Mafia 79 - "The Amish Mafia" GAME OVER... WHO WON?

[mr. incrediball]

i am posting to firm my con.

[mr. incrediball]

it begins...

vote: valiantvaliant

on the basis that it's the only name i remember right now.

[mr. incrediball]

I have a hunch VV is just an overactive player due to his sickness. I will

Vote: ValiantValant

and when he gets well from his sickness (I'm sick but getting better at the moment) I will maybe think about removing my vote.

wuh?

defending vv, and then voting him? you're making no sense, my friend, and i have a feeling you're just trying to cover all your bases...

unvote: VV vote: Mellowed man

oh, and can someone explain what bussing means?

[mr. incrediball]

last time i checked, WIFOM was used by the mafia to confuse the town... or have i got the whole thing wrong?

major fos: ZS

[mr. incrediball]

It works neither way- the principle is 'lynch the person with the best case against them.' You'll rarely PROVE anything, and to suggest as such is scummy.

There

is,

in fact, a thing called confirmed town. But you're right, that's not usually the case.

it's not easy to confirm a town without revealing some power roles.

[mr. incrediball]

It works neither way- the principle is 'lynch the person with the best case against them.' You'll rarely PROVE anything, and to suggest as such is scummy.

There

is,

in fact, a thing called confirmed town. But you're right, that's not usually the case.

it's not easy to confirm a town without revealing some power roles.

No, it's not. In fact, it rarely happens without outing an investigative role. There are some cases where someone's pretty much confirmed, as in counterclaiming a RB in an all-RB setup, before the setup is known. But I feel you're implying that I want to a power role to reveal itself. Is that so?

i imply nothing, my friend. simply pointing out a downside to confirms.

[mr. incrediball]

o.k, zombieslayer agrees with his own lynch there,

unvote vote zs

.

[mr. incrediball]

Note: I never, ever claim. All claiming does is make people think you are desperate and trying to get out of a lynch.

wrong, wrong, wrong. everybody claims at l-1. in fact, refusing to claim is scummier, as it hints that you want to keep your role from the town.

[mr. incrediball]

Note: I never, ever claim. All claiming does is make people think you are desperate and trying to get out of a lynch.

wrong, wrong, wrong. everybody claims at l-1. in fact, refusing to claim is scummier, as it hints that you want to keep your role from the town.

Claiming always makes you seem desperate. Saying "IMMA COP! DUN LYNCH ME!" is just going to make people think you are saying that so they will not lynch you.

and saying "look, i'm not gonna claim, but you really shouldn't lynch me" makes you look like a dumbass mafia who can't think of a fakeclaim. or a jester.

[mr. incrediball]

Amish Mafia votecount 1-3

Korts: babygirl86, Surye
Valiant Valant: ashmite84
nswhorse: The Fonz
Mellowed Man: Korts, mr. incrediball, ZombieSlayer54
Celebloki: Erratus Apathos
Erratus Apathos: nswhorse
ZombieSlayer54: Surye, Korts, Marmalade, Celebloki, Inquisitor JL, Evilgorrilaz, q21, Riceballtail, Mr. Incrediball, Mellowed Man

Not voting: Killa Seven, Marmalade, Psychatrog, Rigel, ValiantValant

Surye, Marmalade, mr. incrediball, and Korts are all double voters?

indeed

[/joke]

[mr. incrediball]

i don't see how it would be particularly benificial for the remaining mason (assuming there is one) to claim or stay silent. after all, with both their partners dead, they're nothing more than a vanilla now.

on a side note, i don't think there are/were 3 masons in the first place. if there were 3, it would be more likely that one of them would back up zs.

[mr. incrediball]

babygirl seems to act scummy in a lot of games. in another game i was playing BG seemed incredibly scummy, the turned out to be a cop.

so, i'm reluctant to vote her, but

fos babygirl

nonetheless.

[mr. incrediball]

i don't really think MM is telling the truth. he seems to be attempting to pull the wool over our eyes using a 1-shot killing role to cover his bases.

also, has anyone considered that this "cutting his computer time" is just an excuse to deadbeat?

i'll put him at l-1 for you. it'll be YOUR choice to lynch him.

vote mellowedman

.

[mr. incrediball]

i'll put him at l-1 for you. it'll be YOUR choice to lynch him.

This line confuses me, who does it refer to?

whoever reads it.

[mr. incrediball]

Are we really? Well, I'll give mellowed one more shot, though I'd like to somehow work out a way to prove his ability.

unvote, vote Riceballtail

. I love how he didn't even try to defend himself.

Also, if Mellowed is scum, I'm perfectly fine with a BM lynch.

Don't you realize that the scum are going to kill me tonight no matter what?

Also, are you encouraging me to kill someone at night, of your choice? There really is no way I can prove it, because if you all get me to kill someone, there may be a mafia roleblocker, like there are in Newbie Games.

FoS: Alabaska J

i thought you said you were 1-shot?

[mr. incrediball]

hmmm...


mellowed man... mellowed man...

1) i'm sorely tempted to go with LAL on this one. i can't see any motivation behind lying about the number of shots you have if you are town.

2) you're vote-hopping. a lot. calm down. not everyone who accuses you is guaranteed scum.

3) i don't get this whole "he claimed in twilight, he must be town" thing. i've been in plenty of games where players have maintained that they are town all the way up to the death scene, and then turned out scum.


Alabaska, on the other hand, also seems to be cracking under pressure. accusing people left, right, and centre.


I don't see enough evidence against riceballtail to constitute a lynch, considering all he did was reach a bit.

and BM is flip-flopping on the MM issue. He seemed to leap straight from "MM must be scum" to "Rice must be scum" without there seeming to be any moment of confusion in between the two conclusions.




so:

Major FOS: MM and Alabaska.
FOS: BM

[mr. incrediball]

Maybe so he doesnt get NKed?

have you heard of a wonderful new invention? it's called a doc.

erm, dude, use some context please. In between me thinking MM was scum and my subsequent suspicions was the fake-twilight thing. Anyway being suspicious of multiple people is usually a town tell. Why would there be confusion??
Is that a towntell that i missed?

BM

meh. you just seemed to switch way too fast. i was reading, and it was like "woooosh!"

[mr. incrediball]

Maybe so he doesnt get NKed?

have you heard of a wonderful new invention? it's called a doc.

Have you noticed who's died in this game? Korts was a doctor.

thats a towntell for incrediball imho. An idiottell but a towntell too.

BM

woops.

[mr. incrediball]

Regardless, acknowledging that competent scum do something is irrelevant, as MM is clearly not 'competent scum' (no offence!) to the extent that i think you mean.

Do you know something i dont about him?

Or are you just trying to be argumentative?

unvote, vote: Battle Mage

For the blatant rolefish.

that's a MAJOR reach.

what could BM possibly be suggesting relating to this game? that you have a role which can find out how competent someone is? that he thinks MM has secretly revealed master strategies to you through nightalk?

he was asking if you knew something about how good MM is, not about his role! blatant paranoia.

[mr. incrediball]

rofl. You're SO right, and it feels great watching Fonz get TOLD by a newer players.

i like how everyone on this site thinks i'm a mafia noob.

[mr. incrediball]

i don't know what to think about BG. she's acting scummy, but, as i've pointed out, she was like that as a cop in another game.


all in all, scum or not, she's just a bad player.

[mr. incrediball]

i'm gonna hold off, and wait for our 3 new players to show up.

[mr. incrediball]

nice to see we've replaced our old, rusty rigel with a souped-up kuribo 2000!


unfortunately, i've read through your post multiple times and fail to see the case against dizzyizzy. but then again, i am stupid.

[mr. incrediball]

With reference to your (limited) content, how the hell can you conceive that Izzy's post was a

JOKE????!!!

hm... i don't get that. is it meant to be sarcastic?

[mr. incrediball]

bugger this game.

unvote, vote alabaska

. your play for most of this game looks like scum backed into a corner, and trying to do anything to shift the blame.

fos BM

, you complained about alabaska's wierd reach on you, and then do exactly the same to DI over there. also your play for this game has seen you madly flailing onto any lead possible.

fos q21

. after making sense of mellowed's post, it looks like he has a point there.



anything else? hm....


oh yes:

Spineless.

I stand by a RBT lynch.

is it supposed to be

a

RBT or

an

RBT? that's always confused me.

[mr. incrediball]

Apologies for my general absence, but we had a power supply failure in our dinosaur of a PC, which kind of prevents internet-type activities fairly effectively.

I really have very little clue at the moment, having just read through pages of claim, counter claim, counter counter claim, and abuse. Seems people don't like to play nice round here.

stfu!

[mr. incrediball]

i think i've seen scum self-hammer, or at least approve of their own lynch.

[mr. incrediball]

hmm...

i'm sorta suspicious of those who were constantly against BM yesterday...

on the other hand, smart scum wouldn't kill someone they'd often been "suspicious" of...

oh, this wine in front of me...

[mr. incrediball]

I think I know why there was only one kill, but I want to see what MM says first.

q21's obviously gearing himself up for a claim here. this should be interesting...



@ all those who are screaming LAL (strangercoug and RBT):

we already know he's been lying, considering he changed from a 1-shot claim to a full vigilante claim. but i agree with you, in that this just might be the icing on the scum-cake. q21 seems to be getting ready to defend MM, so i'll sit back and watch the fireworks before i go voting MM.

[mr. incrediball]

bah. i hate it when this happens.

When what happens? 2 Week-long night phases and you forget what the hell was happening in this game? Thats what happened to me

BM died, eejit.

[mr. incrediball]

MM is still looking nasty, but his claim works, i guess.

i'm stumped. bah.

[mr. incrediball]

i HATE self-defeatist claptrap, that's absolutely the worst thing you could do!

vote MM

[mr. incrediball]

*sigh*, let's just get this over with...

[mr. incrediball]

Hang on... there's been a modding mistake somewhere.

Mod: The front page lists two players as dying night two, but your post announcing the start of day three lists only one death. What figures?

woah! good spot fonz!

mellowed, don't be so emotional, it's just a game. we're really sorry that you feel so bad, but sparing your feelings isn't exactly the aim of the game here.

on the other hand, looks like you could be saved.

unvote

until mod explains this new development.

[mr. incrediball]

well...

RBT's main antagonists are dead. they are town. one or two of them was nightkilled.

he's been wagoning, and opportunistic.

he's had little input, and next to no defence.

he is scum.

vote RBT

.

[mr. incrediball]

Yes, my antagonists are dead, I guess I'll just have to fish up some new ones, won't I? Hmm, funny you are pointing this out though. It's quite easy that someone has been doing this to set me up, possibly you?

HoS:Mr.I

yes, of course. i've been slowly killing off anybody who's suspected you for the sole purpose of making you look scummy. i've taken all this trouble to set up you, someone who looked scummy anyway. what a pity you foiled my conspiracy. huzzah for you.

[mr. incrediball]

Lonely... xP

don't worry strange... i'm here!

[mr. incrediball]

dude, we have a scummy candidate. we just need more submariners to pop up and discuss the popular lynch choice atm. putting your head on the block is not a smart way to get discussion going...


*realises this is exactly what SC wants me to do*

[mr. incrediball]

blimey, i've been L/A all weekend and this thread has only advanced a few posts!? not only is the conversation slow, but you've been reduced to lurker hunting!?

lurker hunting rarely gets you anywhere, since lurking is a null-tell. if you're that worried about the lurkers, ask for replacements! don't go lynching possible townies!

[mr. incrediball]

mr. incrediball, if you don't like the fact that Riceballtail and I are lurker hunting, then actually vote for one of us.

1. my vote's already on RBT.

2. Lurker-hunting isn't scummy, it just distracts from actual scumminess. therefore i'm not voting for you.

[mr. incrediball]

it feels like there are only 4 people playing...

[mr. incrediball]

Protected MM N2, even though I didn't believe it.

of course, why shouldn't you?

[mr. incrediball]

i'm not fully believing RBT's claim either. protective roles are easy fakes to pull off... that is, until an obvious choice for protection gets NKed. until such an event, i say we leave RBT alone.

unvote

.