Mini #406, Animaniacs! Water Tower Explosion! [Over]
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Wow. hating on not random voting? There has been actually a long discussion on this not too long ago, and I beleive I am not the only person to be weary of random votes. this is he way of play nad is mearly a style. I admit I hate the begining of the first day too because getting peolpe is like pulling teeth.
For now I'm going to put a light non-randomvote: Sailor JerryI have a feeling he's just trying to move conversation along, but I am getting a very small scum vibe as well.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
And I never apollogized for not random voting, and I don't think I ever will. I was simply apollogizng for being late (Which Apartnly wasn't even true).
I'm perfefctly happy to contribute and discuss, I just don't think random votes are a good means of doing it.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Wow. that was some bad logic there. Or were you kidding? the smile makes me think you were, but the FOS makes me think you arn't.
Personaly I do think that random votes help much. All they do is tend to pressure random people (Which statisticaly means most of the time pro-towns claiming) which is BAD for the town.I admit, it's not exactly game breaking, but I do think it gives a slight advantage to scum.
As for voting newbies. Being newbie is in no way connected with being scum, so I seriously hope you and fritz are kidding about that. True, if a newbie seems very scummy we're not going to NOT lynch him just because he's a newbie, but lynching a newbie right out of the gate seems nonsensical to me.
As for no lynch, I agree that 99.9999% of the time no lynch is a very bad idea. I don't think you're going to have any arguments with me for that.
Becuase I think that may have been a joke, I'm not going to even FOS, but I'm waiting for your responce.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Yes, I did mean I don't think it would help. Sorry about that.
Please tell me how randomly killing newbies would help the town win, if statisticly newbies are more liekly to be pro-town than not. (About 4:1) If I misundserstood and this is not what mole meant, then I hope mole or fritz will explain.
As I said before, I don't think random votes are in pertocularly very harmful to the town (See my notes on that above), but I do think lynching newbies off is a very bad idea (if that's what mole/fritz were talking about, and it sounds like they were)
I think I willunvote: SJfor now. I'm going to wait a little longer to see how things go.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I was defending you? Sorry, but I honestly didn't even notice your posts since they arn't very serious. You havn't said anything really that is worth defending. The only stat I gave was 1:4 mafia/town ratio, which is the most widely accepted ratio for mafia games.
Maybe I am a kill joy, and perhaps I do take mafia a bit seriously, but I'm out to win, and I don't think the strategies put forth by fritzler/mole so far are helpful to a town win.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Fuldu: Did I? If so, sorry. I could have sworn it was 1:4.
SJ: that is a very good question.
I didn't mean to say that we shouldn't vote newbies, or anyone. voting by itself isn't all that dangeruos, but the term LYNCH was used, and that was what made me nervous. I think there has been a misunderstanding because of this.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Fuldu: I think scum:town is what I was thinking. I wasn't arguing the point, I was just surprised I got it wrong.
I admit I too am surprised by chamber's anouncement. If he has a reason to be absent, that is one thing, but this seems to be just asking to not participate for no reason. I'm very tempted to vote him, but I'm going to give him a shadow of a doubt and wait for him to respond.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
VitimanR: That's pure WIFOM by the way. Not perticipating (without a good reason) is scummy.
And you're voting me because I'm opposed to random voting? I understand an FOS maybe (as other have done), but 1.) I think that's rather extreme 2.)It is obvious I'm, doing my best to participate in exchange for not random voting. 3.)I believe said it was more a personal taste (and never said that people should right not ohmygosh stop random voting
vote: chamberWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Basicly, "I won't talk when I don't have anything to say?". That sounds reasonible enough to me, but if that's all, then there was no reason for this whole post in the first place that made me vote you. On the one hand, the point of my vote was acomplished. On the other hand, you make it sound like if I unvote you (reduce bandwagon threat) you will stop talking. for now I'm keeping my vote, just because I want the quiet people to keep talking.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I would like ot hear more from Blake Judge,since random voting me at the beginikng he hasn't said anything else. Coron has atleast posted since, so I'llunvote vote: Blake JudgeWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
NewYear: Would you please stop saying I'm defending you? It smells of Scumlinking.
Also, It seems I misunderstood a sarcastic remark about voting newbies which I took as a serious remark about lynching newbies. It was a misunderstanding which I apologized for in post #58. let's move on.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
SJ:
Could you please tell me why you think I'm scum?
Also, considering how much I've been posting it seems alful crass to cite me not posting in TWO DAYS as a sign of me lurking and such.
MOD: votecount pleaseWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Wow. That's got to hurt you skull having a weight dropped on it.
Fritz: That was all well and good lynching a mafia, but please don't hammer on someone who hasn't claimed yet.
I have to admit BJ's actions during day 1 are suspicous, but I'm not 100% convinced we should rush in to a lynch. Chicken Boo is indeed a character from Animaniacs, though I have no idea what a "non-traditional watcher" is or if that fits with the character. Could you elaberate please on what your role does Blake Judge?
(Chickenboo is a chicken who acts like a person, and most people think is a person)Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I know BJ claimed, I was refering to the overly quick lynching of SJ. Even though it turned out well, I was warning of further rash lychning later on. Just because he claimed and he had acted suspicus during day 1, doesn't mean we should hurry to lynch BJ.
Remember, longer days are good for the town.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
So, no one's going to post today?
For those who know the show, wha do people think of the claim of chickenboo's rolecliaim where he can look at who targered someone if they were nightkiled?
This strikes me as rather un-chickenboo like personaly.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
His further explination makes much more sense with the role. I have a very slight feeling of being tacked on to the claim, but because it fits well with his claim mostly makes that feeling minimal. (In less words, I believe BJ's claim).Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
VR: May I ask why the vote? His answer to Thesp (first post on this page) I thought was reasonable. The same for his question, Though I agree pretty much with your answer to it. Is it something else? please elaberate.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I asume you mean because he's lurking (Annoying, but not not he's not nessicerily paying attention to the game) since he hasn't said anythgint in a while.
I would like to see aprod: chamberthough I don't think this is as certin or a big "revelation" as you make it sound.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
If you don't have proof, then pushing for a claim is going to be BAD for the town, fritz. I know this is what you do and all, but I'm having serious doubts it's best for the town.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I still think thesp's reasoning against mole and Vitiman's reasoning against Fuldu are weak. Dito for Fritz's attack against chamber. Is this day 1 again? I'm going to do some rereading.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
ok, back.
Sounds patenetly paranoid and is very bad logic.thesp wrote:mole wrote: I intended that statement as a threat, to state that I intended to use my vote against him if he did not explain himself.
See, you say that, but I think you just wanted it to look that way. You made it clear that he needed to say something other than what he was saying. It looked like cleverly disguised in-thread scumhelp to me.
VitaminR: From what I've seen of chamber, he has an unusual playing style. Also, I doubt scum would just announce their intention to lurk if it was a significant decision.
JDodge: So if someone admits to doing something, they're automatically cleared of being a suspect?
Vitanman R: Yes.
This is classic WIFOM, and is also very bad logic.
Vote: Thespfor being slightly more scummy than VitimanRWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Sorry. the top quote should read:
thesp wrote:
See, you say that, but I think you just wanted it to look that way. You made it clear that he needed to say something other than what he was saying. It looked like cleverly disguised in-thread scumhelp to me.mole wrote:
I intended that statement as a threat, to state that I intended to use my vote against him if he did not explain himself.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I guess what I mean is what you said sounded to me like you were saying his statement was "Too town to be town." That is what I meant by bad logic. Was this what you were basically saying about the statement?Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I personaly do not trust Fritler's judgement here.
I've seen him play in other games where he does this every time, pushing for a bandwagon, basicly resulting in a random roleclaim. While information is good, it is better to not reveal roles to scum in doing so. I admit, at this point I have no ideas aobut wo might or might not be scum, even after a re-read.
Fritzler, if you have something specific that makes you think someone is scum, and it's big enough to come out (Sometimes it's best to let a scum get away with being scummy os they can hang themselves more) than please share, otherwise I beleive random bandwagoning is bad for the town.
The fact that Fritz has unvoted chamber since makes me thinkk he wasn't as sure as he sounded.
Right now Thesp seems the most scummy to me, I'm going to try varifying Vitamin's claim about thesp. Thesp seems a little bloodythirsty and if it is true it sounds like a good reason to suspect him.
Probibly more later with a possible vote.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I feel Thesp is shoehorning Mole in to a place of suspicion.
You yourself admited that it's not the thing he said in itself, but the timing more or less, yes?
You even say the argument is MORESO sound because of SJ's alignment. But later:thesp wrote:
That's the thing - I agree it was a sound argument (even moreso given SJ's alignment now), and I think mole summed it up in an easy package for SJ to rebut so SJ wouldn't go all over the place. SJ certainly could explain himself without mole's help, why the prompt from mole? That's what gets me - it was fairly clear that SJ needed a defense, and mole is giving SJ the opportunity to not be voted. I don't think that's a throw-away statement, I think it's very deliberate.Fuldu wrote: I actually found that to be a sound argument against SJ. Giving players the opportunity to explain themselves, especially on Day One, is just common sense. I don't think that mole was providing Jerry with any particular foothold on which to build a defense, just pointing out that if he had one, everyone would like to hear it.
So you say he is MORE likely because of SJ's revealed alignment. This sounds like a contradiction to me. I like irony, so I'll say it. Tell me why I shouldn't vote for you thesp?Thesp wrote:
I agree with the premise, yet the fact that Sailor Jerry was indeed scum makes it more likely mole had ulterior motives. It is an inductive argument rather than a deductive one, but I think it merits consideration that it's more likely mole was doing bad things.Fuldu wrote: It could be that mole was doing both, but I don't think that doing the former is inherently scummy or even poor pro-town play, so barring evidence of the latter, I don't think it's reasonable to suggest that mole did anything worthy of suspicion.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Thanks for ignoring my post Fuldu. (Actually it seems everyone missed it)
Vot4e: Fuidugot your attention? Please answer my questions. (Scrolll up to my last post)
I don't understand this whole argument about multiple scum groups. This is a mini game, so isn't it moot?Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Why am I voting you? Did you bother looking back at my post? I'll repeat the question one more time, but if you avoid this for the THIRD TIME I strongly urge people to vote for Thesp.
Foolster41 wrote:I feel Thesp is shoehorning Mole in to a place of suspicion.
You yourself admited that it's not the thing he said in itself, but the timing more or less, yes?
You even say the argument is MORESO sound because of SJ's alignment. But later:thesp wrote:
That's the thing - I agree it was a sound argument (even moreso given SJ's alignment now), and I think mole summed it up in an easy package for SJ to rebut so SJ wouldn't go all over the place. SJ certainly could explain himself without mole's help, why the prompt from mole? That's what gets me - it was fairly clear that SJ needed a defense, and mole is giving SJ the opportunity to not be voted. I don't think that's a throw-away statement, I think it's very deliberate.Fuldu wrote: I actually found that to be a sound argument against SJ. Giving players the opportunity to explain themselves, especially on Day One, is just common sense. I don't think that mole was providing Jerry with any particular foothold on which to build a defense, just pointing out that if he had one, everyone would like to hear it.
So you say he is MORE likely because of SJ's revealed alignment. This sounds like a contradiction to me. I like irony, so I'll say it. Tell me why I shouldn't vote for you thesp?Thesp wrote:
I agree with the premise, yet the fact that Sailor Jerry was indeed scum makes it more likely mole had ulterior motives. It is an inductive argument rather than a deductive one, but I think it merits consideration that it's more likely mole was doing bad things.Fuldu wrote: It could be that mole was doing both, but I don't think that doing the former is inherently scummy or even poor pro-town play, so barring evidence of the latter, I don't think it's reasonable to suggest that mole did anything worthy of suspicion.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
The question, but in the context of what I saw as a contradiction.
The point I was trying to make was basically you were asserting that:
A: Mole's statement against SJ was Sound, because SJ is scum
B: Mole is more likely to be bad because SJ is scum
Now I think of it, it's not as much a contradiction as I thought. It does sound like you're setting yourself up to be right no matter what happens to mole, you can just quote either statement and look good.
I do think you're on the wrong track with this whole thing since statement B is unprovible. Either scum or town could make the statement mole made (this has been repeated by others as well).
Someone (Sorry forget who) said something about you being instrumental in the lynching of SJ. I'm going to double check that to be sure, and If It's true I'll unvote you since I agree giving up a scum buddy this early is not a likely play for scum.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Hmm. from the re-read you made some good points against Sj, but never actually voted for him. A little weird, but still I find it hard to beleive a scum would push so hard against other scum.unvoteWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Ok... if THAT is the reason you are apolllogizing, then would you like to share something?
I guess witholding info so the person will "hang themselves" can be useful sometimes, but it seems pointless to apollogize and then not saying about not being ready to share yet. Also voting for the person is a little bit of a tip-off (not as big as pointing out what it was they did mind you).Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Vitamin: I think it's the double negetive that's confusing me. Could you rephrase it, and tell me what it is refering to. instead of saying you "don't get" why I don't get it?
I agree we are well past random voting.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Ok. I re-read. and the most I got out of it are people I think are probably not scum than anything else (Which is still useful).
The following are players with how likely I think they are scum (my best guesses) with reasoning. i obviously did not include myself.
Fritzler: 60% - Hammered SJ (-10%), but didn't come in until the very end after SJ was pretty much doomed (Negated^). While killing a scumate early would be stupid, I could see scum trying to finish off a doomed scum member to look good. Plus killed SJ before a claim and discusion could be made (+10%) which is agreed as a bad move for town.
Chamber: 55% - A little too lurky for my liking (+5%). Obviously willing to give Ether a chance to change this.
Fuldu: 52% - Kind of late comer on SJ lynch. possible scum tactic?
JDodge: 50% - Acting suspicous in relation to SJ (+10%), but no real reason to beleive fairly solid claim of chickenboo (Negated^)
Blake Judge/Hurrikitty/Mole - 50% Can't really get a read on these either way.
Thesp: 35% - Pushed on Mole for little good strategy in my opinion (+5%). Early on SJ lynch (-20%)
VitamanR: 35% - Making a few statements that I thought were a little scummy (+5%), but at the same time early on the SJ lynch. (+20%)
Based on this I'm going with aUnvote Vote: Fritzler. Not a sure-fire vote mind you, but hopefully this will get more conversation going.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Again, I have to ask, is there good reason to doubt his claim? because right now, if we beleive his claim there's no good reason to beleive he's scum. Sometimes pro-town players do act scummy. I usualy have reason to suspect everyone else by the end of the game.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I never said he claimed. But he did seem rather confident that chamber was scum. and then he unvoted pretty quickly. My point is, his track record makes me not trust his :knowstuff: guts.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I admit that both confused and annoyed me too.
No one is confirmed at all, and I have ABSOLUTLY NO IDEA why you Thesp should think you're somehow more confirmed than anyone else here. Definitly no more than JDODGE who gave a semi-reasonable claim. I admit you're behavoir before this has seemed very pro-town to me (Being early part in SJ's lynch), but you've said things (like this) that has struck me as being scum-ish too.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
I admit that both confused and annoyed me too.
No one is confirmed at all, and I have ABSOLUTLY NO IDEA why you Thesp should think you're somehow more confirmed than anyone else here. Definitly no more than JDODGE who gave a semi-reasonable claim. I admit you're behavoir before this has seemed very pro-town to me (Being early part in SJ's lynch), but you've said things (like this) that has struck me as being scum-ish too.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
Thesp, I agfree with your assesment in your alast post, that you are not rock-solid confirmed, bugt one step below it because your actions in day 1. In your last post you made it sounds like you were rock solid confimed, and that is why Hurrikitty and I responded the way we did.
Thesp said: "Claims are not a defense."
And No it is not, but if it is a REASONABLE claim that doesn't look like it's likely to be false, then THERE"S NO REASON TO THINK THEY ARE SCUM. I have to admit I am getting rather annoyed that I have to keep repeating this over and over again.
I admit dodging the question of who Hurrikittty thinks is mildly suspicious at the least.FOS: HurrikittyWinner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"
So, then you agree that Frizler is the most scummy person>
I sad long days are good for town, but this is getting to be a little ridiculous. If people think Fritzler has good odds of being scum, then we should vote for him and see what he claims.Winner of the "if real life was like mafia" thread. :D
**May be going on permanent Limited Access as soon as April 1st. :(**-
-
Foolster41 Auther
- Auther
- Auther
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: "Wh-Who am I?"