
Not wild about his behavior around Corporate, either.
In post 639, I thought I showed what my reasoning behind the unvote was, but that fuzzy stayed on my list. I like it better when people are active, even if I think they are scum.Empking's case on Canary and debate with Fuzzyman still make my eyes blur over. Oh, well. I'm assuming Fuzzyman's defenses of Canary are what prompted Mykonian's unvote in 635. This immediately makes me think to Canary's conclusion that Fuzzyman was aiding him superfluously. Part of me worries that I'm just nodding along at this hour...like I said, I barely followed the Empking/Fuzzyman exchange myself. Eh. I want Mykonian to elaborate on what he liked. (I acknowledge his 639.)