if you can, please write exactly how it was given to you.
i'm just curious on this subject because I received the role w/ alice's note last game and i know there's a lot of trickery involved in it.
in MS 2, the role name Tarhalindur was also a role (NatirashaSK)forbiddanlight wrote:No, actually, I died because I posted within the first 17 posts. If 17 posts had passed before I did that, I also would have died. Essentially, I just wanted to misdirect people so if they decided to lynch Tar I wouldn't get lynched (Wasn't sure if votes for Tar counted as votes for me)
Didnt' you die doing that last time?
MS 1, Tarhalindur was a role in the game
MS 2, Tarhalindur was both a role in the game and he was a player (Chairman Mao). I think he was town aligned though, or at least self aligned
MS 3. I would not be surprised if Tarhalindur were scum.
why? especially considering Mind Screw 2populartajo wrote:When something strange happens, the first thing I think is scum.farside22 wrote:Why assume scum first with that type of power?populartajo wrote:Regarding the votes. Im thinking scum had to send some fixed votes and FOSes to people for confirming.
the quote tool at the upper right corner of the post is very helpful you knowforbiddanlight wrote:I'll try, but don't expect me to remember all the time.dahill wrote: forbiddan can you write in who you're quoting?
sorry if it's just me, but it is MUCH easier to read and follow the game that way
I don't think that's what happened, but we'll see.poptaj wrote:
FL just lost a FOS and somehow transmited it to Tarh.
hmm...Tarhalindur wrote:The Second Vote Count (aka the "Every FoS Has an Equal And Opposite..." Vote Count)
was made by another player speaking through Tar, and not Tar himself. i definitely want to see more of this before anyone goes through with a Tar lynchTarhalindur wrote:StrangerCoug wrote:Let's try it, shall we?Kairyuu wrote:Vote: Tar
FOS: Tar
I suggest we wagon this to an actual majority, since in the lat two games there was information available to the players if they did so.
Unvote: Context
Vote: Tarhalindur
FoS: Tarhalindur
I actually have to start talking now.
Don't lynch him, you'll lynch me if you do.
i agree. the PR is that it seems like he can only mimic others. i'm not very skeptical of it atm, since qwints is relatively new and i don't think he'd have the ballz to fake this kind of PR (no offense to qwints). either way, this type of PR can still express their suspicions i guess through echoing others peoples' thoughts. definitely shouldn't be lynched just for the PR, maybe vigged at the mostStrangerCoug wrote:Knowing what to expect, I'm wary of policy-lynching qwints just because of his post restriction.
it was part of lain's roleTarhalindur wrote:If you're talking about Lain,
Didn't Tar say the last time that he only had Lain "die"
because of the Mini Theme queue?
can't elaborate due to role? or just don't want to?Tarhalindur wrote:Also, there is an ability out there that is presumably from scum
that is really annoying me.
Can't elaborate. Sorry.
i see no reason not to lynch you if you plan on not participating..Tarhalindur wrote:Don't expect me to say much.
Not my style. Not this game.
i don't think some of the other people on the wagon share your opinion.Caboose wrote:Yeah, the Tar bandwagon was a joke. Why do we need to waste our D1 lynch on it?DrippingGoofball wrote:Brilliant observation.dahill1 wrote:was made by another player speaking through Tar, and not Tar himself. i definitely want to see more of this before anyone goes through with a Tar lynch
I don't know who Tar channels, but I hope we'll have enough material to make a collective decision on that player's alignment. We might still need to lynch "Tar" at some point but it would be wise to lay off.
nope, but lots of interesting information has been coming in the past page which can definitely help us. also, like half the people haven't even checked in yetXylthixlm wrote:Do you have a better lynch candidate right now?dahill1 wrote:useless people in such a large game like this don't need to be lynched. hopefully, there's some sort of vig to off him. no need to waste a lynchXylthixlm wrote:Stop focusing on how he possibly could be useful in the future and start focusing on how he definitely isn't being useful now.
do you think the person posting via Tar is town, and if so why?Caboose wrote:Yes.Xylthixlm wrote:Do you have a better lynch candidate right now?dahill1 wrote:useless people in such a large game like this don't need to be lynched. hopefully, there's some sort of vig to off him. no need to waste a lynchXylthixlm wrote:Stop focusing on how he possibly could be useful in the future and start focusing on how he definitely isn't being useful now.
FL has been trying to get the mod lynched for real, which I find to be pretty scummy, considering that it will probably waste the D1 lynch.
Unvote
Vote: Forbiddanlight
good answer. i wasn't sure what you meant at first by being interested in the setup but now i see, so thanks for elaborating. on that noteTehVariable wrote:Information Instead of Analysis. But now I see pretty much everyone is doing it, which is understandable. She just seemed to lead it off.Dahill wrote:how is being interested in the setup relate to scumminess?TehVariable wrote:forbiddanlight seems really interested in the set up...while that's ok for now, if it continues it might be suspicious.
Um...hmm...from what I recall from skimming MS 2, there was a similar role to the apparent one that is speaking through the mod now. But there are differences it seems. I guess we should probably pay close attention to what they say.
Also, if forbiddanlight claiming the mod is a player is true, then it's possible Tar is using MS 2 to, for all intents and purposes mind screw us.
Either way...not entirely sure we should be voting the mod even if the history shows it yielding information. Even if the supposed dead mod speaking person is Tar himself, it probably is a waste of a D1 lynch.
Not sure what to make of qwints' apparent post restriction...and attempting to guess the role probably won't help us. I guess we'll garner what information we can from what he says.
what does this mean? do you think that person who is making the posts via Tar (excluding the VCs and such), is actually Tar?Caboose wrote:I always trust the mod.dahill wrote:@caboose: why on earth are you trusting someone that easily this early?
.....Caboose wrote:It could be, it could not be. I'm not sure yet. I guess that's where the mind-screw comes in.
woah woah. never said i wanted him alive, necessarily. just that we shouldn't waste the lynch on himVi wrote:qwints' PR is still beyond what I can see so far though, though I have some ideas. I agree that leaving him alive is probably the best thing that can be done right now.
i think you are bluffing in expressing doubt that Tar isn't being controlled by someone. also, you blatantly trust that person for no real reason. i think there's a possibility that Tar (the player) is scum and you're trying to redirect the lynch. this is because of Tar's additional WC which seems uncommon for town, his avoidance of my questions, hiding his votes for no reason (incredibly easy way to "accidentally" hammer btw since there are so many hidden votes going around), and asking for an unwarranted character claimCaboose wrote:What's with the vote?dahill wrote:the person making those posts with tar is obviously not him, and i don't think you are this dense.
unvote vote caboose
have you been reading the last 4 pages?BlakAdder wrote:I don't know. Three-quarters gut, one-quarter random vote.
Caboose wrote:So you want to lynch Tar* on aBlakAdder wrote:I don't know. Three-quarters gut, one-quarter random vote.gut?
Seriously?
Unvote
Vote: BlakAdder
*or person behind Tar
hmTarhalindur wrote:Voting in thread takes *space*. *Space* is limited near-term and far-term. If I cannot vote privately, I WILL NOT VOTE.dahill1 wrote:another question for tar-person:
1) why do you plan on keeping your votes secret? how does this benefit the town?
Unvote.
Revealing reason negates request.also, you can't honestly expect us to trust you enough for some of us to character claim based on your word alone, can you? for all we know, your WC could be "kill all characters from this show, etc."
List all questions in one post, please. DO NOT EXPECT ME ANSWER FURTHER QUESTIONS PROMPTLY. Already lost great deal of *space*, and this is first real-life day. No *space*, no answers.
Notes on role given strength of wagon: I am Sagara Sousuke. Wincon: survivor-town (town must win and I must survive). Ultimate gives latent abilities, condition: <4 scum left. One other ability, one drawback from other player. Cannot elaborate.
Cannot defend effectively. Too little *space*. Finite.
i believe these were my main points:veerus wrote:I know you've already unvoted.. but:
dahill1 wrote:actually that last post just made me realize that i want a Tar lynch more than a caboose one
unvote vote tartaste of your own medicine :pdahill1 wrote:care to explain why?
dahill1 wrote:this is because of Tar's additional WC which seems uncommon for town, his avoidance of my questions, hiding his votes for no reason (incredibly easy way to "accidentally" hammer btw since there are so many hidden votes going around), and asking for an unwarranted character claim
what do you mean by this?Context wrote:Bugger...Kinetic wrote:Vote:Quints
Are you allowed to respond when someone votes you depending on what they say. If so, please respond to bananas.
Fos:Quints
Are you allowed to respond when someone FOSes you depending on what they say. If so, please respond to apples.
That's me.
>>
what makes you so sure that scum can't have PRs?The Central Scrutinizer wrote: :words:
Vote: Caboose
unless i'm wrong, neither qwints nor xyl has claimed a power role so i'm a little confused by this question.ZazieR wrote:Dahill, what do you think of Xyl voting someone as he has a powerrole which could be useless later on?
seriously this is why i voted you first. i knew would do something so fucking stupid like this.. *sigh*Empking wrote:Claim; Survivor
Vote: FL
Vote: Caboose
so you won't because populartajo doesn't want you to? and explain why you think the first 5 pages are uselessness.Empking wrote:[I don't think Pop wants me to claim.
FoS: All the people that posted before page 5, for making five pages of uselessness
agreein' wit disXylthixlm wrote:Survivor claim is utterly stupid and I am perfectly willing to lynch Empking for it.
is this sarcastic? think about this question carefully..populartajo wrote:We're going to lynch a claimed survivor D1? Really?
how do you know he's not scumpopulartajo wrote:Id rather lynch scum today, right?
you should probably elaborate on this because i reallllly want to lynch empking right nowAries777777 wrote:vote:stef
empking is, from my understanding being victimized, plus his role is mentioned in my pm, as being a good person, i vote for stef simply through there severe dis like of empking, for no real reason
....qwints wrote:OK. So the people who thought I was faking are correct - I was trying to activate my ultimate.
does it say in your role pm that he is confirmed town?Aries777777 wrote:i am told he his character (i cant remember how to spell it ) is a person i can talk to out side of the game chat, and him only, i doubt the host would allow a townie to talk with a mafia person in confidenceStef wrote:How exactly is he mentioned in your PM?
QFTPesco47 wrote:Things don't add up on this end. Especially if we're taking it that Empking is survivor.
first off who is shanki? second you can talk at all times with him?Aries777777 wrote:i re read my role pm, and it specifics that i can only speak outside of the thread with him if i find out who he is, however he admitted he was shanki earlier, so its more i could chat outside with him if i wanted, but i cant presently, im not sure if its known as a mason connection, as in theory i have to choose him to speak to him
why didn't you just claim mason and leave out who the partner was?Empking wrote:I claimed survivor to get my ultimate. I said that before.
Yes, I am a mason with Aeris. I didn't say so because I didn't want to out him/her.
Empking wrote:Wait.Aries777777 wrote:i think A is probably the better description, my target has been processed anyway, it said it will resolve at an appropriate time, i dont know whether im getting feedback or not, is that approval or not? im not sure if i can talk to him out of chat yet or whether i need to wait to find out if hes telling the truth....
so? wasn't the reason you claimed in the first place to get your ultimate? why would you listen to just one person if you would have received the ultimate?Empking wrote:He was the only one that made it clear, that he didn't want me to claim.DrippingGoofball wrote:SO why did you say that populartajo in particular wouldn't want you to claim???Empking wrote:I claimed survivor to get my ultimate. I said that before.
Yes, I am a mason with Aeris. I didn't say so because I didn't want to out him/her.
so empking is the SK?Aries777777 wrote:i am infact, the towns psychologistXylthixlm wrote:I think Aries is a variation on the "traitor" role with a role PM worded to sound like a seeking mason.Empking wrote:So do you think Aeris is a seeking mason for a scum?
he probably won't get modkilled unless he c/p's the exact text or quotes the role PM. either way, he should probably run the claim through the mod before posting itContext wrote:With his experience I think he's going to get himself mod-killed if he does this. He will mess it up.dahill1 wrote:IMO, aries should claim his full role (excluding ultimate) to clear this up
i find this post to be scummy. how about instead of waiting for others to posts cases for you to follow, you do one yourself? active lurking ftw..TehVariable wrote:hrn...these deaths are confusing. Aries and forbiddanlight were not paragons of towniness. And as per usual Mind Screw practice, the role names tell very little.
Also...in the rush to kill empking, very little information could be garnered :S. I think right now I just have to wait for the rush of posts.
scum tend to overplay this type of mindset. "aah i'm soooo confused guys.." and just glide along as such through the game. alsoBlakAdder wrote:Wait, so was Empking a Jester and a Supersaint?
Oh wait, that's right, Mind Screw...
what do you think of my proposition on voting for tar? (that goes for everyone else voting for tar too)Electra wrote:I've been pretty here.XSilentSinX wrote:Have StrangerCoug, Electra or Vi been on at any point in this game?
vote: Tarhalindur
I'm certain that if we WIFOM ourselves out of killing Tar, then that's the wrong choice.
Although he may have anticipated that we would lynch him, he would need to balance things the other way as well - that is, it can't be game breaking in a negative way if we do lynch him. And then he could have also assumed that we'd be on the wrong side of WIFOM, and not lynch him.
I don't find quints suspicious for the fake restriction, at least not yet. Seems not like something scum would want to do.
I am 90% sure that it's a player not Tar. Do you honestly think the mod (that knows the setup) would give himself a vote?ShadowGirl wrote:Alright, will do - I most certainly didn't expect the day to end within the oh so many hours it was.
The thing on Tar is... pretty WIFOM-ish. Would he put a player in charge so that we would be least likely to lynch him? Should we just treat him like a normal player, and just consider it a 'regular' PR? I'm just wondering if the Tar thing has any more.... mechanics added onto his lynch? (Ill made sentence, bah...)
sorry i guess i worded my stance poorlyShadowGirl wrote:I mean, not that it's Tar, but whether something... will happen specifically because of his lynch. (I very much believe it's a player speaking through him.)
BlakAdder wrote:Sorry, I'm here.vote: Pacman281292(qwints)
Is there anything scummy about me besides opportunism?
...BlakAdder wrote:Not really. Meta me. It's not abnormal for me to play like this.
what do you mean by this? so far he hasn't even posted in the thread iirc so there's no way on judging him. also apparently he can't post (?)veerus wrote:Looks like you win.. the question now is -- is he scummy?
little cautious there aren't you?Be careful not to hammer Blakadder so quickly.. we already ended one day really fast.. we should spend some more time before ending this one just as quickly.