Meaning scum get a daykill and you're close to confirmed town unless Mainez is also scum?
Sounds good to me.
In post 9, farside22 wrote:In post 7, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Meaning scum get a daykill and you're close to confirmed town unless Mainez is also scum?
Sounds good to me.
Hi nacho!
I didn't play the last game and I'm too lazy to look.
Any clue if the day kill is public?
That would be awesomesauce
In post 10, Mainez wrote:In post 7, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Meaning scum get a daykill and you're close to confirmed town unless Mainez is also scum?
Sounds good to me.
hmm interesting... how do you know scum got the daykill? i believe farside's description of his unfortunate horoscope meant he got the "opposite alignment empowered" and it says that the scumteam may choose one fortunate horoscope.
In post 17, Mainez wrote:i agree that the daykill is most likely the choice but it's a bit too big of an assumption to assume that scum did choose the daykill.
In post 22, Mainez wrote:can you explain how it can be used as a vengekill?
In post 33, lane0168 wrote:In post 28, Nachomamma8 wrote:sure ok I can town read that too
What is this? What is the town read? Not following
In post 41, Marquis wrote:In post 37, lane0168 wrote:@nacho, roger
VOTE: lane
we are absolutely lynching this today
In post 56, startfromtheheart wrote:Ok on my cellular it says that the unfortunate and fortunate are randomized, so chance of daykill being sent out is like 20% ish.
In post 55, Marquis wrote:i mean
are you okay with it??
afaik lane has a penchant for being horribly too-obv as scum so.
In post 61, Ricastle wrote:VOTE: startfromtheheart
I think it's pretty obvious how to start this. We'll do popcorn for dayvigs and see who has one. If nobody does, Far is confscum. If somebody does, it's a scum lynch and Far is conftown. That sound good?
In post 70, Marquis wrote:maybe i'm just old now but i'm not getting why lane would question a townread on me like that when the reasoning was already there, and then when spelled out for him without further meaningful elaboration, simply say "ok"
i mean i don't really get how lane just dropped it at that. there's so much more that could have been asked or discussed had he actually cared about it besides a one-off "talking" point
In post 82, lane0168 wrote:And it would be stupid. Unless that's exactly why they didn't choose it. Major wifom I know.
In post 89, elusive wrote:It makes sense although I would say it would probably be best for town to choose a specific player (the scummiest or lurkiest bastard) and have players target one players and then wait to see if anything happens, then the next player target that scummy lil monkey, etc.
In post 97, lane0168 wrote:@nacho I read in the old dead thread that Sal asked if he could send it via pm, and he couldn't. Maybe that's what you remember?
In post 108, lane0168 wrote:Except now I'm beginning to see that there's huge benefit to not picking the daykill. Don't you agree? If they picked it, we're trading scum 1 for 1 today.
In post 121, Ricastle wrote:Oh...yeah...right. I didn't realise scum didn't have pre-game chat about this.
In post 123, farside22 wrote:I didn't realize scum had day talk?
In post 253, startfromtheheart wrote:In post 251, Nachomamma8 wrote:marquis if that was a troll it was a pretty solid one
if it wasn't then bad marquis
Hi I'm prod dodging, scrub!
In post 258, elusive wrote:The logical thing as town to do is to try to help players with reading you and your reaction was not your usual reaction as town.
In post 263, elusive wrote:I see neither Nacho or Startfromtheheart actually counteract how Tammy is NOT playing to her scum meta so far (lack of reads, focusing on things other than the game, playing the dumb blonde, etc)
In post 277, Aronis wrote:@farside about the daykill thing: I'd have to clarify with the mod about how the daykill would work to make sure town doesn't screw me over by doing this. If I could get it and avoid using it until I wanted it, I would choose it and then save it till LyLo for the insta-win. If not, I'd take the roleblock.
In post 268, elusive wrote:Things I know about: female emotional\psychological responses. And faking it
In post 366, startfromtheheart wrote:GROOT do you like my vote
In post 402, lane0168 wrote:So elusive doesn't seem to be this bad with cases in her town games. She actually is pretty good at scumhunting (meaning her cases are legit, not necessarily correct) and doesn't seem so agitated as town. As far as I can see she's not playing her town game at all. Besides posting links. She seems to always do that, but they usually make sense.
Not like linking a newbie and normal game and questioning why tammy didn't setup spec in those
In post 419, Tammy wrote:
You don't know me!
What do you think of Bert?
In post 422, lane0168 wrote:I'm glad you can see that elusive's meta read is terrible. How does that, or anything else shes done make her the towniest person in few game?
In post 434, Tammy wrote:I think I'm off to a pretty good start here. Why don't you think so?
In post 443, lane0168 wrote:Makes her the towniest in the game? That's crazy cause I was thinking convictions to shit cases weren't very townie. Scum trying to push through a crap case more likely. But your explanation could not have possibly been any better
In post 451, Tammy wrote:I was thinking about this while out for a walk and I'm wondering about your expectations from me now. The game started last Tuesday. I know that for the majority of this game so far that you've been busy, so I'm not sure what you expected me to do? And I also don't know why you expected me to look at the elusive interaction before I had a chance to do so when I said that I would today. What am I letting you get away with when you haven't had much of a chance to be around in the first place?
In post 505, lane0168 wrote:I don't like how much nacho isn't doing, and the things he had done seem to just stir confusion... things nacho has said, after already playing this exact type of game
In post 562, Tammy wrote:In post 559, Aronis wrote:
(That you are using a loophole to avoid following the activity rules and should be modkilled?)
I was expecting Nacho to say something about it, but he didn't even come in here.
VOTE: nachomamma
In post 630, Tammy wrote:I am voting him because when he did pop back in to post "Hi Tammy!" He didn't actually answer the question I asked him in Post 451 when it should be really easy for him to answer that.
In post 630, Tammy wrote:I'm not concerned that his original questions to me about why I was letting him get away with stuff was him kinda taunting me because if he is scum this game it would be the first time in a couple years at least that I started off with an incorrect town read on him. I mean I've sometimes had no big problems with him at the start when he's scum, but I can't remember the last time I started off with a town read on him when he was scum and haven't been getting after him. Therefore, if he was scum and I was town reading him, I think he would find it funny so he might kinda poke at me a little bit and find it funny that I'm wrong. He would then also want to keep up appearances to show some early paranoia of me just giving him an easy town read because several times when I've been scum and he's been town, I've found easy reasons to call him town, so that would be a perfect avenue for a scum him to go with me to do what I would expect from him.