My wagon disintegrating into wagons on two of my scum reads is interesting.
In post 277, Sakura Hana wrote:Could you explain your reads on DV, pieguy and wayne?
Your quote on wayne looks like you didnt like his reasoning.
DV:
27 feels like sucking up/grooming/buddying/whatever you want to call it.
101 whole lotta words, whole lotta nothin'.
112 more words, more nothin'.
Pie:
104 exchanges with Nati feel scummy as fuck. Too much "This is what town would say!" and not enough "I'm town and this is what I'm saying!"
107 Also scummy.
Wayne:
38 is a town post.
89 right idea, wrong reasons.
94 resident VI.
P.S. disagreeing with reasoning doesn't mean you think they're scum.
Laff.
In post 294, AGar wrote:You came in, made an offhand snide remark about how we should summon you when we were out of RVS when we clearly were
Actually it was an offhand comment about being past that stupid "oh lets analyze these meaningless early votes without flips!" stage.
For the record, you weren't past that stage when I made the post.
In post 294, AGar wrote:your posting should be practically shitting gold. You should make the most of the opportunities you are getting to post.
... I am?
In post 294, AGar wrote:
Follow up has been better, but don't get indignant because
you
don't understand the wagon on you.
I understood the wagon just fine, I just thought it was utter shit.
In post 303, DeasVail wrote:To those that seem to think otherwise, the Majiffy wagon was never, at least for me, about lack of activity, but the really awkward reason given for not posting. If he's busy as town he'll say he's busy, not make up something about RVS, which is still what I suspect he's done.
I never once said I wasn't posting because of RVS. I merely noted 11 pages had gone on and asked if it was over.
In post 303, DeasVail wrote:To someone who's actually read my post, this should be obvious, so I think that Majiffy claiming that the wagon on him is about a lack of posts, when I think he would notice that there were actual reasons for it from at least Talah and myself, is scummy.
Your reason sucked.
I can't remember Talah's.
7/9 votes (if we consider yours and talahs as being reasoned) on a wagon about lack of posts makes the wagon about a lack of posts.
Pretty simple concept.
Oh, right. You're scum.
Please point out "continued justification" of whatever it is you're claiming I'm trying to continue to justify.
I never really said it was.
Levi:
Shitty entrance with
9 and 10.
Really don't like the tone of
48.
58 "I'm town so that means I want to lynch scum so I'm going to talk about how I'm going to lynch scum ITT to look town!", also known as "look how obvtown I am!"
64 more "LHOIA!"
Possible emoticon tell. That would be something for a meta dive and I hate doing that shit.
Way too much
fence-sitting on the
reads he provides, and the
rest of his content is essentially useless as far as a scumhunting perspective is concerned.
258 is bad in several ways.
Plus
264 which I called him out on and he
responded poorly.
In post 306, NachoKoopa wrote: In post 275, Majiffy wrote:Also why do you feel like you're playing ScumLurkCho rather than TownAsFuckCho?
Last time I was TownAsFuckCho I was actually scum.
Last time I was ScumLurkCho I was your scumpartner and actually not lurking at all.
So you're saying that because you're actively trying to alter your meta it can no longer be used against you?
Also I like how you really aren't arguing against the scum read here.