Well at least I'm on the top.
Mini 672 - Tranquility (Game Over)
-
-
Lord Gurgi Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: March 26, 2004
-
-
Lord Gurgi Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: March 26, 2004
Kmd4390 wrote:
Ok, I just didn't like the use of definites.SpyreX wrote: Is this gonna be one of those awesomesauce semantic arguments? Of course I can only think you're scum. However, my internal scales of scum vs town on you have fell over due to the weight on the scum side. Unless something changes, I have every reason to believe you are scum.
Of course not. It's ongoing.SpyreX wrote: Always. I hope you're not asking for meta. I dont do meta.
Don't just give him a free ride. I'm ok with not discussing him the way we have been, just don't forget him to the point where he can sit back and watch.SpyreX wrote:
As for the Rishi issue - lets just drop it for now. We're not going to budge and time will tell.
Ok.SpyreX wrote: Pressure votes are useful in limited circumstance. I've made it clear I dont like Camn's play in regards to the voting. You know the answers to these questions.
No, not tunnel vision. I have other suspicions, and I have said who they are. I'm going to push my number one choice though.SpyreX wrote:
OMG TUNNELLL VISION (Notice the sarcasm at the fact Rishi calls me out on this when we've got you right here -if I didn't think you were scum I wouldn't have a problem with focusing on your main case).
Oh, and the bolded part... So it's ok for town to do this, but because you think I am scum, you are going to use it against me? And in the same post that you accuse ME of tunnel vision?
Please don't point out things like this in the future.Porkens wrote: THIS is what I would call 'soft-claming.'
1. CamnNameless wrote: I'm going to request that those players not voting please start doing so, and those who are voting start considering who else they're willing to have lynched.
2. Porkens
3. NamelessHE SIMULPOSTED ME SO I REPOSTED IT HERE BECAUSE I REALLY WANT THE TOPLast edited by Lord Gurgi on Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.(11:26:07 PM) thesheamuffin: I'm counting gurgi because I would probably make out with him if I were drunk enough-
-
melikefood Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 294
- Joined: June 7, 2008
-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
PS... I gotta go out.. so
### Vote : Charter
For Pressure.
Heh. I thought about leaving it at that
But also because his attacks on Porkens are crap-case at best. . . but even though that case sucks, it is still 10 times as complete as his "case" (or lack thereof) on Nameless, where his vote lies.
He has hardly mentioned Nameless today, yet lets the vote ride.
Also, truly, maybe some pressure will get him back in the Game.
And Charter.. before you say it, its not OMGUS. I know I am on your list.. but you are the LEAST of my problems. If I was prone to OMGUS votes, I would be voting KMD right now"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
melikefood Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 294
- Joined: June 7, 2008
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
-
-
Nameless Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 525
- Joined: May 5, 2008
- Location: Bravely adventuring beyond the fourth wall.
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Here we go again...camn wrote:### Vote : Charter
For Pressure.
Why is the case on Porkens crap?camn wrote:
But also because his attacks on Porkens are crap-case at best. . . but even though that case sucks, it is still 10 times as complete as his "case" (or lack thereof) on Nameless, where his vote lies.
He has hardly mentioned Nameless today, yet lets the vote ride.
Very true.camn wrote:
If I was prone to OMGUS votes, I would be voting KMD right now
If you think someone is soft claiming a power role, you don't have to tell the scum that. Chances are you're wrong anyway.Porkens wrote: why?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I don't agree. I don't think the minority is going to 'miss' that. It stood out like a blinking red light for me. You want me to bank on the idea that all the majority sees it but the minority doesn't?Kmd wrote:
If you think someone is soft claiming a power role, you don't have to tell the scum that. Chances are you're wrong anyway.Porkens wrote:
why?
So what am I probably wrong about? That he's softclaiming? It isn't even subtle;
Going from meta to "oh I HAVE my reasons, but we shouldn't talk about them (except for here where I am talking about them)" is a matter that needs adressing as soon as possible. I'm not asking for a hard claim, but, as Spy said, yes you need to elaborate NOW THAT YOU HAVE BROUGHT IT UP.Rishi wrote: As for flipping on my opinion of melikefood, I told you that I did a meta-read on him. There may be other reasons why I might have had a change of position on melikefood. Think about it and let me know if you still want this question answered.
Finally, KMD; Why didn't you call out SpyreX when he said that I was soft-claiming?-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
We were all over Stormer for asking about a cop. He was very obvious about it, but other than that, it's the same thing. I don't see why you would mention any power role discussion at all. Just because you saw it doesn't mean the rest of us did too. Maybe the scum saw it, maybe they missed it. Either way, we can be sure that they saw you bring it up.Porkens wrote:
I don't agree. I don't think the minority is going to 'miss' that. It stood out like a blinking red light for me. You want me to bank on the idea that all the majority sees it but the minority doesn't?
My honest answer would affect the town in a negative way.Porkens wrote: Finally, KMD; Why didn't you call out SpyreX when he said that I was soft-claiming?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
It's not the same thing. In Stormer's case, no one implied anything to warrent a question, he just blurted it out.We were all over Stormer for asking about a cop. He was very obvious about it, but other than that, it's the same thing. I don't see why you would mention any power role discussion at all. Just because you saw it doesn't mean the rest of us did too. Maybe the scum saw it, maybe they missed it. Either way, we can be sure that they saw you bring it up.
In this situation, I don't think taking the fifth is going to help the majority.My honest answer would affect the town in a negative way.-
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- Posts: 18596
- Joined: April 24, 2008
@KMD:
I worded that poorly. If I didn't think your case was invalid and a scum-tactic, I wouldn't have called you out for focusing on your main case. You have said other positions.Oh, and the bolded part... So it's ok for town to do this, but because you think I am scum, you are going to use it against me? And in the same post that you accuse ME of tunnel vision?
Dont assume the scum are illiterate. Thats exactly what I thought it was and why I want more explanation. See your awesome:If you think someone is soft claiming a power role, you don't have to tell the scum that. Chances are you're wrong anyway.
Thats more of this awesome soft claiming.My honest answer would affect the town in a negative way.-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Announcing to the majority also announces to the minority in case you didn't notice that. If you think it's a fake softclaim in order to look town, go after him for it. If you really think he is softclaiming a power roles, I see no reason to mention it. Keep it in mind, but don't announce it.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Kmd4390 wrote:Announcing to the majority also announces to the minority in case you didn't notice that.
I don't think a real power role would hint at his role in that manner. I think he was building a crap case and din't have the information/energy to support it. So I am following your advice and going after him.Kmd4390 wrote:If you think it's a fake softclaim in order to look town, go after him for it.
Obv. fair enough.Kmfd wrote:If you really think he is softclaiming a power roles, I see no reason to mention it. Keep it in mind, but don't announce it.-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ok. Why do you think he would use a fake softclaim to protect Food? Do you think they are scum together? Do you think he is trying to look like town to Food? Do you think he expects Food to be lynched,knows Food is town, and wants to use it after Food flips?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.