This post lays down what people need to know about AITP before we continue.Primate wrote:This post is not devoid of content.JDodge wrote:Vote: ZombieSlayer
He is to be the bandwagon for Day 1. Let us speedlynch, it has been proven by the past 3 AITP games on the forums. Let us make haste.
ZombieSlayer has been chosen for his contentful post, which is anti-town in a game which requires posts to without question be devoid of content except for votes so we can avoid leaving any clues to the identities of the khalifs. Go go go.
Now lynch. Gogogo.Just because I was a townie one game does not mean I am a townie this game.
It sucks that I again have to make a contentful postZombieSlayer54 wrote:Logic hurts the town?JDodge wrote:LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH
LYNCH THE BOY WONDER WHO STILL CAN'T FIGURE OUT HOW MUCH CONTENT HURTS THE TOWN
GO GO GO
Logic keeps townies from getting lynched, and gets scum lynched. I do not see how that hurts the town.
By the way: As far as I can tell, you are not joking any more. Just attempting a bandwagon.
And attempting bandwagons are almost never a townie move.
Unless there is a jester role that we do not know about, or something.
ROW ROW ROWFlameaxe wrote:Vote zombie
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
Except that any Guard who starts a bandwagon would know enough not to start one on a Khalif. One must question why you didn't notice this - the best reason being that you are an assassin. Diescumdie.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:I already admitted that I could see you logic in the fact that my role in one game does not effect my role in another.JDodge wrote:You're dim. Mostly you're thinking other games have any bearing on your alignment here. Please die.
What I was pointing out is the fact that in any game (And fine, FlameAxe. I shall never mention the Pikmin game again, even though I am already dead in the damn thing.) bandwagoning is no good, because you have far more of a chance of killing a townie than scum. In this game, it also points out who you are reluctant to bandwagon to the Assassins, whom can then presume that those people are the Khalifs.
Yes. It does. The most pro-town thing you can do at this point is vote yourself - if you are town, you have outed yourself as a guard and are thus useless to us. If you are scum, you're dying anyways because of the first. Sorry, try again next game.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:*facepalm.jpg*Yosarian2 wrote:The first couple of posts were random voting. That = bad.Flameaxe wrote: It's not random voting. Its quicklynching the scum. Hop on.
Everyone needs to go back and read the first game, ASAP.
Also,vote:Zombieslayer. He claimed guard so therefore he needs to die.
You know, if I had not claimed guard, you would have said something along the lines of:
"Oh, well you are accused of being scum, but you have not denied it! Therefore, YOU MUST BE SCUM!"
I still do not understand that kind of reasoning.
I mean, damned if I do, damned if I do not. Kind of sucks. Really does.
Not really. Saying that your logic is infallible because one person can't combat it is like saying that a skyscraper is terrorist-proof because someone set off a cherry bomb in one of the toilets.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:I have new logic out. Please try to combat that, if you would.Flameaxe wrote:Your logic is very one-sided. I have attempted to combat it, but you seem to be incapable of looking at it both ways.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:FlameAxe:
I would appreciate it if you at least tried to combat my logic. I notice that you do not do that a lot...
Instead, all you say is: LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON
If you do not, all I can say is that you have no argument against it, which means that my logic is infallible, which means that...
Well, I think you get where I am going with this.
You're not realizing why you need to be lynched even though it's been spelled out for you numerous times already. That makes you an idiot. I'm not going to respond to this any more because I don't want to encourage you to post more so that you can harm the town more. Now please, go away and die.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:I just did the same thing you did, and now you are calling me an idiot because of it?JDodge wrote:You're an idiot. Vote for yourself before you do more irreparable harm to the town.
This is not your game. This is not in any way suitable for you. You are becoming more of a liability by the moment and you need to die right this instant. You are a horrible player for this sort of game; you think logic reigns supreme in every last situation you see.
Thank you for playing, go away.
I love the irony here. I really do. I should go get some toast for the sake of spreading the irony on it like butter.
Minimal discussion. Say as little as possible. Vote someone, see if anyone starts a competing bandwagon. If they do, they should give reasoning. And if they don't, then you shoulg give no credence to it. And if they give reasoning, give as little as possible back to show why yours is better.Shy Guy wrote:Can you re-explain your stance then Jdodge, on how to play the game well? I re-read the first game and I thought Sarcastro almost won because there was too much analysis/discussion.
Do you think that it is good to have analysis and discussion now? How much, and why? I'm confused.
He is an idiot. He single-handedly lost us the game for something that should have been obvious. You're angry because I caught you out on page 1.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:Ok, JDodge:
Stop being such an asshole. Seriously.
You can criticize him for making mistakes, but for the love of god, do not get on him like that, with the "YOU ARE AN IDIOT!"
Seriously dude. It is not cool.
Question to people who have been around more than I have:
Has he always been like this?