yorgi wrote:I'm asking how voting for himself gains him sympathy, and why that only gives scum sympathy and not town. You still didn't explain this, please do. You saying it gains sympathy doesn't make it true. How is wanting to stop pressure on oneself any indicator of alignment? I don't think that he stopped pressure, he took quite a bit of flack for voting himself in fact.
He self voted to get to L-1 saying the BW was stupid. He has now stopped the backlash for the most part by doing that vote and now getting the it's null to self vote. BS!
self voting is not null I can count the number of times I votes myself and was scum.
Me too. Zero. Now that I think about it, I've only self voted as town. Looks like it must be a towntell then!
farside wrote:Saying look this case is such BS I'm self voting did exactly what he wanted which was stop pressure.
Yes, and how is wanting to stop pressure on oneself indicitive of scum and not town? I don't want pressure on me regardless of alignment.
farside, you are dodging all of my (scumhunting) questions, and not doing a good job of it at all either.
charter bold mine wrote:farside22 wrote:I think self voting when he did and saying it's town is terrible thing to say. It's not a null thing in my view. The are very, very few times I vote for self and
I can see scum doing it to gain sympathy.
You perceive it as a scumtell (as do most people I reckon), but you think scum would do it anyway to gain sympathy? How is committing a commonly accepted scumtell supposed to give scum sympathy? And how does it just give scum sympathy and not townies?
I would like direct answers to these questions please.
You tell me how self voting gains him sympathy as scum but can't give him sympathy as town.
farside wrote:You called me scum. That equals scummy. Wording a bit different but not by much. You being a grammar police now?
No, I'm trying to show that you're completely twisting the actual facts. Scum twist facts.
FACT - In my first post, I decreed three people scum and one a SK.
FACT - I gave ZERO reasoning for any of that.
FACT - You accuse me of saying one of your ideas is scummy.
FACT - I never said that idea was scummy. (I've already gotten over the fact that you made it up for me, now I want to know why) In fact, I didn't even read it, just saw a large chuck of text, and skipped it.
QUESTION - Why did you accuse me of thinking your idea was scummy, when I never said it was?
FACT - No one else I decreed scum or SK thought twice (or even acknowledged) my post.
CONJECTURE - farside is incredibly jumpy, and takes to being called scum MUCH more seriously than I think is warrented. I think she is scum.
(I very much like posting like that, I think I will do it more often)